Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Johnsie Fiock Fildes Foundation Ltd

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$335k
Granted FY2024still arriving
71
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$669kRecreation & Sports$186kEnvironment$135kCommunity Improvement$105kPublic Safety & Disaster$85kArts & Culture$80kReligion$76kCrime & Legal$71kOther$0
02FY2024 · 71 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k61 grants · $144k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $191k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Johnsie Fiock Filed Nature Foundation$40,000
The Unity Project Missions$25,500
Olney Central College$25,000
Richland County Sheriff's Dept$20,000
Olney Central College$18,000
RCCUSD#1$14,911
St Joseph School$13,825
St Joseph School$13,130
The Blaze Orange Shooting team$10,819
Southeastern Illinois Yorth Golf Foundation$10,000
Shop with a Hometown Hero$8,000
Individual grant recipient$7,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
Beautiful Lives Project$5,000
Olney Basketball League Inc$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%Good Samaritan of Richland County: $5k → 15%Good Samaritan of Richland County: $3k → 15%Good Samaritan of Richland County: $3k → 15%Good Samaritan of Richland County: $3k → 15%Good Samaritan of Richland County-Adopt: $3k → 15%Good Samaritan of Richland County: $960 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of The Johnsie Fiock Fildes Foundation Ltd’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in IL; read by stated purpose it is 91% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Johnsie Fiock Fildes Foundation Ltdlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 58 repeat orgs$652k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of 0% since the first grant, against -24% for the ones you funded once.

58 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

58
67

Total granted

$1.0M
$573k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-24%

Still filing today

7%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $79k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementPhilanthropyEnvironmentHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TJ
    The Johnsie Fiock Fildes Nature Foundation Ltd
    2× · 2020–2024 · $135k · revenue -87% · 84% of their budget
  • OC
    Olney Central College
    4× · 2020–2024 · $121k
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH SCHOOL
    5× · 2020–2024 · $86k

Funded once

  • RC
    Richland County Community School
    one grant, 2021 · $102k
  • PC
    Project Community Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -79%
  • RC
    Richland County CUSD#1
    one grant, 2020 · $85k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Richland Youth Foundation
2
Richland Community Food Pantry Inc

Provide food for those in need

Community Improvement
3
Richland County Food Bank Inc

To feed the hungry in the community

Human Services
4
Grants-Milan Rotary Foundation Inc

Fund various local civil projects

Community Improvement
5
Hickory County Cares

Food distribution to the needy

Human Services
6
Buffalo Grove Community Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Richfield Community Center
8
Fullerville Mission Ltd

Help people

Religion
9
Transform Rockford
Community Improvement
10
Northern Il Helping Hands Food Pantry Nfp

To provide at least 2 days of food to needy families and people.

Food & Nutrition
11
Roscommon County Food Pantry Project Hope of Roscommon Count

Collect money to purchase food to dictributed to needy families in roscommon county michigan

Food & Nutrition
12
Olmsted City of Greater Utica Inc

Beautify Proctor Park in Utica NY

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olney Firefighters Association and the most unlike its peers is The Johnsie Fiock Fildes Nature Foundation Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 152 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
2/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Olney Central College — $121,305 · OtherOlney Central CollegeRichland County Community School — $102,000 · OtherRichland County Community SchoolST JOSEPH SCHOOL — $86,340 · OtherST JOSEPH SCHOOLRichland County CUSD#1 — $85,000 · OtherRichland County CUSD#1Richland County Community Unit #1 — $67,636 · OtherRichland County Community Unit #1Richland County Sheriff's Dept — $67,000 · OtherRichland County Sheriff's Dept+137 more — $698,921 · Other+137 moreThe Johnsie Fiock Fildes Nature Foundation Ltd — $135,000 · EnvironmentThe Johns…Project Community Inc — $100,000 · Community ImprovementRICHLAND COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $5,000 · Community ImprovementThe Unity Project Missions — $73,150 · PhilanthropyBEAUTIFUL LIVES PROJECT INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyOLNEY FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION — $53,965 · Public Safety & DisasterWhite Squirrel Pickleball Association — $30,000 · Recreation & SportsGIVING HOPE OLNEY FOOD PANTRY NFP — $20,900 · Food & NutritionGOOD SAMARITAN OF RICHLAND COUNTY — $17,960 · Human Services
Other$1,228,202Environment$135,000Community Improvement$105,000Philanthropy$83,150Public Safety & Disaster$53,965Recreation & Sports$30,000Food & Nutrition$20,900Human Services$17,960

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Johnsie Fiock Fildes Nature Foundation Ltd — $135,000 over 2y, 84% of budgetThe Unity Project Missions — $73,150 over 3y, 74% of budgetOLNEY FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION — $53,965 over 2y, 55% of budgetWhite Squirrel Pickleball Association — $30,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetMENTOR RICHLAND COUNTY — $23,000 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetGIVING HOPE OLNEY FOOD PANTRY NFP — $20,900 over 1y, 30% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN OF RICHLAND COUNTY — $17,960 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetBEAUTIFUL LIVES PROJECT INC — $10,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetBUFFALO TRACE COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #156 — $7,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetRICHLAND COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Johnsie Fiock Fildes Nature Foundation Ltd
  • Who funds Project Community Inc
  • Who funds The Unity Project Missions
  • Who funds OLNEY FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds White Squirrel Pickleball Association
  • Who funds MENTOR RICHLAND COUNTY
  • Who funds GIVING HOPE OLNEY FOOD PANTRY NFP
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN OF RICHLAND COUNTY
  • Who funds BEAUTIFUL LIVES PROJECT INC
  • Who funds BUFFALO TRACE COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #156

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Carrie L Winter Trust Under WillIL17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Carrie L Winter Trust Under Will · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Johnsie Fiock Fildes Foundation Ltd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Johnsie Fiock Fildes Foundation Ltd?

    Find your warmest path to The Johnsie Fiock Fildes Foundation Ltd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 152 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph