Skip to content

· Public charity

Cdphp Foundation Inc

The foundation was organized for the purpose of improving health and well-being of the community through awareness, prevention, wellness, education and other programs focused on health priorities.

$82k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$296kCommunity Improvement$250kHealth$225kHuman Services$98kArts & Culture$14kPhilanthropy$10k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $46k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $63k
$35,543
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAPITAL REGION CHAMBER FOUNDATION$62,500
UNIVERSITY AT ALBANY FOUNDATION$35,543
ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%UNITED WAY GREATER CAPITAL REGION: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$729k · 5 repeat orgs$163k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
5

Total granted

$729k
$163k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+15%

Still filing today

60%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UA
    UNIVERSITY AT ALBANY FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $296k · revenue +126%
  • CR
    CAPITAL REGION CHAMBER FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $250k · revenue -1%
  • AC
    ADDICTIONS CARE CENTER OF ALBANY INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $100k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • 8R
    820 RIVER STREET INC
    one grant, 2022 · $55k · revenue +23%
  • FY
    FAMILY YMCA OF THE GLENS FALLS AREA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $55k · revenue +49%
  • FA
    FAMILY AND CHILD SERVICE OF SCHENECTADY
    one grant, 2018 · $38k · revenue -2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Allegany Council On Alcoholism - Substance Abuse Inc

Maintain residence programs for recovering alcoholics and other drug abusers who are in need of a continued structured environment which includes recovery homes and counseling services.

—
2
Twin County Recovery Services Inc

Twin county recovery services, inc. exists to help alleviate the devastating effects of chemical dependency in the communities of columbia and greene counties. a private, non-profit organization incorporated in 1974, its programs are…

—
3
United Way of Central New York Inc

To improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of our community.

Philanthropy
4
Addictions Care Foundation

The addictions care foundation is organized and operated exclusively for the charitable purpose of supporting and assisting the work of the addictions care center of albany, inc. (acca) on addiction and other chemical dependencies.

Health
5
United Way Foundation of the Capital Region

The United Way Foundation of the Capital Region (the Foundation) was established with the purpose of supporting the mission of the United Way by soliciting, investing and maintaining funds designated by the board or donors to function as…

—
6
Community Reach Center Inc

Community reach center's mission is to enhance the health of our community.

Health
7
Cattaraugus Rehabilitation Center Inc

The corporation was formed to operate various programs to assist in the development of the mentally and physically disabled. we assist the people we serve through a continuum of service that fosters community participation and personal…

Human Services
8
Albany County Opportunity Inc

Acap works in partnership with families and communities to empower people to achieve economic self-sufficiency and an improved quality of life.

Human Services
9
Albany General Hospital Foundation

The foundation's specific purpose is to solicit, receive, and maintain gifts of money and property, and to make decisions on the distributions of such money and property, to support albany general hospital and health svcs in the general…

Health
10
Food Bank of Central New York

Food bank of central new york is a not-for-profit organization: our mission is to lead the effort to eliminate hunger in our region, through partnerships with others in our community, through education, advocacy, and distribution of…

Food & Nutrition
11
Upper Albany Main Street Program Inc

We preserve, revitalize, and support the commercial district, creating a center of choiceby collaborating with residents and stakeholders to foster a successful community.

Community Improvement
12
Western New York United Against Drug & Alcohol Abuse Inc

To increase public awareness of drug and alcohol abuse, conduct programs for the prevention of drug and alcohol abuse and to work on community based solutions to these problems.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Addictions Care Center of Albany Inc; the most unlike its peers is 820 River Street Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY AT ALBANY FOUNDATION: $295,586 · EducationUNIVERSITY AT ALBANY FOUNDATIONCAPITAL REGION CHAMBER FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 · EducationCAPITAL REGION CHAMBER FOUNDATION INCFAMILY AND CHILD SERVICE OF SCHENECTADY: $37,725 · EducationFAMILY AND CHILD SERVICE OF SCHENECTADYALBANY MED HEALTH SYSTEM: $70,000 · OtherALBANY MED HEALTH SYSTEM820 RIVER STREET INC: $55,000 · Other820 RIVER STREET INCFAMILY YMCA OF THE GLENS FALLS AREA INC: $55,000 · OtherFAMILY YMCA OF THE GLENS …SINCLAIR BROADCAST GROUP: $13,750 · OtherSINCLAIR BROADCAST GROUP+1 more: $5,115 · OtherADDICTIONS CARE CENTER OF ALBANY INC: $100,000 · HealthADDICTIONS C…UNITED WAY OF THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION: $10,000 · Human Services
Education$583,311Other$198,865Health$100,000Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY AT ALBANY FOUNDATION: $295,586 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCAPITAL REGION CHAMBER FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetADDICTIONS CARE CENTER OF ALBANY INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budget820 RIVER STREET INC: $55,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFAMILY YMCA OF THE GLENS FALLS AREA INC: $55,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetFAMILY AND CHILD SERVICE OF SCHENECTADY: $37,725 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region IncNY15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Capital District Physicians' Health Plan Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cdphp Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cdphp Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cdphp Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Cdphp Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cdphp’s filings →

    More from the funding graph