Skip to content

· Private foundation

Carson Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$33k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$59kHuman Services$53kArts & Culture$19kFood & Nutrition$17kReligion$12kPhilanthropy$11kEmployment$6kHousing & Shelter$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$283k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$5,000
THE SPRING$5,000
MARTHAS FOUNDATION$4,000
ST JUDE$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE$2,000
SMILE TRAIN$2,000
SAPULPA CHAMBER FOUNDATION$2,000
SOUTHERN HILLS BAPTIST CHURCH$2,000
JOHN 316$2,000
CARA$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,000
CHARITY BALL INC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DAYSPRING VILLA: $4k → 15%DAYSPRING VILLA: $4k → 15%DAYSPRING VILLA: $3k → 15%DAYSPRING VILLA: $2k → 15%DRESS FOR SUCCESS: $2k → 15%DRESS FOR SUCCESS: $1k → 15%DRESS FOR SUCCESS: $1k → 15%DRESS FOR SUCCESS: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$196k · 19 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
11

Total granted

$196k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+116%

Still filing today

58%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthReligionPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $16k · revenue +19%
  • LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $14k · revenue +69%
  • TS
    THE SPRING SHELTER INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $13k · revenue +395%

Funded once

  • CC
    CREEK COUNTY CITIZENS ADVISORY BOAR
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • JM
    JAMES MISSION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Parent Child Ctr of Tulsa Inc

To prevent child abuse and neglect through education, treatment, and advocacy. the parent child center of tulsa (pcct) has been serving the tulsa community and surrounding areas since 1990. in 2024, pcct served more than 96,000 infants,…

—
2
Good Samaritan Health Services Inc

Good samaritan health services,inc provide quality health care to the underserved populations within the community.the organization integrate support from the community and emphasize a holistic approach to healthcare.

Health
3
Family Safety Center Inc

The family safety center exists to promote safety and justice in tulsa county through co-located multi-disciplinary services that offer protection, hope and healing to victims of intimate partner and family violence, sexual assault,…

Crime & Legal
4
City Rescue Mission Inc

Our mission is to lead our community by serving people experiencing or at risk of homelessness with help, hope, and healing, in the spirit of excellence, under the call of christ.

Human Services
5
City Help Inc of Phoenix

Our mission is to reach in and mine the incredible potential we believe lies within the lives of at-risk youth, the homeless, and needy families of our community by restoring hope and allowing them to dream again.

Human Services
6
The Shade Tree Inc

The shade tree, inc. (organization), a nevada nonprofit corporation, provides temporary shelter for homeless and abused women and children in crisis and offers life-changing services promoting stability, dignity, and self reliance. the…

—
7
Livefree Okc Inc

Dramatically reduce gun violence in impacted Oklahoma communities through intervention and effective provision of resources.

Human Services
8
Safe Nesttemporary Assistance for

Safe nest's mission is to provide comprehensive, collaborative, and innovative services for everyone affected by domestic and sexual violence while passionatley working to end this shared epidemic.

Human Services
9
Sunflower House Inc

To protect children in our community from physical and sexual abuse through education, advocacy, forensic , medical and mental health services.

Crime & Legal
10
Crisis Center of West Texas

Crisis center of west texas' mission is to respond, shelter, and educate to end domestic and sexual violence in west texas.

—
11
The St Anthony Hospital Foundation Inc

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
12
Sass Go

Sass go is on a mission to eradicate assault, abuse, and trafficking against women and girls globally through prevention education, self defense training, and case consulting. our dedicated team believes all women deserve to learn the…

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Spring Shelter Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sapulpa Area Chamber Foundatio. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $24,000 · OtherALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATIONIndividual grant recipient: $21,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE SPRING: $19,000 · OtherTHE SPRINGSMILE TRAIN INC: $16,000 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INCLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $14,000 · OtherLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INCST JUDE: $13,000 · OtherST JUDESALVATION ARMY: $9,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYJOHN 316: $8,000 · OtherSAPULPA CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $6,500 · OtherUNITED WAY: $6,500 · Other+12 more: $15,600 · Other+12 moreTHE SPRING SHELTER INC: $13,000 · Human ServicesTHE SPRING SHELTER…JOHN 316 MISSION: $8,000 · Human ServicesJOHN 316 MISSIONMartha's Foundation: $7,000 · Human ServicesMartha's Foundatio…Dress for Success Oklahoma City Inc: $6,000 · Human ServicesDress for Success …IRON GATE INC: $12,000 · ReligionST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,000 · HealthJoy in the Cause Company: $3,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 · HealthCHARITY BALL INC: $4,000 · PhilanthropySAPULPA PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $1,250 · Education
Other$152,600Human Services$34,000Religion$12,000Health$8,500Philanthropy$4,000Education$1,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $14,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SPRING SHELTER INC: $13,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetIRON GATE INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMartha's Foundation: $7,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetDress for Success Oklahoma City Inc: $6,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITY BALL INC: $4,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetJoy in the Cause Company: $3,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSAPULPA PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAPULPA AREA CHAMBER FOUNDATIO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOKLAHOMA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SPRING SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds IRON GATE INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN 316 MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Martha's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Dress for Success Oklahoma City Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARITY BALL INC ↗
  • Who funds Joy in the Cause Company ↗
  • Who funds JAMES MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAPULPA PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAPULPA AREA CHAMBER FOUNDATIO ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK14.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    7get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph