Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cc Pascal Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$474kReligion$130kArts & Culture$46kHealth$30kHuman Services$17kEducation$12kRecreation & Sports$3kPublic Benefit$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,050
Median grant
1
States reached
$309k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOMINICAN SISTERS VISION OF HOPE$5,000
ORDER OF MALTA$3,500
OUR MOTHER OF GOOD COUNSEL$3,050
ST VENCENT DE PAUL LA$2,500
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LA$2,500
ST JOHN OF GOD$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ST ANNE'S: $5k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LA: $10k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LA: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$199k · 8 repeat orgs$516k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
17

Total granted

$199k
$516k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+25%

Still filing today

50%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentReligionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    THE INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED CATHOLIC STUDIES
    2× · 2021–2023 · $62k · revenue -28%
  • BA
    BELLEVUE ART MUSEUM
    2× · 2020–2021 · $46k · revenue -28%
  • DS
    DOMINICAN SISTERS VISION OF HOPE
    4× · 2020–2024 · $34k

Funded once

  • GP
    GF PASCAL FAMILY FOUNDATION-SANFORD BERNSTEIN DFA
    one grant, 2022 · $473k
  • UC
    USC CATHOLIC CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • MH
    MARYVALE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Our Lady of the Woods Corporation

To operate a private school for age 3 through eighth grade students.

—
3
Childrens Center at Burke Gilman Gardens

The Children's Center is committed to helping children of all backgrounds grow into enthusiastic, kind and confident learners by providing a broad curriculum designed to enhance their social, physical and cognitive development. The…

Unclassified
4
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
5
Artesia Classical Academy Inc

In partnership with parents, Artesia Classical Academy equips students to be Christlike disciples and servant-leaders who know and share God's Word.

Education
6
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
7
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
8
Cascades Academy of Central Oregon

Cascades academy is an engaged, vibrant community that weaves challenging academics with experiential learning to inspire socially responsible individuals ready for a diverse and changing world.

Education
9
Berkeley Hall School Foundation

Our mission is to "empower children to fulfill their unlimited, god-given potential as fearless scholars and conscientious citizens."

Education
10
Occidental College

See schedule othe mission of occidental college is to provide a gifted and diverse group of students with a total educational experience of the highest quality - one that prepares them for leadership in an increasingly complex,…

Education
11
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
12
La Scuola International School

Inspire brave learners to shape the future.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pasadena Child Development Associates Inc doing business as Pcda; the most unlike its peers is Lake Washington Youth Baseball Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GF PASCAL FAMILY FOUNDATION-SANFORD BERNSTEIN DFA: $472,899 · OtherGF PASCAL FAMILY FOUNDATION-SANFORD BERNSTEIN DFADOMINICAN SISTERS VISION OF HOPE: $33,500 · OtherDOMINICAN SISTERS VISION OF HOPE+13 more: $53,800 · Other+13 moreTHE INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED CATHOLIC STUDIES: $62,250 · ReligionTHE INSTI…BELLEVUE ART MUSEUM: $46,000 · Arts & CultureOrder of Malta Clinic of Northern California: $20,264 · HealthHUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES: $1,000 · HealthCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesSt Anne's Family Services: $4,500 · Human ServicesCASCADIA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,500 · EducationPAGE AHEAD CHILDRENS LITERACY PRGM: $2,500 · EducationPasadena Child Development Associates Inc doing business as PCDA: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentLAKE WASHINGTON YOUTH BASEBALL CLUB: $1,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$560,199Religion$62,250Arts & Culture$46,000Health$21,264Human Services$17,000Education$5,000Youth Development$2,000Recreation & Sports$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED CATHOLIC STUDIES: $62,250 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetBELLEVUE ART MUSEUM: $46,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetOrder of Malta Clinic of Northern California: $20,264 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASCADIA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPAGE AHEAD CHILDRENS LITERACY PRGM: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPasadena Child Development Associates Inc doing business as PCDA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROSE BOWL AQUATICS CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKINDERING CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA15.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Pasadena Community Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cc Pascal Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cc Pascal Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cc Pascal’s filings →

    More from the funding graph