Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cbis Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$277k
Granted FY2026still arriving
4
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$135k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$1.1MEducation$1.0MHealth$130kHuman Services$55kRecreation & Sports$18kMembership Benefit$5kPhilanthropy$4k
02FY2026 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $42k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $235k
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EXODUS CRY$135,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
PACIFICA CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL$25,000
NASHVILLE ANTI-HUMAN TRAFFICKING CO$17,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%California Policy Center: $50k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 8 repeat orgs$477k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +128% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2026, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
7

Total granted

$2.1M
$225k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+128%
-1%

Still filing today

63%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $252k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationHealthHuman ServicesMembership BenefitInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OF
    OCCA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2025 · $550k · revenue +372%
  • PC
    PACIFICA CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL
    3× · 2020–2026 · $325k · revenue +128%
  • HH
    HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $40k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • UF
    UCI FoundationGavin Herbert Eye Institute
    one grant, 2021 · $65k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +95%
  • CP
    CALIFORNIA POLICY CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
2
Pacific Collegiate School

Pacific collegiate school's mission is to provide exemplary, standards based college preparatory and fine arts education for public middle and high school students of santa cruz county and bordering areas.

Education
3
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
4
Contra Costa College Foundation

To develop resources and relationships that provide financial support to contra costa college students through student scholarships, student programs and services, instructional supplies and facility improvements.

—
5
Children's Healthcare of California

The primary exempt purpose of children's healthcare of california includes without limitation the receipt of distributions and grants for the making of distributions and grants to children's hospital of orange county (choc) and to…

Health
6
Contra Costa Christian Schools Association

To provide christian education to students from preschool through high school

Education
7
California Charter Schools Association Advocates

To increase the involvement of the charter school community in the political process, create a pipeline of charter school supporters and activitists, endorse and support public officials who are committed to california charter public…

Education
8
Harvey Mudd College

HMC seeks to educate engineers, scientists, and mathematicians well versed in all of these areas and in the humanities, social sciences and the arts so that they may assume leadership in their fields with a clear understanding of the…

Education
9
Saint Mary's College of California

Saint mary's college of california invites you to passionately embrace knowledge, the challenges of scholarship, and the capacity to make lasting change in the world. the foundation for this is our mission. to probe deeply the mystery of…

Education
10
Pacifica Christian High School Orange County Inc

Teaching students to think and understand the world around them. equipping students to communicate effectively through the written and spoken word. stimulating heartfelt joy and interest in learning. encouraging students to live lives of…

Education
11
Occidental College

See schedule othe mission of occidental college is to provide a gifted and diverse group of students with a total educational experience of the highest quality - one that prepares them for leadership in an increasingly complex,…

Education
12
San Diego Christian College

San Diego Christian College exists to educate and inspire students through the truth of scripture and the development of competencies that prepare graduates whose purpose is to impact the world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of California Irvine Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHURCH OF THE CITY: $1,100,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE CITYIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUCI FoundationGavin Herbert Eye Institute: $65,000 · Other+5 more: $87,000 · Other+5 moreOCCA FOUNDATION: $550,000 · EducationOCCA FOUNDATIONPACIFICA CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $325,000 · EducationPACIFICA CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOLHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $65,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Education+1 more: $18,000 · EducationEXODUS CRY INC: $135,000 · InternationalHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $40,000 · HealthMERCY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $25,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA POLICY CENTER: $50,000 · Human ServicesCASA TERESA INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Membership Benefit
Other$1,352,000Education$1,008,000International$135,000Health$65,000Human Services$55,000Membership Benefit$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPACIFICA CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $325,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $65,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA POLICY CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHRISTIAN FAMILY MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC: $18,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetOrange Coast College Foundation: $18,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCASA TERESA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cbis Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cbis Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cbis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph