Skip to content
Central Vermont Medical Center Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Central Vermont Medical Center Inc

Cvmc works collaboratively to meet the needs and improve the health of the residents of central vermont.

$341k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.2MEducation$138kEnvironment$81kCommunity Improvement$45kFood & Nutrition$35kHuman Services$30kHousing & Shelter$18kPhilanthropy$18k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $185,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $340,549 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $155,549 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $35k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$150,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$190M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ONE ARTS COMMUNITY SCHOOLS$150,000
PEOPLES HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION: $15k → 9%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION: $15k → 9%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION: $15k → 9%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION: $15k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 64% of Central Vermont Medical Center Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in VT; by stated purpose, 36%.

Central Vermont Medical Center Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 5 repeat orgs$281k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$1.5M
$131k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+17%

Still filing today

80%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WASHINGTON COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1.0M · revenue +63%
  • PH
    PEOPLE'S HEALTH AND WELLNESS CLINIC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $263k · revenue +13%
  • CC
    CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $60k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • GM
    GREEN MOUNTAIN TRANSIT
    one grant, 2017 · $81k
  • GM
    GREEN MOUNTAIN UNITED WAY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $18k · revenue +16%
  • DH
    DOWNSTREET HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $18k · revenue +69%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southeastern Vermont Community Action Inc

Sevca's mission is to partner with individuals and communities to alleviate the hardships of poverty, provide opportunities to grow and thrive, and eliminiate causes of poverty in southeastern vermont.

Human Services
2
Cooperation Vermont

The mission of cooperation vermont is to build thriving community economic and enviromental democracy.

Community Improvement
3
The University of Vermont Medical Center

To improve the health of the people in the communities we serve by integrating patient care, education, and research in a caring environment.

Health
4
Cooperation Vermont Community Land Trust

The mission of cooperation vermont community land trust is to reclaim the commons.

Community Improvement
5
Homeshare Vermont Inc

The organization provides a comprehensive screening and matching service and ongoing support once people decide to homeshare. this allows elders and other people to stay at home while helping people find an affordable place to live.

Human Services
6
Westchester Community Opportunity Program Inc

To mobilize and efficiently manage resources through partnerships and collaborations to help the low-income and at-risk populations in the hudson valley region to achieve greater self-sufficiency.

Community Improvement
7
Elevate Youth Services Inc

Elevate's mission is to promote safety, competence, and confidence as youth create their path through adolescence and into adulthood.elevate provides a wide range of innovative and effective programs that empower and enrich the lives of…

Human Services
8
Vermont Achievement Center Inc

Through flexible, diverse and responsive programs, vermont achievement center, inc. (vac) provides a foundation of life skills to prepare individuals to reach their full potential as contributing members of society. all people are capable…

Education
9
Vermont Family Network Inc

Vfn's mission is to empower and support all vermont families of children with special needs.

Human Services
10
Central Vermont Medical Center Inc

Cvmc works collaboratively to meet the needs and improve the health of the residents of central vermont.

Health
11
Pathways Vermont Inc

To end homelessness in vermont and provide innovative mental health alternatives.

Human Services
12
Health Care & Rehabilitation Services of Southeastern Vt Inc

Hcrs' mission is to provide creative, collaborative, and compassionate health care services that are responsive to the needs of our communities.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vermont Youth Conservation Corps Inc; the most unlike its peers is One Arts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WASHINGTON COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $1,001,500 · OtherWASHINGTON COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INCUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE: $138,010 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGEGREEN MOUNTAIN TRANSIT: $81,141 · OtherGREEN MOUNTAIN TRANSITPEOPLE'S HEALTH AND WELLNESS CLINIC: $263,000 · HealthPEOPLE'S HEALTH …ONE ARTS INC: $150,000 · Arts & CultureONE ARTS …CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesVERMONT YOUTH CONSERVATION CORPS INC: $34,554 · EnvironmentGREEN MOUNTAIN UNITED WAY INC: $17,500 · PhilanthropyDOWNSTREET HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $17,500 · Housing & ShelterWASHINGTON COUNTY FAMILY CENTER: $15,000 · Education
Other$1,220,651Health$263,000Arts & Culture$150,000Human Services$60,000Environment$34,554Philanthropy$17,500Housing & Shelter$17,500Education$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $1,001,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetPEOPLE'S HEALTH AND WELLNESS CLINIC: $263,000 over 9y, 12% of budgetONE ARTS INC: $150,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetCAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVERMONT YOUTH CONSERVATION CORPS INC: $34,554 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGREEN MOUNTAIN UNITED WAY INC: $17,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetDOWNSTREET HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $17,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY FAMILY CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community…National Life Group C…Ben & Jerry's Foundat…Marvin L and Norma J …S & C Harvest Foundat…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Vermont Community FoundationVT19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · National Life Group Charitable Foundation Inc · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · Marvin L and Norma J Hathaway Foundation Inc · S & C Harvest Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Central Vermont Medical Center Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Central Vermont Medical Center Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Capstone Community Action Inc: 84% of income from government
  • Vermont Youth Conservation Corps Inc: 47% of income from government
  • Green Mountain United Way Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Downstreet Housing and Community Development Inc: 7% of income from government
  • People's Health and Wellness Clinic: 2% of income from government
  • Washington County Mental Health Services Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Central Vermont Medical Center’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home