Skip to content
Central Oregon Health Council at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Central Oregon Health Council

To improve the quality and efficiency of healthcare delivery for, and the health outcomes of, community members in the central oregon region, which may include all or a portion of crook, deschutes, jefferson and klamath counties.

$6.4M
Granted FY2019
33
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$9.0MHuman Services$2.2MHousing & Shelter$1.5MCommunity Improvement$581kEducation$515kFood & Nutrition$368kYouth Development$300kPhilanthropy$163kOther$0
02FY2019 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $266k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+8 grants · $4.7M
$90,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HIGH DESERT ESD$1,476,620
CROOK COUNTY$1,057,136
Individual grant recipient$494,000
ST CHARLES HEALTH SYSTEM$395,554
OR HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVER$350,000
DESCHUTES COUNTY$341,934
PAIN ADVISORS$300,000
EARLY LEARNING HUB$299,646
HIGH DESERT FOOD & FARM ALLIA$217,432
FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN$150,000
JEFFERSON CO PUBLIC HEALTH$150,000
RIMROCK TRAILS$141,915
DAWNS HOUSE$112,945
HEALTHY BEGINNINGS$102,611
THE CENTER FOUNDATION$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $297k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%REDEMPTION HOUSE MINISTRIES: $22k → 11%BETTER TOGETHER CENTRAL OR: $113k → 10%NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT: $90k → 10%THRIVE CENTRAL OREGON: $51k → 10%THRIVE CENTRAL OREGON: $22k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.7M · 14 repeat orgs$6.1M to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2019, 4 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
16

Total granted

$8.7M
$3.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+123%
+178%

Still filing today

71%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    BETHLEHEM INN
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1.0M · revenue +27%
  • SC
    St Charles Health System Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $491k · revenue +53%
  • High Desert Food & Farm Alliance
    3× · 2017–2019 · $323k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • BESTCARE TREATMENT SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2.4M · revenue +244%
  • PS
    PACIFIC SOURCE
    one grant, 2018 · $457k
  • JC
    JEFFERSON COUNTY YOUTH ORGANIZATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $271k · revenue -17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eastern Oregon Health and Wellness Inc

Eastern oregon health & wellness provides recovery housing and outpatient services that support individuals and families impacted by substance use disorder through safe housing, trauma-informed care, and community-based support.

Health
2
Home Share Oregon

To connect homeowners with a spare bedroom to rent and home seekers in need of affordable housing

Housing & Shelter
3
Dental3 All Smiles Community Oral Health

Dental3 is dedicated to collaboratively improving oral health access and equity, with a focus on underserved communities, through the coordination and provision of community based oral health services for Medicaid eligible individuals and…

Health
4
Oregon Public Health Association

Advocate for policies that protect and promote healthy and health equity for all people in oregon and provide learning, collaboration and leadership opportunities for public health professionals and the broader community.

Health
5
Adapt

Provide our communities open access to world class primary care, addictions treatment, and behavior health care to promote health and restore lives, without regard for the ability to pay.

—
6
Central Oregon Veteran & Community Outreach Inc

Outreach to homeless and at risk veterans and individuals

Housing & Shelter
7
Central Oregon Villages

Central oregon villages mission is to advocate for and provide safe and secure shelter, housing and related services in central oreogn for the unhoused populations or at risk of becoming unhoused.

Housing & Shelter
8
Oregon Council for Behavioral Health

We provide a voice for an effective and accessible behavioral health system of care for Oregonians.

Community Improvement
9
Restoration House Inc

Restoration House provides save, supervised housing for men with significant behavioral health needs, creating a stable environment where structure, accountability, and wraparound services support personal growth and long-term recovery.…

Health
10
Options for Southern Oregon

Programs for people of all ages who have mental health needs. Our holistic approach addresses housing, advocacy, community integration, crisis intervention, therapy, co-occuring issues, education, work & economic well-being

Health
11
Bend-Redmond Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. Bend-Redmond Habitat for Humanity adheres…

