· Public charity
Century Club of San Diego
Century Club of San Diego (Century Club), is a California nonprofit public benefit corporation exempt under Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3) organized and operated for charitable purposes.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $1,035,349 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,061,564 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $26,215 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k6 grants · $163k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $573k
- $250k+1 grant · $300k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ARMED SERVICES YMCA SD | $300,000 |
| REALITY CHANGERS | $201,228 |
| SUPPORT THE ENLISTED PROJECT | $162,829 |
| WORDS ALIVE | $148,298 |
| BARRIO LOGAN COLLEGE INSTITUT | $60,195 |
| APGA FOUNDATION | $45,715 |
| NEW HAVEN YOUTH & FAMILY | $30,633 |
| PROMISES2KIDS | $30,000 |
| FIRST TEE OF SAN DIEGO | $22,451 |
| BLACK COLLEGE GOLF COACHES AS | $17,000 |
| WOMEN IN GOLF FOUNDATION | $17,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +70% since the first grant, against +44% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JIJUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH8× · 2017–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +209%
- SDSAN DIEGO YOUTH SERVICES8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +76%
- PKPRO KIDS GOLF ACADEMY INC9× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +70%
Funded once
- VFVOICES FOR CHILDRENgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $426k · revenue +44%
- MSMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECTgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $79k · revenue +89%
- HFHORSCHEL FAMILY FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2024 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Through the game of golf and its intrinsic values of sportsmanship, discipline and integrity, the san diego county junior golf association's mission is to enrich the lives of youth through education, training and competition.
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.
Mission Statement & Exempt Purpose: First Tee - Silicon Valley develops youth through golf. We enable kids and teens to build the strength of character that empowers them through a lifetime of new challenges. By seamlessly integrating the…
Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…
The mission of San Dieguito Surf Soccer is to provide equitable access to high-quality soccer programs that promote athletic development, personal growth, and community engagement. As a nonprofit organization, we are committed to removing…
Impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what.
Our mission is to transform junior golf by providing a platform for junior players to gain access to exceptional high school caddies that provide youth mentorship for the future of the game.
The organization's mission is to introduce the game of golf to young people between the ages of 7 and 17 who live and attend school in monterey county. provide low-cost clinics, course play and tournaments. approximately 1,500 junior…
In the prior years, the association had received permanently restricted funds for the joe salazar jimenez memorial golf scholarship endowment fund (50,000)and joe conrad (25,000).
The policy & innovation center's (pic) mission is to unlock the region's potential by cultivating and building partnerships. our niche is to address intractable issues that can only be solved with cross-sector, multi-jurisdictional…
First graduate's mission is to help students become the first in their families to graduate from college ready to pursue a career that is meaningful to them. we are a 12-year+ free program-recruiting students in 6th grade. offerings…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Diego Youth Services and the most unlike its peers is The National First Responders Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO YOUTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds PRO KIDS GOLF ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds SUPPORT THE ENLISTED PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds New Haven Youth and Family Services Inc ↗
- Who funds PROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Words Alive ↗
- Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Boys to Men Mentoring Network Inc ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL ADVOCATES FOR YOUTH SAN DIEGO INC ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds REALITY CHANGERS ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO REGIONAL FIRE & EMERGENCY ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds RICKIE FOWLER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BLACK COLLEGE GOLF COACHES ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WOMEN IN GOLF FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
- Who funds FIREFIGHTERAID FKA SAN DIEGO FIREFIGHTERS BENEVOLENT FUND ↗
- Who funds APGA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT ↗
- Who funds BARRIO LOGAN COLLEGE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER THAN TECH ↗
- Who funds HORSCHEL FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE SCGA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DEL SOL LIONS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds The National First Responders Fund ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF ROLLO ↗
- Who funds NORTH COUNTY JUNIOR GOLF ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF SAN DIEGO INC ↗
- Who funds MISSION BAY HIGH SCHOOL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · Boys and Girls Aid Society of San Diego Ltd · Walter J & Betty C Zable Foundation · David C Copley Foundation · Leichtag Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Century Club of San Diego funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Century Club of San Diego?
Find your warmest path to Century Club of San Diego through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.