Skip to content

· Private foundation

Casler Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$57k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$93kHealth$55kHousing & Shelter$38kEducation$32kFood & Nutrition$26kArts & Culture$22kInternational$19kPublic Safety & Disaster$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$866k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CRUSADERS COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION$5,000
PEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE$5,000
ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY$4,500
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$3,000
SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND$3,000
CYPRUS AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE$3,000
MILLIGAN COLLEGE$3,000
AMERICAN SCHOOL OF CLASSICAL STUDIES AT ATHENS$3,000
CARPENTERS PLACE$3,000
LIFE NETWORK OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS$2,000
INT'L DISASTER EMERGENCY SERVICE INC$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
LEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $10k → 22%GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $7k → 22%GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $6k → 22%GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $6k → 22%GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $6k → 22%GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $5k → 22%ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $5k → 15%ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $3k → 15%ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $3k → 15%ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $3k → 15%ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $3k → 15%ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $3k → 15%CARPENTERS PLACE: $3k → 15%CARPENTERS PLACE: $3k → 15%CARPENTERS PLACE: $2k → 15%CARPENTERS PLACE: $2k → 15%CARPENTERS PLACE: $2k → 15%CARPENTERS PLACE: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
NJ
VA
AZ
TN
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$292k · 27 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
8

Total granted

$292k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+22%

Still filing today

48%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationReligionArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $40k · revenue +30%
  • RR
    ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $20k · revenue +2%
  • PS
    PEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $19k · revenue +321%

Funded once

  • CO
    CARITAS OF AUSTIN
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +7%
  • PL
    POLO LIBRARY FOUNDATION NFPNgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +64%
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue -25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

—
2
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
3
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
4
Christian Care Surprise Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
5
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
6
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
7
Lutheran Social Services Housing Inc

Lss housing will support the continued vitality of north dakota communities by providing housing and housing-related services.

—
8
First Homes Properties

To provide opportunities for low and moderate-income households in southeastern minnesota counties to secure housing that is decent and affordable.

Housing & Shelter
9
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
10
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
11
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
12
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rockford Rescue Mission Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Life Network of Southern Illinois. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $32,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCRUSADERS COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $31,000 · OtherCRUSADERS COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATIONAMERICAN SCHOOL OF CLASSICAL STUDIES AT ATHENS: $15,500 · OtherAMERICAN SCHOOL OF CLASSICAL STUDIES AT ATHENSINT'L DISASTER EMERGENCY SERVICE INC: $12,000 · OtherINT'L DISASTER EMERGENCY SERVICE INCSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $11,000 · OtherSAMARITAN'S PURSEIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherLIFE NETWORK OF SOUTHERN IL: $7,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $6,000 · Other+12 more: $25,308 · Other+12 moreGOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $40,000 · Human ServicesGOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIESROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $19,500 · Human ServicesROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRYCARPENTER'S PLACE INC: $14,000 · Human ServicesCARPENTER'S PLACE INCLEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $12,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $8,000 · HealthLife Network of Southern Illinois: $2,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,000 · HealthPEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE INC: $19,000 · Housing & ShelterROCKFORD AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterCYPRUS AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $15,500 · Arts & CultureROCKFORD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureMILLIGAN UNIVERSITY: $12,000 · EducationPOLO LIBRARY FOUNDATION NFPN: $2,000 · EducationROCKFORD RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES: $2,000 · EducationPioneer Bible Translators: $7,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,000 · ReligionMISSIONS OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 · Religion
Other$146,808Human Services$73,500Health$24,000Housing & Shelter$20,000Arts & Culture$17,500Education$16,000Religion$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $40,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $19,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE INC: $19,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCYPRUS AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $15,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCARPENTER'S PLACE INC: $14,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMILLIGAN UNIVERSITY: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPioneer Bible Translators: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPOLO HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,250 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetCARITAS OF AUSTIN: $2,058 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOLO LIBRARY FOUNDATION NFPN: $2,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetLife Network of Southern Illinois: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKFORD RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRETHREN HOME: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKFORD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROCKFORD AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds CYPRUS AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CARPENTER'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds MILLIGAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Pioneer Bible Translators ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds POLO HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CARITAS OF AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds POLO LIBRARY FOUNDATION NFPN ↗
  • Who funds Life Network of Southern Illinois ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds ROCKFORD RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds BRETHREN HOME ↗
  • Who funds ROCKFORD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSIONS OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds ROCKFORD AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Northern ILIL15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern IL · Edward Jones Foundation · Gloyd Family Foundation · Sjostrom & Sons Foundation · Bergstrom Inc Charitable Foundation Xxxxx2008 · The Kjellstrom Family Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Casler Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Casler Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Casler’s filings →

    More from the funding graph