Skip to content

· Private foundation

Carolyn M & Leary E Peterson Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0175% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$115kHealth$58kReligion$40kHuman Services$21kInternational$20kHousing & Shelter$20kArts & Culture$10kCivil Rights$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,199
Median grant
6
States reached
$360k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AGRACE FOUNDATION$5,549
COVENANT CHURCH OF NAPLES$5,549
STUDENTS FOR LIFE OF AMERICA$5,274
SOUTHWEST OPTIONS FOR WOMEN$5,274
ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
WISCONSIN WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION$3,850
Individual grant recipient$3,199
RIVERS AND BLUFFS ANIMAL SHELTER$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
FIREWEED COMMUNITY WOODSHOP$2,000
HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT$2,000
ST MARY'S ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$2,000
ANNA MARIE'S SHELTER$1,549
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LIFE RELAUNCH: $3k → 11%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $3k → 10%SOUTHWEST OPTIONS FOR WOMEN: $11k → 11%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $2k → 10%SOUTHWEST OPTIONS FOR WOMEN: $5k → 11%SOUTHWEST OPTIONS FOR WOMEN: $5k → 11%MIDDLETON OUTREACH MINISTRY INC: $1k → 10%ROADS TO LIFE TANZANIA INC: $2k → 11%ROADS TO LIFE TANZANIA INC: $2k → 11%ROADS TO LIFE TANZANIA INC: $2k → 11%ROADS TO LIFE TANZANIA INC: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
IL
WI
IA
OH
PA
KY
VA
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$265k · 21 repeat orgs$109k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
29

Total granted

$265k
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+38%

Still filing today

33%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalEducationFood & NutritionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $21k · revenue +93%
  • SO
    SOUTHWEST OPTIONS FOR WOMEN
    3× · 2023–2025 · $21k · revenue +2%
  • AO
    ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $10k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • HF
    HOLY FAMILY PARISH
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
  • PC
    PRAIRIE CATHOLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • JI
    J-WALKERS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
2
Senior Life Resources Northwest

To preserve and enhance the quality of life at home, with dignity and care.

Human Services
3
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
4
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

—
5
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
6
Connections for Life

Empowering people with disabilities by providing services that promote independence, equality and intergration, enhancing their quality of life.

Health
7
Lifewater Inc

Lifewater international is a non-profit christian water development organization dedicated to effectively serving vulnerable children and families by partnering with underserved communities to overcome water poverty.

Environment
8
Horizon Home Care & Hospice Inc

Horizon home care & hospice, inc. is a full-service provider offering a wide range of specialty services to meet the needs of patients in southeastern wisconsin. as an extension of a network of acute-care hospitals and other health care…

Health
9
Wisconsin Collaborative for Healthcare Quality Inc

Wisconsin collaborative for healthcare quality, inc. publicly reports and brings meaning to performance measurement information that improves the quality and affordability of healthcare in wisconsin, in turn improving the health of…

Health
10
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
11
Lutheran Social Services Housing Inc

Lss housing will support the continued vitality of north dakota communities by providing housing and housing-related services.

—
12
Wisconsin Lutheran Home Ministries Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rivers and Bluffs Animal Shelter. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $46,587 · OtherHOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC SCHOOLST MARY'S ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $27,563 · OtherST MARY'S ELEMENTARY SCHOOLST JOHN THE BAPTIST SCHOOL: $19,618 · OtherST JOHN THE BAPTIST SCHOOLANNA MARIE'S SHELTER: $17,061 · OtherANNA MARIE'S SHELTERIndividual grant recipient: $14,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $14,052 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $11,349 · Other+37 more: $122,394 · Other+37 moreSOUTHWEST OPTIONS FOR WOMEN: $20,802 · Human ServicesSOUTHWEST O…Roads to Life Tanzania Inc: $8,000 · Human ServicesRoads to Li…THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $5,252 · Human ServicesTHE SHELTER…Life Relaunch Inc: $2,500 · Human ServicesLife Relaun…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC: $21,010 · HealthNEIGHBORH…Agrace HospiceCare Foundation Inc: $5,549 · HealthAgrace Ho…COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION: $5,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY…ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC: $10,000 · InternationalHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC: $2,000 · InternationalStudents for Life of America Inc: $9,964 · Civil RightsY2 BELIEVE INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC: $5,000 · Education
Other$273,124Human Services$37,554Health$31,559International$12,000Civil Rights$9,964Youth Development$5,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC: $21,010 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHWEST OPTIONS FOR WOMEN: $20,802 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetStudents for Life of America Inc: $9,964 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRoads to Life Tanzania Inc: $8,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $5,252 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetY2 BELIEVE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEADWATERS FOOD PANTRY INC: $4,077 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetLife Relaunch Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRIVERS AND BLUFFS ANIMAL SHELTER: $2,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFIREWEED COMMUNITY WOODSHOP: $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWAYFORWARD RESOURCES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST OPTIONS FOR WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Students for Life of America Inc ↗
  • Who funds Roads to Life Tanzania Inc ↗
  • Who funds Agrace HospiceCare Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Y2 BELIEVE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds HEADWATERS FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Life Relaunch Inc ↗
  • Who funds RIVERS AND BLUFFS ANIMAL SHELTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alliant Energy Foundation IncWI14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carolyn M & Leary E Peterson Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carolyn M & Leary E Peterson Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Carolyn M & Leary E Peterson Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Carolyn M & Leary E Peterson Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Carolyn M & Leary E Peterson Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph