Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Carolina Farm Stewardship Association

The association's mission is helping the carolinas grow and eat local, organic food.

$2.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$202k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Food & Nutrition$6.1MInternational$135kHuman Services$40kCommunity Improvement$28kMembership Benefit$23kPublic Benefit$21kCivil Rights$9kEnvironment$9k
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 17 grants below total $1,485,963 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,975,271 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $489,308 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $146k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.3M
$70,986
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRACTOR FOOD & FARMS$201,745
FRESHLIST LLC$197,905
MEN AND WOMEN UNITED FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES CDC$136,092
FARMER FOODSHARE INC$120,778
GLOW HOUSE AGRICULTURE INC$120,482
WORKING LANDSCAPES$114,197
OPERATION SPEING PLANT$107,416
WNC FROM THE GROUND UP$95,601
CONETOE FAMILY LIFE CENTER$70,986
FEAST DOWN EAST INC$62,507
BLACK FARMERS HUB LLC$58,594
CENTER FOR THIRD WORLD ORGANIZING$53,722
SANDHILLS AGINNOVATION CENTER$41,372
BLUE RIDGE WOMEN IN AGRICULTURE$37,203
THE PRODUCE BOX LLC$34,115
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $216k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MEN AND WOMEN UNITED FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES CDC: $136k → 21%ROBESON COUNTY CHURCH AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $6k → 26%NATURAL CAPITAL INVESTMENT FUND: $19k → 9%MEN AND WOMEN UNITED FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES: $39k → 21%MEN AND WOMEN UNITED FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES CDC: $17k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.7M · 20 repeat orgs$645k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +99% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
15

Total granted

$5.7M
$633k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
+29%

Still filing today

55%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    Toe River Aggregation Center Training Organization Regional Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $730k · revenue +82% · 56% of their budget
  • SA
    SANDHILLS AGINNOVATION CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $716k · revenue +651% · 60% of their budget
  • FARMER FOODSHARE INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $463k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • The Abundance Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $288k · revenue -10%
  • SR
    SOUTHEAST RALEIGH VICINITY EMERGING
    one grant, 2020 · $129k
  • TB
    T&A BARBEE FAMILY FARM LLC DBA BARBEE FARMS
    one grant, 2020 · $52k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Broad River Community Market

To create a thriving, equitable food system by working with local farms to provide crucial access to fresh produce to food insecure people in Cleveland County.

Food & Nutrition
2
Hub City Roots

The hub city farmers' market is a nonprofit community organization that aims to increase supply, demand, and access to healthy, local foods in spartanburg, south carolina.

Food & Nutrition
3
Uptown Farmers Market

Our mission is to engage our neighbors around locally grown, fresh foods to support local farmers and food artisans, educate on healthy eating, and eliminate food insecurity in our charlotte community.

Food & Nutrition
4
Edenton Farmers Market

To provide accessibility to heathful, regionally grown or produced food for all residents and vistors regardless of income levels. to provide an educational forum for consumers to learn the uses and benefits of quality, locally grown or…

Food & Nutrition
5
Nc Farm Bureau Legal Foundation Inc
6
Restoring Hope Center Inc

Restoring Hope Center, Inc. is a benovolence organization operating in Laurinburg, NC. The organization has benevolence programs providing food and supplies to the local area, supplies other smaller like-kind organizations, conducts a…

Human Services
7
Bounty & Soul

Together we connect, share, and celebrate nutritious food, education and community.

Food & Nutrition
8
Neighborhood Roots Food Collective Inc

Local food distribution and community education

Food & Nutrition
9
Cumberland County Food Security Council

To initiate and facilitate collaborative action toward a just, resilient, and sustainable food system that ensures equitable access for all people to enough healthy food.

Food & Nutrition
10
Northwest Farms to Families

The NWF2F DBA Minority Growers Collective is a 501(c)3 charitable nonprofit founded in February of 2021 to meet the education, training, and financial assistance needs of agricultural growers and producers of color and meet the needs of…

Food & Nutrition
11
Wnc Food Systems Coalition Inc

To support a community-led food system in WNC that is regenerative, resilient, and equitable by strengthening regional connection and cultivating cross-sector collaboration.

Food & Nutrition
12
Center for an Agricultural Economy Inc

The center for an agricultural economy supports rural communities and working landscapes by building a more interconnected local food system.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Working Landscapes and the most unlike its peers is Center for Third World Organizing. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%13%<5yr17%13%5–10yr20%35%10–20yr15%22%20–35yr11%17%35–55yr10%0%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%5%<5yr17%8%5–10yr20%59%10–20yr15%23%20–35yr11%5%35–55yr10%0%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 8% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
8%
3/36
the rest of the field
15%
4,738/31,089

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
18/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Toe River Aggregation Center Training Organization Regional Inc — $729,693 · Food & NutritionToe River Aggregation Center Training Organi…SANDHILLS AGINNOVATION CENTER INC — $716,427 · Food & NutritionSANDHILLS AGINNOVATION CENTER INCFARMER FOODSHARE INC — $463,014 · Food & NutritionFARMER FOODSHARE INCFEAST DOWN EAST INC — $285,408 · Food & NutritionFEAST DOWN EAST INCBLUE RIDGE WOMEN IN AGRICULTURE — $208,395 · Food & NutritionBLUE RIDGE WOMEN IN AGRICULTUREMCDOWELL LFAC — $84,817 · Food & Nutrition+2 more — $27,053 · Food & NutritionFRESHLIST LLC — $1,081,601 · OtherFRESHLIST LLCTHE PRODUCE BOX LLC — $242,316 · OtherTHE PRODUCE BOX LLCA BETTER CHANCE A BETTER COMMUNITY — $189,174 · OtherA BETTER CHANCE A BETTER COMMUNITYOPERATION SPEING PLANT — $176,916 · OtherOPERATION SPEING PLANTGLOW HOUSE AGRICULTURE INC — $168,648 · OtherGLOW HOUSE AGRICULTURE INCWNC FROM THE GROUND UP — $139,219 · OtherWNC FROM THE GROUND UPSOUTHEAST RALEIGH VICINITY EMERGING — $128,630 · OtherTALL GRASS FOOD BOX — $102,192 · OtherBLACK FARMERS HUB LLC — $95,071 · Other+11 more — $198,670 · Other+11 moreWORKING LANDSCAPES — $370,744 · Community ImprovementEL CENTRO HISPANO INC — $15,295 · Community Improvement+1 more — $13,185 · Community ImprovementCONETOE FAMILY LIFE CENTER INC — $301,370 · Youth DevelopmentThe Abundance Foundation Inc — $288,135 · PhilanthropyMEN & WOMEN UNITED FOR YOUTH & FAMILIES INC — $191,838 · Human ServicesPARTNER COMMUNITY CAPITAL INC — $19,000 · Human Services+1 more — $5,500 · Human ServicesCenter for Third World Organizing — $134,557 · International
Food & Nutrition$2,514,807Other$2,522,437Community Improvement$399,224Youth Development$301,370Philanthropy$288,135Human Services$216,338International$134,557

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetToe River Aggregation Center Training Organization Regional Inc — $729,693 over 3y, 56% of budgetSANDHILLS AGINNOVATION CENTER INC — $716,427 over 5y, 60% of budgetFARMER FOODSHARE INC — $463,014 over 4y, 10% of budgetWORKING LANDSCAPES — $370,744 over 5y, 16% of budgetCONETOE FAMILY LIFE CENTER INC — $301,370 over 3y, 22% of budgetFEAST DOWN EAST INC — $285,408 over 5y, 17% of budgetBLUE RIDGE WOMEN IN AGRICULTURE — $208,395 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetMEN & WOMEN UNITED FOR YOUTH & FAMILIES INC — $191,838 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetCenter for Third World Organizing — $134,557 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMCDOWELL LFAC — $84,817 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetCatawba Farm and Food Coalition — $31,840 over 1y, 15% of budgetNC BUDGET & TAX CENTER — $20,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPARTNER COMMUNITY CAPITAL INC — $19,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBountiful Cities Project — $15,502 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetEL CENTRO HISPANO INC — $15,295 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPENDER COUNTY CHRISTIAN SVCS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC — $14,636 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUpstream Works — $13,185 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetDavidson County Local Food Network — $12,417 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetROBESON COUNTY CHURCH AND COMMUNITY CENTER — $5,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Toe River Aggregation Center Training Organization Regional Inc
  • Who funds SANDHILLS AGINNOVATION CENTER INC
  • Who funds FARMER FOODSHARE INC
  • Who funds WORKING LANDSCAPES
  • Who funds CONETOE FAMILY LIFE CENTER INC
  • Who funds The Abundance Foundation Inc
  • Who funds FEAST DOWN EAST INC
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE WOMEN IN AGRICULTURE
  • Who funds MEN & WOMEN UNITED FOR YOUTH & FAMILIES INC
  • Who funds Center for Third World Organizing
  • Who funds MCDOWELL LFAC
  • Who funds Catawba Farm and Food Coalition
  • Who funds NC BUDGET & TAX CENTER
  • Who funds PARTNER COMMUNITY CAPITAL INC
  • Who funds Bountiful Cities Project
  • Who funds EL CENTRO HISPANO INC
  • Who funds PENDER COUNTY CHRISTIAN SVCS INC
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC
  • Who funds Upstream Works
  • Who funds Davidson County Local Food Network
  • Who funds ROBESON COUNTY CHURCH AND COMMUNITY CENTER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Conservation Fund a Nonprofit CorporationVA33.2× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Conservation Fund a Nonprofit Corporation · Z Smith Reynolds Foundation Inc · The Cannon Foundation Inc · The Golden Leaf Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · North Carolina Community Foundation · Dogwood Health Trust · Mdc Inc · Blueprint North Carolina · Duke University · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Upstream Works

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Carolina Farm Stewardship Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph