Skip to content
Catanzarite Family Foundation - IV at a glance

· Private foundation

Catanzarite Family Foundation - IV

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$34k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$145kEducation$92kPhilanthropy$17kArts & Culture$15kHuman Services$15kRecreation & Sports$9kCrime & Legal$5kReligion$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $4k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$285k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNION HOME FOUNDATION$15,000
WALSH JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL$15,000
STRONGSVILLE HIGH SCHOOL$3,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NOIA FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$185k · 5 repeat orgs$129k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +82% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
22

Total granted

$185k
$126k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+27%

Still filing today

80%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $64k · revenue +26%
  • SV
    SAINT VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $15k · revenue +82%
  • SG
    STEVEN G CANCER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $7k · revenue +126%

Funded once

  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $26k · revenue -82%
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -28%
  • NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
2
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
3
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
American Cancer Society Trust
—
6
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
7
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
8
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
9
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
10
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
11
National Tuberous Sclerosis Association

To improve quality of life for everyone affected by tuberous sclerosis complex by catalyzing new treatments, driving research toward a cure and expanding access to lifelong support.

Health
12
American Neuromuscular Foundation

The american neuromuscular foundation was established to improve the quality of care for people with disorders of skeletal muscle, neuromuscular function, and central and peripheral nervous systems through the promotion of research and…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Cancer Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Union Home Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WALSH JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $82,000 · OtherWALSH JESUIT HIGH SCHOOLSAINT VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY: $15,000 · OtherSAINT VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETYMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $10,000 · OtherMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherCRIME STOPPERS: $5,000 · Other+12 more: $32,400 · Other+12 moreAmerican Heart Association Inc: $63,590 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $26,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $25,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $10,000 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETYSTEVEN G CANCER FOUNDATION: $7,000 · Health+3 more: $3,000 · HealthTHE UNION HOME FOUNDATION INC: $17,000 · PhilanthropyNEAR WEST THEATRE INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureNOIA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesNOTRE DAME COLLEGE: $1,000 · Education
Other$149,400Health$134,590Philanthropy$17,000Arts & Culture$10,000Human Services$5,000Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $63,590 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $26,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION HOME FOUNDATION INC: $17,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSAINT VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY: $15,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetNEAR WEST THEATRE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetStrongsville Chamber of Commerce: $3,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetStrongsville Schools Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNOTRE DAME COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEARS TO YOU: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland Foundat…The Blackbaud Giving …Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Cleveland FoundationOH13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Catanzarite Family Foundation - IV funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Catanzarite Family Foundation - IV. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Catanzarite Family Foundation - IV’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home