Skip to content
Casey's Clubhouse Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Casey's Clubhouse Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$68k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Youth Development$69kHealth$53kReligion$37kRecreation & Sports$34kEducation$28kInternational$28kEnvironment$9kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
$2,500
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PITTSBURGH KIDS FOUNDATION$12,000
CHOICES FOR RECOVERY INC$10,000
412 THRIVE$8,000
UPPER ST CLAIR BASEBALL$6,500
LEAVING LEGACIES FOUNDATION$5,000
LAWRENCE CATHOLIC ACADEMY$5,000
ESPERANZA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION$5,000
DIAMOND IMPACT LLC$2,500
TEDS FOUNDATION INC$2,500
WATER MISSION$2,500
K IMPACT FOUNDATION$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
PWSA$1,000
DEMPSTER FAMILY FOUNDATION$1,000
LINGZI FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LAWRENCE CATHOLIC ACADEMY: $10k → 10%LINGZI FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%JOSH GIBSON FOUNDATION: $7k → 11%LEAVING LEGACIES FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%K IMPACT FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%ESPERANZA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%PWSA: $5k → 9%CLINT HURDLE HOTSTOVE FUNDRAISER: $5k → 10%CHOICES FOR RECOVERY INC: $10k → 11%NG3 ORGANIZATION: $5k → 9%KENT STATE BASEBALL: $5k → 12%DIAMOND IMPACT LLC: $3k → 15%DEMPSTER FAMILY FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%HENRICO EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%TEDS FOUNDATION INC: $34k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $5k → 22%LAWRENCE CATHOLIC ACADEMY: $5k → 10%LINGZI FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%UPPER ST CLAIR BASEBALL: $7k → 11%K IMPACT FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%ESPERANZA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%PWSA: $3k → 9%CHOICES FOR RECOVERY INC: $10k → 11%NG3 ORGANIZATION: $4k → 9%DEMPSTER FAMILY FOUNDATION: $1k → 7%TEDS FOUNDATION INC: $15k → 13%UPPER ST CLAIR BASEBALL: $4k → 11%K IMPACT FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%PWSA: $1k → 9%CHOICES FOR RECOVERY INC: $5k → 11%NG3 ORGANIZATION: $2k → 9%TEDS FOUNDATION INC: $9k → 13%UPPER ST CLAIR FOOTBALL: $4k → 11%CHOICES FOR RECOVERY INC: $5k → 11%NG3 ORGANIZATION: $1k → 9%TEDS FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 13%UPPER ST CLAIR FOOTBALL: $3k → 11%SOUTH HILLS YOUNG LIFE: $3k → 11%THE EDUCATIONAL PARTNERSHIP: $2k → 11%THE EDUCATIONAL PARTNERSHIP: $2k → 11%EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $1k → 11%THE EDUCATIONAL PARTNERSHIP: $1k → 11%PITTSBURGH KIDS FOUNDATION: $12k → 11%PITTSBURGH KIDS FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%PITTSBURGH KIDS FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%412 THRIVE: $8k → 11%PITTSBURGH KIDS FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
VA
NC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$220k · 14 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue -12% since the first grant, against -18% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
9

Total granted

$220k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-12%
-18%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyEducationYouth DevelopmentReligionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PK
    PITTSBURGH KIDS FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $34k · revenue +20%
  • CF
    CHOICES FOR RECOVERY INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $30k · revenue +98% · 95% of their budget
  • WM
    WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $5k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • JG
    JOSH GIBSON FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue +146%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -18%
  • CH
    CLINT HURDLE HOTSTOVE FUNDRAISER
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
C3 Legacy Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Living Legacy Foundation
Philanthropy
3
The Challenge Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Living Hope Foundation
Religion
5
Never Give Up Foundation
Health
6
Leader Foundation
—
7
DREAMS33 Foundation
Human Services
8
Team Griffin Foundation
Recreation & Sports
9
Legacy Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Legacy Foundation
—
11
The Lef Foundation
—
12
The Reach Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Water Missions International; the most unlike its peers is Leaving Legacies Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
4/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ESPERANZA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $17,500 · OtherESPERANZA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATIONLAWRENCE CATHOLIC ACADEMY OF LAWRENCE MASSACHUSETTS INC: $14,500 · OtherLAWRENCE CATHOLIC ACADEMY OF LAWRENCE MASSACHU…K IMPACT FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 · OtherK IMPACT FOUNDATION INCNG3 Organization Inc: $12,000 · OtherNG3 Organization IncUPPER ST CLAIR BASEBALL: $10,500 · OtherUPPER ST CLAIR BASEBALLPWSA: $8,500 · OtherPWSAUPPER ST CLAIR FOOTBALL: $6,000 · OtherCLINT HURDLE HOTSTOVE FUNDRAISER: $5,000 · OtherWATER MISSION INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,500 · Other+5 more: $11,900 · Other+5 moreTEDS FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentTEDS FOUNDATION INCCHOICES FOR RECOVERY INC: $30,000 · HealthCHOICES FOR REC…412 THRIVE: $8,000 · Health412 THRIVEPITTSBURGH KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $34,205 · ReligionPITTSBURGH KID…UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $5,000 · EducationHENRICO EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationLEAVING LEGACIES FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyLINGZI FOUNDATION: $2,125 · PhilanthropyJOSH GIBSON FOUNDATION: $6,500 · Recreation & SportsWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 · International
Other$112,900Youth Development$60,000Health$38,000Religion$34,205Education$10,000Philanthropy$7,125Recreation & Sports$6,500International$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEDS FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetPITTSBURGH KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $34,205 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCHOICES FOR RECOVERY INC: $30,000 over 4y, 95% of budgetESPERANZA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $17,500 over 4y, 19% of budgetNG3 Organization Inc: $12,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budget412 THRIVE: $8,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetJOSH GIBSON FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetLEAVING LEGACIES FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHENRICO EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLINGZI FOUNDATION: $2,125 over 2y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH KIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHOICES FOR RECOVERY INC ↗
  • Who funds ESPERANZA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NG3 Organization Inc ↗
  • Who funds 412 THRIVE ↗
  • Who funds JOSH GIBSON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LEAVING LEGACIES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND ↗
  • Who funds HENRICO EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds LINGZI FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Casey Family Foundati…Network for GoodNatl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Casey Family Foundation IncPA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Casey Family Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Casey's Clubhouse Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Casey's Clubhouse Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Casey's Clubhouse’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home