Housing & Shelter
12
Oregon Energy Systems Technology and Research
Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thrive Central Oregon; the most unlike its peers is Boost Oregon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
23/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF DESCHUTES COUNTY: $2,035,176 · OtherUNITED WAY OF DESCHUTES COUNTYHIGH DESERT ESD: $1,851,266 · OtherHIGH DESERT ESDDESCHUTES COUNTY: $1,079,671 · OtherDESCHUTES COUNTYCROOK COUNTY: $1,071,173 · OtherCROOK COUNTYIndividual grant recipient: $494,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPACIFIC SOURCE: $457,294 · OtherOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $350,000 · OtherPAIN ADVISORS: $300,000 · Other+23 more: $1,324,543 · Other+23 moreBESTCARE TREATMENT SERVICES INC: $2,371,000 · HealthBESTCARE TREATMENT SERVIC…St Charles Health System Inc: $490,554 · HealthSt Charles Health System …MOSAIC COMMUNITY HEALTH: $320,510 · HealthMOSAIC COMMUNITY HEALTHRIMROCK TRAILS TREATMENT SERVICES: $141,915 · Health+2 more: $61,200 · HealthBETHLEHEM INN: $1,000,000 · Housing & ShelterJERICHO ROAD INC: $45,700 · Housing & Shelter+2 more: $25,877 · Housing & ShelterJEFFERSON COUNTY YOUTH ORGANIZATION INC: $271,254 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN- CENTRAL OREGON: $225,000 · Youth DevelopmentHigh Desert Food & Farm Alliance: $323,310 · Food & NutritionTHE GIVING PLATE: $30,000 · Food & NutritionBetter Together Central Oregon: $113,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORIMPACT: $90,000 · Human ServicesTHRIVE CENTRAL OREGON: $72,777 · Human ServicesREDEMPTION HOUSE MINISTRIES: $21,600 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationBOOST OREGON: $77,275 · EducationJEFFERSON COUNTY FAITH BASED NETWORK: $45,000 · Education
Other$8,963,123Health$3,385,179Housing & Shelter$1,071,577Youth Development$496,254Food & Nutrition$353,310Human Services$297,377Education$222,275

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBESTCARE TREATMENT SERVICES INC: $2,371,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetUNITED WAY OF DESCHUTES COUNTY: $2,035,176 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBETHLEHEM INN: $1,000,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetSt Charles Health System Inc: $490,554 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOSAIC COMMUNITY HEALTH: $320,510 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN- CENTRAL OREGON: $225,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetCOMMUTE OPTIONS: $123,640 over 1y, 19% of budgetBetter Together Central Oregon: $113,000 over 1y, 49% of budgetDeschutes County Healthy Beginnings Inc: $102,611 over 1y, 35% of budgetTHE CENTER FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetNEIGHBORIMPACT: $90,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEAST CASCADES WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD: $90,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetBOOST OREGON: $77,275 over 1y, 33% of budgetKEMPLE MEMORIAL CHILDREN'S CLINIC: $50,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetA SMILE FOR KIDS: $50,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetJERICHO ROAD INC: $45,700 over 3y, 14% of budgetJEFFERSON COUNTY FAITH BASED NETWORK: $45,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetSISTERS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $24,510 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetREDEMPTION HOUSE MINISTRIES: $21,600 over 1y, 14% of budgetNATURECONNECT CENTRAL OREGON: $20,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetKOR COMMUNITY LAND TRUST DBA ROOTEDHOMES: $13,877 over 1y, 12% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of La Pine Sunriver: $12,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSHEPHERD'S HOUSE MINISTRIES: $12,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLA PINE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $11,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAgricultural Research Foundation: $6,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Charles Health Sys…The Oregon Community …The Roundhouse Founda…The Ford Family Found…The Autzen FoundationUnited Way of Deschut…Maybelle Clark Macdon…First Interstate Banc…Meyer Memorial TrustThe Anjulicia Foundat…Pacificsource Foundat…The Collins Foundation
St Charles Health System IncOR55.6× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Charles Health System Inc · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · United Way of Deschutes County · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Anjulicia Foundation · Pacificsource Foundation for Health Improvement · The Collins Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Central Oregon Health Council funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Central Oregon Health Council. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 19%
  • East Cascades Workforce Investment Board: 86% of income from government
  • Neighborimpact: 68% of income from government
  • Kor Community Land Trust Dba Rootedhomes: 63% of income from government
  • High Desert Food & Farm Alliance: 45% of income from government
  • Bestcare Treatment Services Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Dawns House Corporation Llc: 27% of income from government
  • Boost Oregon: 22% of income from government
  • Commute Options: 21% of income from government
  • A Smile for Kids: 19% of income from government
  • Rimrock Trails Treatment Services: 18% of income from government
  • La Pine Community Health Center: 18% of income from government
  • Friends of the Children- Central Oregon: 16% of income from government
  • Redemption House Ministries: 14% of income from government
  • Thrive Central Oregon: 12% of income from government
  • Mosaic Community Health: 8% of income from government
  • Bethlehem Inn: 0% of income from government
  • St Charles Health System Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $4.9M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2019, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Central Oregon Health Council’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home