· Private foundation
Carrie L Winter Trust Under Will
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k30 grants · $113k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $37k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE MASTER'S HANDS INC | $16,000 |
| SCOUTS BSA TROOP 211B | $11,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| THE O2 YOUTH CENTER | $8,500 |
| PROJECT COMMUNITY | $8,150 |
| BLAZE ORANGE YOUTH SPORTING CLUB | $7,000 |
| OLNEY ARTS COUNSIL | $6,500 |
| OLNEY PUBLIC LIBRARY | $6,000 |
| RICHLAND COUNTY 4-H FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
| MENTOR RICHLAND COUNTY | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| CUB SCOUT PACK 211 | $5,000 |
| CARLE HEALTH CNTR FOR PHILANTHROPY | $4,566 |
| RICHLAND COUNTY MIDDLE SCHOOL | $4,050 |
| RICHLAND COUNTY CEO PROGRAM | $4,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +8% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.
40 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- RCRICHLAND COUNTY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL P4× · 2020–2023 · $33k · revenue +6% · 93% of their budget
- MRMENTOR RICHLAND COUNTY6× · 2020–2025 · $19k · revenue +39%
- GSGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS6× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $15k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rescue abandoned, stray, or surrended animals.
4-h empowers youth to reach their full potential by working and learning in partnerships with adults to gain knowledge and life skills through "learn by doing" activities in a safe environment.
School activities and fundraisers
County fair grounds for the benefit of the youth of Richland County. with the county fair being the significant activity.
Encourage local youth & increase their knowledge of agricultural fields
Provide food for those in need
To support richland county public library
The Richland Elementary Schools Parent Teacher Organization PTO promotes the well-being and enrichment of our students through activities that stimulate the physical emotional and cultural growth of our children. The PTOs projects benefit…
Provide summer 4h opportunities for yth
To guide and assist our youth in their pursuit of personal growth through athletic excellence and the meaning of sportsmanship
How this is measured
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Johnsie Fiock Fildes Foundation Ltd · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Carrie L Winter Trust Under Will funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carrie L Winter Trust Under Will. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Carrie L Winter Trust Under Will’s filings →