· Public charity
Catholic Charities Corporation
Respond to those in need through an integrated system of quality services designed to respect the dignity of every person and build a just and compassionate society.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $3,065,247 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,778,388 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,713,141 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $102k
- $250k+1 grant · $2.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DIOCESE OF CLEVELAND | $2,902,847 |
| WOMANKIND INC | $52,400 |
| ZELIE'S HOME | $50,000 |
| ASHLAND CARE CENTER INC | $20,000 |
| AKRON PREGNANCY SERVICES | $20,000 |
| HANNAH'S HOME | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against -11% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RTROSE-MARY THE JOHANNA GRASSELLI REHABILITATION&EDUCATION CENTER INC4× · 2020–2023 · $1.7M · revenue +3%
- SAST AUGUSTINE MANOR2× · 2017–2018 · $460k · revenue +42%
- ZHZELIE'S HOME2× · 2023–2024 · $90k · revenue +76%
Funded once
- RHROSE-MARY HOUSING CORPORATION FKA CATHOLIC CHARITIES HOUSING CORPone grant, 2017 · $551k · revenue -53% · 44% of their budget
- DODIOCESE OF CLEVELAND FACILITIES SERVICES CORPORATIONone grant, 2017 · $31k · revenue -11%
- BLBIRTHRIGHT LAKE INCone grant, 2023 · $21k · revenue -31%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Providing Biblical, life-affirming resources and services to those affected by unplanned pregnancy.
We are a Christ-centered residential care facility for pregnant women in crisis. We offer a safe home that provides shelter, food, prenatal/postpartum care, spiritual, mental, financial, rides to medical appointments, educational and…
Pregnancy Resource Services
To provide support for pregnant women
We are a religious-based 501c3 non-profit to provide community support for mothers and babies.
The mission of birthright st. charles is to assist women facing an untimely pregnancy in a caring and supportive environment. our guiding principle is, "it is the right of every pregnant woman to give birth, and the right of every child to…
To provide physical and emotional support to women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies through a christ centered and biblically based approach.
St. mary's home for mothers provides each mother to reside at the home for up to two years post-delivery while she acquires vocational/career training, parenting, homemaking skills as well as spiritual guidance to become fully ready to…
The pregnancy help center of san gabriel provides a safe caring environment where women who may be pregnant or who are pregnant can be supported with dignity during and after pregnancy.
The pregnancy care center empowers individuals to make life-affirming decisions through education, medical services, counseling, and compassionate care based on the ministry of jesus christ.
Pregnancy center dedicated to protecting the sanctity of human life.
Our mission is to provide spiritual, emotional, educational and material support to expectant mothers and fathers who are faced with an un-planned pregnancy so they may successfully carry their babies to term, based on catholic social and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rose-Mary the Johanna Grasselli Rehabilitation&Education Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hannahs Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SISTERS OF CHARITY OF ST AUGUSTINE HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds ROSE-MARY THE JOHANNA GRASSELLI REHABILITATION&EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ROSE-MARY HOUSING CORPORATION FKA CATHOLIC CHARITIES HOUSING CORP ↗
- Who funds ST AUGUSTINE MANOR ↗
- Who funds Womankind Inc ↗
- Who funds ZELIE'S HOME ↗
- Who funds DIOCESAN COUNCIL SOCIETY OF SVDP CLEVELAND DIOCESE ↗
- Who funds DIOCESE OF CLEVELAND FACILITIES SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds BIRTHRIGHT LAKE INC ↗
- Who funds BIRTHRIGHT GEAUGA INC ↗
- Who funds AKRON PREGNANCY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds ASHLAND CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Hannahs Home ↗
- Who funds WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Catholic Charities Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.