Skip to content

· Private foundation

Casten Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$213k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$153k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.3MInternational$460kArts & Culture$326kEnvironment$129kHuman Services$47kFood & Nutrition$46kHousing & Shelter$35kScience & Tech$16kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $51k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $153k
$6,737
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEAP SCIENCE AND MATHS SCHOOL$153,212
FULBRIGHT COMMISSION$38,498
Individual grant recipient$12,612
HINSDALE HIGH SCHOOL LEAP CLUB$6,737
MORTON ARBORETUM$880
SCLERODERMA FOUNDATION OF GREATER CHICAGO$740
WTTW$400
WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 54% of grant dollars ($1.3M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 46% that went abroad ($1.1M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $500 → 11%FAMILY SHELTER SERVICE: $11k → 7%ORGANIZATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF AFGHAN WOMEN: $2k → 17%THE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $20k → 7%THE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $3k → 7%THE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $1k → 7%THE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $1k → 7%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
IA
NJ
CA
CO
KS
TN
DC

Beyond the US: 46% of all-years giving ($1.1M)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
South Africa$859k · 9 grants
Italy$241k · 4 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 34 repeat orgs$265k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
50

Total granted

$2.1M
$226k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+15%

Still filing today

50%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OA
    ONE ACRE FUND
    7× · 2017–2023 · $407k · revenue +258%
  • CP
    CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $207k · revenue +38%
  • HS
    HACKLEY SCHOOL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $80k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • IS
    ITALY SLOW FOODS FULBRIGHT PROGRAM
    one grant, 2017 · $54k
  • UD
    UNIVERSITA DI SCIENZE GASTONOMI
    one grant, 2018 · $39k
  • TL
    The Land Institutegraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +105%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
2
Climate Foundation

To research and develop healthy climate solutions comprising global food security, ecosystem regeneration and carbon balance in seas and soils.

Science & Tech
3
Chicago Sun-Times Media Inc

Chicago sun-times serves the public interest by strengthening the well-being of our local communities and our democracy through independent local journalism.

—
4
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
5
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
6
Greater Chicago Food Depository

The greater chicago food depository is the nonprofit food bank serving cook county. our mission - is to end hunger. we believe food is a basic human right. to achieve our mission, we work in partnership with a network of community-based…

Food & Nutrition
7
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
8
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
9
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
10
Ceres Inc

Ceres is a nonprofit advocacy organization working to accelerate the transition to a cleaner, more just, and resilient world. through education and research, we make the business case for action on the most pressing sustainability…

Environment
11
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
12
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Toniic Institute; the most unlike its peers is Organization for the Advancement of Afghan Women. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/47
Grantees still filing
33/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEAP SCIENCE AND MATHS SCHOOL: $850,649 · OtherLEAP SCIENCE AND MATHS SCHOOLUS ITALY FULBRIGHT COMMISSION: $202,212 · OtherUS ITALY FULBRIGHT COMMISSIONWBEZ: $100,000 · OtherWBEZINTERNATIONAL BIOCHAR INSTITUTE: $77,034 · OtherITALY SLOW FOODS FULBRIGHT PROGRAM: $53,633 · Other+61 more: $265,564 · Other+61 moreONE ACRE FUND: $406,809 · InternationalONE ACRE FUNDTHE CHICAGO COUNCIL ON GLOBAL AFFAIRS: $20,480 · InternationalCERGE-EI FOUNDATION: $20,000 · InternationalCHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $207,200 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO PU…+4 more: $5,448 · Arts & CultureHACKLEY SCHOOL: $80,000 · Health+3 more: $706 · HealthMetropolitan Family Services: $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $24,500 · Human ServicesFamily Shelter Service Inc: $11,050 · Human Services+2 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesCLIMATE INSTITUTE: $20,120 · EnvironmentTHE MORTON ARBORETUM: $2,650 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Environment+1 more: $780 · EnvironmentHCS FAMILY SERVICES: $6,250 · Community Improvement
Other$1,549,092International$447,289Arts & Culture$212,648Health$80,706Human Services$63,050Environment$26,050Community Improvement$6,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetONE ACRE FUND: $406,809 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $207,200 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHACKLEY SCHOOL: $80,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Land Institute: $25,080 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMetropolitan Family Services: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $24,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetTHE CHICAGO COUNCIL ON GLOBAL AFFAIRS: $20,480 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCLIMATE INSTITUTE: $20,120 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetCERGE-EI FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFamily Shelter Service Inc: $11,050 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPLEASANT HOME FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CHICAGOLAND WEST: $8,023 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetHCS FAMILY SERVICES: $6,250 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BOULEVARD OF CHICAGO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MORTON ARBORETUM: $2,650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR INQUIRY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVermont Public Radio: $1,850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGROWING HOME INC: $1,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGROVE EXPRESS FOUNDATION: $1,083 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $948 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY FOR SCIENCE & THE PUBLIC: $930 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGrist Magazine Inc: $780 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSCLERODERMA FOUNDATION OF GREATER CHICAGO: $740 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRole Model Movement Inc (NFP): $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF MANKATO INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWellness House: $430 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTONIIC INSTITUTE: $309 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE MILLION DEGREES: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAD RIVER PATH ASSOCIATION: $250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSEED SAVERS EXCHANGE INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $166 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL SCLERODERMA FOUNDATION INC: $110 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $108 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAISY DASH: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ONE ACRE FUND ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds HACKLEY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds The Land Institute ↗
  • Who funds Metropolitan Family Services ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO COUNCIL ON GLOBAL AFFAIRS ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CERGE-EI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Family Shelter Service Inc ↗
  • Who funds GlobeMed NFP ↗
  • Who funds PLEASANT HOME FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CHICAGOLAND WEST ↗
  • Who funds HCS FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THE BOULEVARD OF CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MORTON ARBORETUM ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR INQUIRY INC ↗
  • Who funds ORGANIZATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF AFGHAN WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds Vermont Public Radio ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dupage Community FoundationIL15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dupage Community Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Ge Aerospace Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Verizon Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Casten Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Casten Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Mad River Path Association: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 88 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Casten Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph