Skip to content

Washington · Private foundation

Cgmk Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$187k
Granted FY2023
11
Grants FY2023
11
Organizations funded FY2023
9%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Cgmk Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Cgmk Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $187k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’19
8
’20
9
’21
8
’22
7
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2023
$3,000
Largest grant, FY2023
$146,000
Organizations funded a year
10 to 13
FY2019 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
7
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 9% of the organizations Cgmk Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 1% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
AnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202311$187k9%
FY202211$194k27%
FY202113$200k23%
FY202011$185k9%
FY201910$185kn/a
92% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Philanthropy$2.7MAnimals$825kEnvironment$93kEducation$10kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
MT
IL
CA
NM
DC
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 12 grantees
All grantees of Cgmk Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc$712,00051%
The Vital Ground Foundation Inc$50,00050%
Greenpeace Fund Inc$40,00030%
Alaska Conservation Foundation$25,00050%
WIDECAST Wider Caribbean Sea Turtle Conservation Network Inc$20,00021%
Alliance for Tompotika Conservation$15,00051%
University of Washington Foundation$10,00010%
International Snow Leopard Trust$8,00050%
Puget Soundkeeper Alliance$3,00030%
Baahaus Animal Rescue Group$1,0002n/a
Sheep Sanctuary Inc$1,0002n/a
Jills Farm Animal Rescue$5001n/a

Plus 6 recipients with no EIN on record ($64k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Cgmk Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWildlife Conservation Network Inc: $712,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetThe Vital Ground Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetGreenpeace Fund Inc: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAlaska Conservation Foundation: $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWIDECAST Wider Caribbean Sea Turtle Conservation Network Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAlliance for Tompotika Conservation: $15,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetUniversity of Washington Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Snow Leopard Trust: $8,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPuget Soundkeeper Alliance: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mightycause Charitable FoundationFL12× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Cgmk Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Cgmk Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Cgmk Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Cgmk Foundation

How much does Cgmk Foundation give?
Cgmk Foundation reported 11 grants totaling $186,500 in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 10 and 13 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2023.
What does Cgmk Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2023, its largest causes are Philanthropy (74%), Animals (23%), Environment (3%).
Who are Cgmk Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2023: Wildlife Conservation Network Inc ($712k), The Vital Ground Foundation Inc ($50k), Greenpeace Fund Inc ($40k).
Does Cgmk Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 9% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Cgmk Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Cgmk Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Mightycause Charitable Foundation, American Endowment Foundation, Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc.
Where is Cgmk Foundation based?
Cgmk Foundation is based in WA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cgmk’s filings →

More from the funding graph