· Public charity
Center for Central American Empowerment Inc
To create, operate or support projects that benefit people in need, with a strong focus in the central american isthmus, comprised of guatemala, honduras, nicaragua, el salvador, costa rica, belize, and panama, with a particular emphasis on creating and/or supporting projects that benefit women, girls, and families to break the cycle of…
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k6 grants · $88k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $668k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EL PORVENIR | $120,000 |
| GOD'S CHILD PROJECT | $104,000 |
| ALDEA | $100,000 |
| HOPE FOR A HEALTHIER HUMANITY FNDN | $95,000 |
| PORCH DE SALOMON | $83,770 |
| COVENANT HOUSE | $60,000 |
| UNITED IN HOPE | $55,000 |
| L'ARCHE USA | $50,000 |
| SAFE PASSAGE | $20,000 |
| CREAMOS NORTE | $20,000 |
| LAZOS EDUCATION FUND | $15,000 |
| NINOS DEL LAGO | $12,500 |
| WINGS | $10,000 |
| THE FRIENDS OF BATAHOLA | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $607k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCOVENANT HOUSE8× · 2017–2024 · $491k · revenue +34%
- EPEL PORVENIR7× · 2018–2024 · $384k · revenue +35%
- PDPORCH DE SALOMON CORPORATION8× · 2017–2024 · $337k · revenue +81%
Funded once
- LULArche USAone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
- CNCreamos Norteone grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Breaking the cycle of poverty in Guatemala through education of impoverished children through education.
Schooling & educational experience
Medical relief and health education
Serving Families in Guatemala living in extreme poverty with nutrition, education and self-reliance to help empower and lift them
Nueva Generacin supports low-income families in Guatemala through scholarships education and family support
Comprehensive development organization designed to promote dignity, community and self-sufficiency while facilitating access to health care, education and livable wages in marginalized Honduran communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope for a Healthier Humanity Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hearts Touching Heartsfoundationinc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds EL PORVENIR ↗
- Who funds PORCH DE SALOMON CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Safe Passage ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOR A HEALTHIER HUMANITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALDEA ADVANCING LOCAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH EMPOWERMENT AND ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds WOMENS INTERNATIONAL NETWORK FOR GUATEMALAN SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Ninos del Lago ↗
- Who funds Unidos Por La Esperanza-United In Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds Batahola Friends of ↗
- Who funds Lazos Inc ↗
- Who funds LArche USA ↗
- Who funds HEARTS TOUCHING HEARTSFOUNDATIONINC ↗
- Who funds Creamos Norte ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Luis Von Ahn Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Center for Central American Empowerment Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Center for Central American Empowerment Inc?
Find your warmest path to Center for Central American Empowerment Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.