Skip to content
Ch Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Ch Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$9.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
91
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$51MEducation$25MHealth$6.7MHuman Services$5.8MPhilanthropy$4.1MCommunity Improvement$1.6MYouth Development$1.4MRecreation & Sports$1.3MOther$0
02FY2024 · 91 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k44 grants · $1.1M
  • $50k–250k28 grants · $2.6M
  • $250k+10 grants · $6.0M
$40,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$175M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUBBOCK ENTERTAINMENT AND PERFORMIN$1,326,510
SOUTH PLAINS COLLEGE$1,000,000
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF NORTHWEST TE$650,000
TALKINGTON COLLEGE OF VISUAL AND PE$600,000
LUBBOCK ENTERTAINMENT AND PERFORMIN$502,000
LOUISE HOPKINS UNDERWOOD CENTER FOR$500,000
COVENANT HEALTH FOUNDATION$500,000
LEVELLAND WALLACE THEATER$416,666
SCHOOL OF MEDICINEENDOWED CHAIR$300,000
LUBBOCK AREA UNITED WAY$250,000
GUADALUPE-PARKWAY CENTERS$240,000
UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIO$200,000
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF NORTHWEST TE$175,000
EARLY LEARNING CENTERS$165,000
DAVIS COLLEGE - RANCH MANAGEMENT PR$147,834
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SHELBY'S BRIDGE: $20k → 16%HIGH POINT VILLAGE: $50k → 17%SHELBY'S BRIDGE: $13k → 16%HIGH POINT VILLAGE: $47k → 17%BAILEY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOC: $23k → 16%HIGH POINT VILLAGE: $45k → 17%BROWNFIELD SENIOR CITIZENS: $15k → 21%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $36k → 17%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICE: $35k → 17%HIGH POINT VILLAGE: $20k → 17%PARENTING COTTAGE: $30k → 17%PARENTING COTTAGE: $30k → 17%PARENTING COTTAGE: $30k → 17%PARENTING COTTAGE: $30k → 17%PARENTING COTTAGE: $30k → 17%WOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES: $75k → 17%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF LUBBOCK: $9k → 17%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF LUBBOCK: $9k → 17%INSIDE OUT FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%INSIDE OUT FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%THE INSIDE OUT FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%INSIDE OUT FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%INSIDE OUT FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%EARLY LEARNING CENTERS OF LUBBOCK: $165k → 17%EARLY LEARNING CENTERS OF LUBBOCK: $155k → 17%EARLY LEARNING CENTERS OF LUBBOCK: $145k → 17%EARLY LEARNING CENTERS OF LUBBOCK: $145k → 17%EARLY LEARNING CENTERS OF LUBBOCK: $145k → 17%HIGH POINT VILLAGE: $101k → 17%LUBBOCK IMPACT: $51k → 17%SHELBY'S BRIDGE: $50k → 17%PARENTING COTTAGE: $36k → 17%PARENTING COTTAGE: $36k → 17%LUBBOCK IMPACT: $35k → 17%PARENTING COTTAGE: $30k → 17%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICE: $30k → 17%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICE: $30k → 17%ECHO WEST TEXAS: $25k → 17%SHELBY'S BRIDGE: $17k → 17%THE INSIDE OUT FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%INSIDE OUT FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%HIGH POINT VILLAGE: $15k → 17%INSIDE OUT FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%HIGH POINT VILLAGE: $15k → 17%FIRST IN TEXAS: $10k → 17%LUBBOCK IMPACT: $46k → 17%LUBBOCK IMPACT: $30k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$64M · 112 repeat orgs$35M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

112 repeat relationships: 54 still active in FY2024, 58 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

112
78

Total granted

$64M
$34M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+20%

Still filing today

59%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $970k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $5.8M · revenue +20%
  • YW
    YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LUBBOCK
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.9M · revenue +37%
  • LA
    LUBBOCK AREA UNITED WAY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • LE
    LUBBOCK ENTERTAINPERFORMING ARTS A
    one grant, 2022 · $27M
  • TT
    TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY SYSTEM
    one grant, 2017 · $1.7M
  • TT
    TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $931k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lubbock Family Outreach Center Inc Dba Family Guidance & Outreach Center

The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.

Human Services
2
Community Health Center of Lubbock Inc

Provide quality primary and preventataive health care services to those in need.

Health
3
Junior League of Lubbock Foundation

The foundation was established to provide a permanent endowment fund or funds for the purpose of encouraging members of the public to make gifts to the junior league of lubbock, inc. and for providing a more secure and permanent means of…

Community Improvement
4
Lubbock Association of Realtors Inc

Trade Organization of Real Estate Professionals. Promoting the common interest of the Real Estate industry in Lubbock and the surrounding area. To help promote improvement of business conditions in this area.

—
5
Ywca of Lubbock Legacy Fund Inc

The ywca of lubbock legacy fund inc. is dedicated to meeting the needs of the ywca of lubbock in supporting the community through its mission of eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for…

Philanthropy
6
Lubbock County Junior Livestock Association

Promoting agricultural education, leadership and agricultural entrepreneurship in the youth of lubbock county, texas; encouraging and recognizing the achievement of youth in agriculture and livestock management; encouraging youth academic…

Youth Development
7
Lubbock Christian University Foundation

Raising funds to support the activities of lubbock christian university and to fund capital projects for instructional facilities for lubbock christian university.

Education
8
Civic Lubbock Inc

To foster and promote educational, cultural and entertainment programs, to include the visual and performing arts, for the citizens of lubbock and the surrounding area.

Arts & Culture
9
Goodwill Industries of Lubbock Contract Services Inc

Goodwill is a local nonprofit helping people overcome challenges, build skills, find jobs and grow careers.

Employment
10
Goodwill Industries of Lubbock Inc

Goodwill is a local nonprofit helping people overcome challenges, build skills, find jobs and grow careers.

Employment
11
Texas Girls and Boys Ranch

Sharing jesus, healing hearts, transforming lives.

Human Services
12
Texas Tech Alumni Association

The organization cultivates loyalty, tradition, service, and lifelong relationships. supporting and assisting in the development and increasing of the facilities of texas tech university through (1) encourage & establish scholarships, (2)…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lubbock Area United Way Inc; the most unlike its peers is Caerus Ensemble. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

89 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 89 of the 211 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

14
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
27
Early backer (in before they grew)
84/89
Grantees still filing
58/89
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LUBBOCK ENTERTAINPERFORMING ARTS A: $26,609,790 · OtherLUBBOCK ENTERTAINPERFORMING ARTS ALUBBOCK ENTERTAINMENT AND PERFORMIN: $15,333,660 · OtherLUBBOCK ENTERTAINMENT AND PERFORMINSOUTH PLAINS COLLEGE: $4,000,000 · OtherSOUTH PLAINS COLLEGESOUTH PLAINS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $3,000,000 · OtherYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LUBBOCK: $2,910,000 · Other+141 more: $20,791,140 · Other+141 moreTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $5,801,704 · EducationTEXAS TEC…LUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1,275,000 · EducationLUBBOCK C…Texas Interscholastic League Foundation: $585,750 · EducationTexas Int…SOUTH PLAINS CLOSING THE GAPS P-20 COUNCIL: $300,000 · Education+4 more: $429,024 · EducationBALLET LUBBOCK: $1,594,000 · Arts & CultureLEVELLAND WALLACE THEATER: $1,514,559 · Arts & CultureLUBBOCK SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $1,267,407 · Arts & CultureTHE LOUISE HOPKINS UNDERWOOD CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $847,390 · Arts & CultureLUBBOCK ARTS ALLIANCE INC: $537,000 · Arts & CultureLUBBOCK MOONLIGHT MUSICALS INC: $510,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CHARLES ADAMS STUDIO PROJECT: $335,979 · Arts & CultureLUBBOCK EXPERIENCE INC: $300,000 · Arts & Culture+6 more: $724,017 · Arts & CultureCOVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $3,550,000 · HealthAlstrom Angels: $500,000 · HealthUMC FOUNDATION: $200,000 · Health+5 more: $161,921 · HealthLUBBOCK AREA UNITED WAY INC: $1,888,200 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST TEXAS: $373,875 · Philanthropy+4 more: $173,245 · PhilanthropyEARLY LEARNING CENTERS OF LUBBOCK INC: $755,000 · Human ServicesHIGH POINT VILLAGE INC: $292,711 · Human ServicesTHE PARENTING COTTAGE: $252,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES: $225,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC: $163,406 · Human ServicesLUBBOCK IMPACT INC: $161,360 · Human ServicesBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $131,400 · Human ServicesINSIDE OUT FOUNDATION: $120,000 · Human ServicesREFUGE SERVICES INC: $117,600 · Human ServicesSHELBYS BRIDGE: $99,500 · Human Services+5 more: $90,872 · Human ServicesVOLUNTEER CENTER OF LUBBOCK INC: $1,149,450 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR LEAGUE OF LUBBOCK INC: $50,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $18,500 · Community Improvement
Other$72,644,590Education$8,391,478Arts & Culture$7,630,352Health$4,411,921Philanthropy$2,435,320Human Services$2,408,849Community Improvement$1,217,950

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $5,801,704 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetCOVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $3,550,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetSOUTH PLAINS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $3,000,000 over 3y, 36% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LUBBOCK: $2,910,000 over 8y, 15% of budgetLUBBOCK AREA UNITED WAY INC: $1,888,200 over 8y, 7.4% of budgetBALLET LUBBOCK: $1,594,000 over 8y, 23% of budgetLEVELLAND WALLACE THEATER: $1,514,559 over 6y, 45% of budgetLUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1,275,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetLUBBOCK SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $1,267,407 over 8y, 14% of budgetVOLUNTEER CENTER OF LUBBOCK INC: $1,149,450 over 7y, 31% of budgetTHE LOUISE HOPKINS UNDERWOOD CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $847,390 over 3y, 43% of budgetEARLY LEARNING CENTERS OF LUBBOCK INC: $755,000 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetLUBBOCK CHILDRENS HEALTH CLINIC: $680,000 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetTexas Interscholastic League Foundation: $585,750 over 8y, 6.8% of budgetLUBBOCK ARTS ALLIANCE INC: $537,000 over 8y, 16% of budgetLUBBOCK MOONLIGHT MUSICALS INC: $510,000 over 7y, 15% of budgetAlstrom Angels: $500,000 over 2y, 50% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST TEXAS: $373,875 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTH TEXAS INC: $369,834 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CHARLES ADAMS STUDIO PROJECT: $335,979 over 7y, 36% of budgetSOUTH PLAINS CLOSING THE GAPS P-20 COUNCIL: $300,000 over 6y, 76% of budgetLUBBOCK EXPERIENCE INC: $300,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetHIGH POINT VILLAGE INC: $292,711 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetLUBBOCK HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $280,000 over 7y, 10% of budgetTHE PARENTING COTTAGE: $252,000 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetCASA OF THE SOUTH PLAINS INC: $250,388 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC: $240,789 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF TEXAS OKLAHOMA PLAINS INC: $240,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetLITERACY LUBBOCK: $229,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetWOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES: $225,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetUMC FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetRanching Heritage Association: $190,050 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetTHE LUBBOCK CHORALE: $188,000 over 8y, 44% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC: $163,406 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetLUBBOCK IMPACT INC: $161,360 over 4y, 7.5% of budgetLUBBOCK BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB INC: $140,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetMUSEUM OF TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION: $138,200 over 4y, 12% of budgetSilent Wings Museum Foundation Inc: $134,867 over 5y, 54% of budgetBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $131,400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $125,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetINSIDE OUT FOUNDATION: $120,000 over 8y, 9.9% of budgetREFUGE SERVICES INC: $117,600 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetSCIENCE SPECTRUM INC: $111,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetWAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $110,024 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF LUBBOCK INC: $100,585 over 4y, 9.8% of budgetSHELBYS BRIDGE: $99,500 over 4y, 16% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $81,921 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LUBBOCK PUBLIC LIBRARY INC: $79,975 over 4y, 10% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH PLAINS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LUBBOCK ↗
  • Who funds LUBBOCK AREA UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds BALLET LUBBOCK ↗
  • Who funds LEVELLAND WALLACE THEATER ↗
  • Who funds LUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LUBBOCK SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEER CENTER OF LUBBOCK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LOUISE HOPKINS UNDERWOOD CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds EARLY LEARNING CENTERS OF LUBBOCK INC ↗
  • Who funds LUBBOCK CHILDRENS HEALTH CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds Texas Interscholastic League Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LUBBOCK ARTS ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds LUBBOCK MOONLIGHT MUSICALS INC ↗
  • Who funds Alstrom Angels ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTH TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHARLES ADAMS STUDIO PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH PLAINS CLOSING THE GAPS P-20 COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds LUBBOCK EXPERIENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH POINT VILLAGE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Helen Jones Foundatio…Diekemper Family Foun…HDS FoundationSouth Plains Foundati…Texas Instruments Fou…Kuykendall FoundationWelborn-Payne Endowme…Rea Charitable TrustGarrison Family Found…Rushing Family Founda…Civic Lubbock Inc
Community Foundation of West TexasTX88.3× affinity41 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of West Texas · Helen Jones Foundation Inc · Diekemper Family Foundation Inc · HDS Foundation · South Plains Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Kuykendall Foundation · Welborn-Payne Endowment Trust · Rea Charitable Trust · Garrison Family Foundation · Rushing Family Foundation · Civic Lubbock Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ch Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ch Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    26report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ch Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Ch Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 211 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ch’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home