Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Public charity

CareQuest Institute for Oral Health Inc

To improve the oral health of all.

$14M
Granted FY2022
106
Grants FY2022
39
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2022.

Health$29MCivil Rights$423kEmployment$291kHuman Services$275kHousing & Shelter$242kCommunity Improvement$235kPublic Safety & Disaster$125kCrime & Legal$116kOther$0
02FY2022 · 106 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k3 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $366k
  • $50k–250k78 grants · $10M
  • $250k+9 grants · $3.3M
$125,000
Median grant
39
States reached
$2.6B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL NETWORK OF PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTES$500,000
NATIONAL NETWORK OF PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTES$500,000
NATIONAL NETWORK OF PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTES$500,000
NATIONAL NETWORK OF PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTES$500,000
HISPANIC DENTAL ASSOCIATION$306,965
FAMILIES USA FOUNDATION INC$262,500
FAMILIES USA FOUNDATION INC$262,500
COMMUNITY CATALYSTINC$250,000
COMMUNITY CATALYSTINC$250,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY$204,522
Harvard School of Dental Medicine$200,000
Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board$200,000
CALIFORNIA PAN-ETHNIC HEALTH NETWORK$200,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$190,000
BOSTON UNIVERSITY$186,400
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $2.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PENNSYLVANIA COALITION FOR ORAL HEALTH: $48k → 10%The Arc of Philadelphia: $5k → 22%SEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES: $25k → 18%Neighborhood Services Organization Inc: $7k → 16%Families USA: $675k → 14%ORAL HEALTH KANSASINC: $156k → 14%Unete Center for Farm Worker Advocacy: $35k → 13%Community Health Center Inc: $150k → 7%SENIOR CHARITY CARE FOUNDATION: $15k → 6%Virginia Health Catalyst: $140k → 9%Magic Tooth Bus: $4k → 10%Families USA: $305k → 14%Oral Health Kansas Inc: $146k → 14%CHILDREN NOW: $150k → 10%Tides CenterLatino Coalition for a Healthy California: $2k → 12%Strategic Concepts in Organizing and Policy Education: $100k → 14%CESC Inc: $13k → 19%St Coletta's of Illinois: $3k → 14%STRATEGIC CONCEPTS IN ORGANIZING AND POLICY EDUCATION: $100k → 14%Coalition of Texans with disabilities: $110k → 10%Children Now: $105k → 10%COALITION OF TEXANS WITH DISABILITIES: $74k → 10%CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $125k → 9%Children Now: $100k → 10%The Children's Partnership: $50k → 14%Children's Alliance (WA): $98k → 9%BROOKVIEW HOUSE INC: $75k → 16%Brookview House Inc: $50k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
AR
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 38% of CareQuest Institute for Oral Health Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 19% of the giving stays in MA; read by stated purpose it is 10% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

CareQuest Institute for Oral Health Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 44% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$21M · 57 repeat orgs$8.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

57 repeat relationships — 55 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

57
64

Total granted

$21M
$4.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+21%

Still filing today

95%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NN
    NATIONAL NETWORK OF PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTES INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $5.4M · revenue +145%
  • FU
    FAMILIES USA FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $980k · revenue +62%
  • NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $500k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • MASSACHUSETTS LEAGUE OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $349k · revenue -12%
  • RM
    RIZE MASSACHUSETTS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $333k · revenue +12%
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CATALYST
    one grant, 2020 · $275k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Coalition On Health Care

The mission of the national coalition on health care (nchc) is to support research and analysis, develop and promote policy solutions, build consensus, and engage the public in order to ensure that america has a high quality health system…

Health
2
American College Health Association

The american college health association (acha) serves as the principal leadership organization for advancing the health of college students and campus communities through advocacy, education, and research.

Health
3
National Nurse-Led Care Consortium

The national nurse-led care consortium (nncc) strives to advance nurse-led healthcare through policy, consultation, and programs to reduce health disparities and meet people's primary care and wellness needs.

Health
4
Integrated Healthcare Association

Iha's mission is to bring the healthcare community together to solve industry-wide challenges that stand in the way of high-value care. as a non-profit industry association, we use objective data, our decades of expertise, and our unique…

—
5
American Public Health Association

To provide optimal, equitable health and well-being for all.

Health
6
Healthcare Access Maryland Inc

We are making maryland healthier by connecting residents to insurance and care, educating the community about healthier living, and advocating a more equitable health care system.

Health
7
Washington Association for Community Health

The mission of washington association for community health is to strengthen and advocate for washington's community health centers (chcs) as they build healthcare access, innovation, and value. the association provides training and…

—
8
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
9
National Health Council Inc

To provide a united voice for people with chronic diseases and disabilities.

—
10
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
11
Neighborhealth Corporation

Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…

Health
12
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Catalyst Inc and the most unlike its peers is Natives of One Wind Indigenous Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Policy Research and AdvocacyAffordable Housing Developm…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community College Foundatio…Independent K-12 SchoolsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Food Banks and PantriesChristian Missionary Organi…Senior Support ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportMilitary Veterans SupportDevelopmental Disabilities …Community FoundationsCommunity FoundationsUnited Way Affiliates
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%31%35–55yr16%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%41%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr16%11%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/165
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,400

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

155 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 155 of the 165 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

15
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
32
Early backer (in before they grew)
151/155
Grantees still filing
102/155
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL NETWORK OF PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTES INC — $5,409,687 · HealthNATIONAL NETWORK OF PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTES INCCOMMUNITY CATALYST INC — $998,548 · HealthCOMMUNITY CATALYST INCNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC — $500,000 · HealthHispanic Dental Association — $463,965 · Health+49 more — $6,357,755 · Health+49 moreFAMILIES USA ACTION — $525,000 · OtherFAMILIES USA ACTIONTampa Bay Healthcare Collaborative Inc — $399,300 · OtherHEALTH CARE FOR ALL INC — $373,607 · OtherCHILDRENS ACTION ALLIANCE INC — $350,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS LEAGUE OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC — $348,835 · OtherCENTER FOR MEDICARE ADVOCACY INC — $280,000 · OtherCOLORADO CONSUMER HEALTH INITIATIVE — $275,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CATALYST — $275,000 · OtherNC CHILD — $265,000 · OtherSolid Ground Washington — $353,935 · Other+46 more — $4,362,124 · Other+46 moreNew York University — $425,000 · EducationNew York Uni…President and Fellows of Harvard College — $419,080 · EducationPresident an…RIZE MASSACHUSETTS FOUNDATION INC — $333,333 · EducationRIZE MASSACH…UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC — $316,969 · EducationUNIVERSITY O…WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION — $307,840 · EducationWEST VIRGINI…Health Disparities Collaborative of Ohio — $287,665 · EducationHealth Dispa…Cross Street Training & Academic Center Inc — $229,747 · EducationCross Street…HAWAII CHILDREN'S ACTION NETWORK — $199,958 · EducationHAWAII CHILD…STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION — $185,000 · EducationSTATE UNIVER…AMDPA Foundation Inc — $170,200 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $151,081 · EducationWEST VIRGINIANS FOR AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE — $150,075 · EducationSociety of American Indian Dentist Inc — $144,600 · EducationUniversity of New Haven — $133,864 · Education+1 more — $10,000 · EducationFAMILIES USA FOUNDATION INC — $980,000 · Human ServicesFAMILIES U…CHILDREN NOW — $355,001 · Human ServicesCHILDREN N…COALITION OF TEXANS WITH DISABILITIES INC — $333,858 · Human ServicesCOALITION …ORAL HEALTH KANSAS INC — $302,585 · Human ServicesORAL HEALT…CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE — $222,713 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S…Strategic Concepts In Organizing & Policy Education — $200,000 · Human ServicesStrategic …VIRGINIA DENTAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION — $140,000 · Human ServicesBROOKVIEW HOUSE INC — $125,000 · Human Services+11 more — $206,942 · Human Services+11 moreMSDA CHARITABLE AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $310,451 · PhilanthropyBoston Foundation Inc — $200,000 · PhilanthropyADA Forsyth Institute Inc — $185,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC — $170,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF NEW YORK CITY — $145,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR PALM BEACH AND MARTIN COUNTIES INC — $145,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION — $145,000 · PhilanthropyARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $75,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF VIRGINIA'S BLUE RIDGE INC — $70,800 · Philanthropy+5 more — $107,823 · PhilanthropyKENTUCKY YOUTH ADVOCATES INC — $315,000 · Civil RightsHOOSIER ACTION RESOURCE CENTER INC — $217,282 · Civil RightsNative Americans in Philanthropy — $145,000 · Civil RightsSOUTH CAROLINA APPLESEED LEGAL JUSTICE CENTER — $135,520 · Civil RightsMISSISSIPPI COALITION ON BLACK CIVIC PARTICIPATION — $50,000 · Civil Rights+1 more — $25,000 · Civil RightsMaine Equal Justice Partners — $240,579 · Crime & LegalNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST — $120,000 · Crime & Legal
Health$13,729,955Other$7,807,801Education$3,464,412Human Services$2,866,099Philanthropy$1,554,074Civil Rights$887,802Crime & Legal$360,579

