Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Center for Early Detection of Cancer Inc Dba the Ratner Family Foundation for Cul

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$18k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What you fund
0171% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20182024.

Arts & Culture$105kScience & Tech$50kPhilanthropy$44kReligion$25kEnvironment$15kEducation$15kHuman Services$3kOther$105k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$18,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ELLEN HERMANSON FOUNDATION$18,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YAMBA MALAWI INC: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
3
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
4
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
5
The Jewish Studio Project

Through thought leadership, community programs, leadership development, and organizational partnerships, jsp is building a movement to activate the creative power of the jewish community.

Religion
6
The Jewish Wisdom Foundation

To create a dynamic community of Jews, nourished by mutual respect and honest, open dialogue, challenging stereotypes, invigorating curiosity, plumbing the depths of their great heritage and empowering a revolution in Jewish identity. In…

Education
7
The Torah and Nature Foundation

The torah and nature foundation is dedicated to advancing religious, charitable, scientific, literary, and educational pursuits.

Religion
8
The Foundation for the Preservation of the History of the Jewish People in
Arts & Culture
9
Joseph and Malka Melohn Foundation
10
The Milstein Family Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Brooklyn Inst of Arts & Sciences Trust
Philanthropy
12
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust and the most unlike its peers is Bialystok Cemetery Restoration Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST — $80,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVI…SING FOR HOPE INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureSING FOR HOPE INCUAP NORTH AMERICA LTD — $40,000 · OtherUAP NORTH AMERICA LTDMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER — $25,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCERRESCUE LUNG RESCUE LIFE SOCIETY — $25,000 · OtherRESCUE LUNG RESCUE LIFE SOCIETYBIALYSTOK CEMETERY RESTORATION FUND INC — $10,000 · OtherBIALYSTOK CEMETERY RESTORATION F…SIGNATURE THEATRE — $5,000 · OtherCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY — $50,000 · Science & TechCOLD SPRING HAR…TIDES FOUNDATION — $25,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDAT…THE ELLEN P HERMANSON FOUNDATION — $18,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ELLEN P H…+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropySTORAHTELLING LAB SHUL INC — $25,000 · ReligionMOHONK PRESERVE INC — $15,000 · EnvironmentTHE BLACK INSTITUTE INC — $15,000 · EducationYAMBA MALAWI INC — $2,500 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$105,000Other$105,000Science & Tech$50,000Philanthropy$44,000Religion$25,000Environment$15,000Education$15,000Human Services$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST — $80,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTORAHTELLING LAB SHUL INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSING FOR HOPE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetTHE ELLEN P HERMANSON FOUNDATION — $18,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetMOHONK PRESERVE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BLACK INSTITUTE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetYAMBA MALAWI INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP BROOKLYN FUND INC — $1,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY14.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Center for Early Detection of Cancer Inc Dba the Ratner Family Foundation for Cul funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph