· Public charity
Carolina Foothills Foundation
Provides medical and emotional services to terminally ill patients in rutherford county, north carolina.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $528,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $591,114 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $63,114 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $136k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $385k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Out of the Ashes Inc | $125,000 |
| Boys & Girls Clubs of Rutherf | $100,000 |
| Polk County Council on Aging | $100,000 |
| Polk County Health&HumanSer A | $60,000 |
| Saluda Pop-Up Pantry | $40,000 |
| Share Thy Bread | $40,000 |
| Champions for Wildlife | $25,000 |
| Tryon Arts & Crafts School | $16,000 |
| Polk County Film Initiative | $15,000 |
| Polk County Public Libraries | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $695k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $221k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OOOUT OF THE ASHES INC2× · 2023–2025 · $325k · revenue +31% · 36% of their budget
- YSYokefellow Service Center2× · 2023–2024 · $185k · revenue +28%
- BCBASICS CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC2× · 2023–2024 · $40k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- RLRUTHERFORD LIFE SERVICES INCone grant, 2023 · $207k · revenue -10%
- RCRUTHERFORD COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $125k · revenue +172%
- GTGrahamtown Teamone grant, 2023 · $120k · revenue +12% · 26% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Fire protection for the residents of unionville nc
Fire protection services
Fire protection services
Providing volunteer fire department and rescue services to residents of reems creek and beaver dam, north carolina
To provide First Responder and Fire Department Services for Pamlico County NC
To provide fire protection for the community
To provide fire and rescue protection services to the citizens of burke county nc
The volunteer fire department serves the community in and around the town of parkton, nc.
Volunteer fire department
Provide fire protection services and fire prevention education for the community of cooleemee, nc.
The organization's primary mission is fighting fires in the rimer fire district of cabarrus county, north carolina.
To provide fire services to the citizens of rolesville nc
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saluda Volunteer Fire & Rescue Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sunny View Fire and Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OUT OF THE ASHES INC ↗
- Who funds RUTHERFORD LIFE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Yokefellow Service Center ↗
- Who funds POLK COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
- Who funds RUTHERFORD COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds Grahamtown Team ↗
- Who funds Together Each Achieves More NC ↗
- Who funds Rutherford Outdoor Coalition Inc ↗
- Who funds PISGAH LEGAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds PILGRIMS PATHWAY HOUSE OF REFUGE INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH MOUNTAINS CHRISTIAN CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds HICKORY NUT GORGE OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds Share Thy Bread ↗
- Who funds THE SALUDA POP-UP PANTRY ↗
- Who funds BASICS CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds POLK COUNTY FILM INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds UNION MILLS LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds KIDSENSES INC ↗
- Who funds CLIFFSIDE AREA FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
- Who funds Champions for Wildlife ↗
- Who funds UNITY IN THE COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds GREENHILL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
- Who funds BILLS CREEK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
- Who funds ELLENBORO VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
- Who funds SHINGLE HOLLOW VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
- Who funds GREEN CREEK VOLUNTEER FIRE RESCUE ↗
- Who funds SHILOH DANIELTOWN OAKLAND FIRE DEPT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gateway Wellness Foundation · Dogwood Health Trust · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Rhi Legacy Foundation Inc · Polk County Community Foundation Inc · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Wnc Bridge Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The Conservation Fund a Nonprofit Corporation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Manna Food Bank Inc · Timken Foundation of Canton
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Carolina Foothills Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.