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTES INC — $5,409,687 over 3y, 21% of budgetCOMMUNITY CATALYST INC — $998,548 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetFAMILIES USA FOUNDATION INC — $980,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetFAMILIES USA ACTION — $525,000 over 1y, 85% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC — $500,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHispanic Dental Association — $463,965 over 2y, 39% of budgetNew York University — $425,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $419,080 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST PORTLAND AREA INDIAN HEALTH BOARD — $404,522 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHEALTH CARE FOR ALL INC — $373,607 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetMICHIGAN PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION — $356,777 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN NOW — $355,001 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetSolid Ground Washington — $353,935 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCalifornia Pan-Ethnic Health Network — $350,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetCHILDRENS ACTION ALLIANCE INC — $350,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS LEAGUE OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC — $348,835 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOALITION OF TEXANS WITH DISABILITIES INC — $333,858 over 2y, 16% of budgetRIZE MASSACHUSETTS FOUNDATION INC — $333,333 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC — $316,969 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKENTUCKY YOUTH ADVOCATES INC — $315,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetMSDA CHARITABLE AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $310,451 over 3y, 48% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION — $307,840 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetORAL HEALTH KANSAS INC — $302,585 over 2y, 34% of budgetALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION — $300,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN RESOURCES INC — $300,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS — $299,392 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetACHIEVA — $294,245 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetHealth Disparities Collaborative of Ohio — $287,665 over 2y, 46% of budgetCENTER FOR MEDICARE ADVOCACY INC — $280,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetCOLORADO CONSUMER HEALTH INITIATIVE — $275,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetMichigan Oral Health Coalition — $275,000 over 2y, 66% of budgetHAWAII PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE — $265,966 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetNC CHILD — $265,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetConnecticut Oral Health Initiative Inc — $265,000 over 2y, 41% of budgetNATIONAL RURAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION — $250,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $249,939 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMaine Equal Justice Partners — $240,579 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION — $235,487 over 2y, 25% of budgetSUWANNEE RIVER AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC — $233,068 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetTEXAS HEALTH INSTITUTE — $229,381 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetIllinois Primary Health Care Association — $225,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S ALLIANCE — $222,713 over 2y, 11% of budgetHOOSIER ACTION RESOURCE CENTER INC — $217,282 over 2y, 16% of budgetTHE ARCHER GROUP — $210,100 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetJUSTICE IN AGING — $210,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetDELTA DENTAL OF WASHINGTON — $208,263 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAINE PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION — $202,895 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetStrategic Concepts In Organizing & Policy Education — $200,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Carequest Foundation …Community Catalyst IncDelta Dental Communit…The Robert Wood Johns…New Venture FundHopewell FundAnnie E Casey Foundat…The Commonwealth FundMAZON A Jewish Respon…Patterson FoundationCommunity Catalyst Ac…California Healthcare…
Carequest Foundation IncMA141.8× affinity68 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Carequest Foundation Inc · Community Catalyst Inc · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · New Venture Fund · Hopewell Fund · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · The Commonwealth Fund · MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger · Patterson Foundation · Community Catalyst Action Fund Inc · California Healthcare Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization CareQuest Institute for Oral Health Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Southern Plains Tribal Health Board Foundation — 83% of income from government
  • Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board — 70% of income from government
  • Center for Medicare Advocacy Inc — 63% of income from government
  • Rize Massachusetts Foundation Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Ada Forsyth Institute Inc — 38% of income from government
  • Brookview House Inc — 34% of income from government
  • Zufall Health Center Inc — 32% of income from government
  • Health Care for All Inc — 29% of income from government
  • Cross Street Training & Academic Center Inc — 26% of income from government
  • Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Community Catalyst Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • National Association of Community Health Centers Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Edward M Kennedy Community Health Center Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Connecticut Oral Health Initiative Inc — 9% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Center for Health Care Strategies Inc — 7% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc — 3% of income from government
  • University of New Haven — 2% of income from government
  • American Childrens Campaign Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
29report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 165 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines