Skip to content
Center for Early Detection of Cancer Inc Dba the Ratner Family Foundation for Cul at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Center for Early Detection of Cancer Inc Dba the Ratner Family Foundation for Cul

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$18k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$160kHealth$68kScience & Tech$50kPhilanthropy$26kReligion$25kEducation$15kEnvironment$15kInternational$3k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$18,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ELLEN HERMANSON FOUNDATION$18,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YAMBA MALAWI INC: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
3
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
4
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
5
The Jewish Studio Project

Through thought leadership, community programs, leadership development, and organizational partnerships, jsp is building a movement to activate the creative power of the jewish community.

Religion
6
The Jewish Wisdom Foundation

To create a dynamic community of Jews, nourished by mutual respect and honest, open dialogue, challenging stereotypes, invigorating curiosity, plumbing the depths of their great heritage and empowering a revolution in Jewish identity. In…

Education
7
The Torah and Nature Foundation

The torah and nature foundation is dedicated to advancing religious, charitable, scientific, literary, and educational pursuits.

Religion
8
The Foundation for the Preservation of the History of the Jewish People in
Arts & Culture
9
Joseph and Malka Melohn Foundation
—
10
The Milstein Family Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Brooklyn Inst of Arts & Sciences Trust
Philanthropy
12
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust; the most unlike its peers is Bialystok Cemetery Restoration Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST: $80,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVI…SING FOR HOPE INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureSING FOR HOPE INCUAP NORTH AMERICA LTD: $40,000 · OtherUAP NORTH AMERICA LTDRESCUE LUNG RESCUE LIFE SOCIETY: $25,000 · OtherRESCUE LUNG RESCUE LIFE SOCIETYMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER: $25,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCERBIALYSTOK CEMETERY RESTORATION FUND INC: $10,000 · OtherBIALYSTOK CEMETERY RESTORATION F…SIGNATURE THEATRE: $5,000 · OtherCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $50,000 · Science & TechCOLD SPRING HAR…TIDES FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDAT…THE ELLEN P HERMANSON FOUNDATION: $18,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ELLEN P H…+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropySTORAHTELLING LAB SHUL INC: $25,000 · ReligionMOHONK PRESERVE INC: $15,000 · EnvironmentTHE BLACK INSTITUTE INC: $15,000 · EducationYAMBA MALAWI INC: $2,500 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$105,000Other$105,000Science & Tech$50,000Philanthropy$44,000Religion$25,000Environment$15,000Education$15,000Human Services$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST: $80,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSING FOR HOPE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetSTORAHTELLING LAB SHUL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE ELLEN P HERMANSON FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetMOHONK PRESERVE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BLACK INSTITUTE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetYAMBA MALAWI INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP BROOKLYN FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Phil…Jewish Communal FundNational Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY14.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Center for Early Detection of Cancer Inc Dba the Ratner Family Foundation for Cul funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Center for Early Detection of Cancer Inc Dba the Ratner Family Foundation for Cul. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Center for Early Detection of Cancer Inc Dba the Ratner Family Foundation for Cul’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home