Skip to content

· Private foundation

Carlsen Muir Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$983k
Granted FY2024still arriving
54
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$244k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Youth Development$1.4MHousing & Shelter$927kReligion$501kEducation$490kHealth$435kInternational$378kHuman Services$354kArts & Culture$270kOther$0
02FY2024 · 54 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k26 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $386k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $519k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$9.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Improve your tomorrow$244,470
Big BrothersBig Sisters$125,000
Powerhouse Ministries$50,000
Hands for an African Child$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
Orangevale Fair Oaks Comty Fund$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
Make a Wish$25,000
Chico Project SAVE$25,000
Operation Hope$25,000
Journey Church$20,800
Twin Lakes Food Bank$20,000
HART of Folsom$20,000
Anne Carlsen Center$20,000
Theatre for Children$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $440k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Guide Dogs of America: $5k → 14%Angela Hospice: $1k → 21%Fostering Success and Significance: $5k → 8%Guide Dogs of America: $5k → 14%Guide Dogs of America: $5k → 14%Guide Dogs of America: $5k → 14%Guide Dogs of America: $5k → 14%Guide Dogs of America: $5k → 14%Guide Dogs of America: $5k → 14%Heat Up St Louis: $500 → 21%Wellsprings Womens Center: $10k → 12%Wind Youth Services: $2k → 12%Hands for an African Child: $140k → 12%Hands for an African Child: $50k → 12%Hands for an African Child: $50k → 12%Hands for an African Child: $50k → 12%Hands for an African Child: $10k → 12%Hands for an African Child: $10k → 12%Flights to Freedom: $1k → 12%American Red Cross: $15k → 12%American Red Cross: $10k → 12%American Red Cross: $10k → 12%American Red Cross: $10k → 12%American Red Cross: $10k → 12%American Red Cross: $10k → 12%Anchor Therapy Clinic: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
ID
ND
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
SD
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
NC
SC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 13% of Carlsen Muir Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 88% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 78%.

Carlsen Muir Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.1M · 68 repeat orgs$417k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

68 repeat relationships: 36 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

68
52

Total granted

$5.1M
$308k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+26%

Still filing today

41%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $109k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ANNE CARLSEN CENTER
    7× · 2018–2024 · $330k · revenue +28%
  • IY
    IMPROVE YOUR TOMORROW INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $314k · revenue +378%
  • HF
    Hands for an African Child Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $310k · revenue +516%

Funded once

  • SR
    Sacramento Regional Community Found
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • SS
    Sierra Sacramento Valley Medical So
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • WE
    WOMEN'S EMPOWERMENTgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
2
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
3
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
4
Alliance for Safety and Justice

Just safe's mission is to educate the public about the needs of communities most impacted by crime, violence, and incarceration; and promote new safety solutions through community-building, leadership development, grassroots mobilization,…

Crime & Legal
5
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
Sacramento Region Community Foundation

The Sacramento Region Community Foundation leads, serves, and inspires enduring philanthropy for a just and vibrant Sacramento region.

Philanthropy
7
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
8
Valley Vision

Valley vision is a civic leadership organization dedicated to improving the livability of the sacramento region. through research and action, we collaborate on bold, long-term solutions that improve people's lives.

Community Improvement
9
Sacramento Children's Home

At the sacramento children's home, we are committed to opening doors to the future by maximizing the potential of children and families.

Human Services
10
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
11
Sacramento Food Bank & Family Services

Dedicated to assisting those in need by alleviating their immediate pain and problems and moving them toward self-sufficiency and financial independence.

—
12
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of the Napa Valley; the most unlike its peers is Flights to Freedom. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 142 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
64/65
Grantees still filing
47/65
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Big BrothersBig Sisters: $504,191 · OtherBig BrothersBig SistersIndividual grant recipient: $378,170 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPOWERHOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $345,390 · OtherPOWERHOUSE MINISTRIES INCHabitat for Humanity: $290,000 · OtherHabitat for HumanityHome Aid Sacramento: $290,000 · OtherHome Aid SacramentoWEAVE INC: $285,000 · OtherWEAVE INCOperation Hope: $170,000 · OtherTwin Lakes Food Bank: $135,000 · Other+101 more: $1,466,024 · Other+101 moreHands for an African Child Inc: $310,000 · Human ServicesHands for …HART OF FOLSOM: $75,000 · Human ServicesHART OF FO…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $65,000 · Human ServicesAmerican N…International Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America: $35,000 · Human ServicesInternatio…+7 more: $29,500 · Human Services+7 moreIMPROVE YOUR TOMORROW INC: $314,470 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS HEART OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $31,200 · Youth DevelopmentANNE CARLSEN CENTER: $330,000 · EducationWOMEN'S EMPOWERMENT: $20,000 · EducationALBION COLLEGE: $15,000 · Education+5 more: $12,400 · EducationTHEATRE FOR CHILDREN INC DBA B STREET THEATRE: $235,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $10,150 · Arts & CultureForest Park Forever Inc: $30,000 · EnvironmentCALIFORNIA WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION: $21,620 · EnvironmentWILDLAND FIREFIGHTER FOUNDATION: $12,500 · EnvironmentCHICO PROJECT S A V E: $25,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $15,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 · International
Other$3,863,775Human Services$514,500Youth Development$405,670Education$377,400Arts & Culture$245,150Environment$64,120International$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANNE CARLSEN CENTER: $330,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetIMPROVE YOUR TOMORROW INC: $314,470 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetHands for an African Child Inc: $310,000 over 6y, 18% of budgetWEAVE INC: $285,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetTHEATRE FOR CHILDREN INC DBA B STREET THEATRE: $235,000 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetTwin Lakes Food Bank: $135,000 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetHART OF FOLSOM: $75,000 over 7y, 19% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $65,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS HEART OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA: $60,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSACRAMENTO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $45,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America: $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $31,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetForest Park Forever Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHICO PROJECT S A V E: $25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetBetter Life Foundation Inc: $22,895 over 6y, 13% of budgetCALIFORNIA WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION: $21,620 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S EMPOWERMENT: $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSACRAMENTO SELF-HELP HOUSING INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEAL FUTURE FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALBION COLLEGE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Post Traumatic Growth: $13,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetWILDLAND FIREFIGHTER FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWELLSPRING WOMEN'S CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRESTAURANT WORKERS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetALMANOR FISHING ASSOCIATION: $7,575 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetSPONDYLITIS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS OF SACRAMENTO: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetOAKLAND SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFostering Success and Significance: $5,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetST LOUIS INTEGRATED HEALTH NETWORK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY CALIFORNIA CAPITAL REGION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL SPORTSMEN'S FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMurer House Foundation: $3,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSACRAMENTO COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $2,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRiver City Theatre Company: $2,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetESKATON FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSacramento Splash: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOPENING DOORS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANNE CARLSEN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds IMPROVE YOUR TOMORROW INC ↗
  • Who funds Hands for an African Child Inc ↗
  • Who funds WEAVE INC ↗
  • Who funds THEATRE FOR CHILDREN INC DBA B STREET THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds Twin Lakes Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds HART OF FOLSOM ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS HEART OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds SACRAMENTO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds International Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds Forest Park Forever Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHICO PROJECT S A V E ↗
  • Who funds Better Life Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S EMPOWERMENT ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sacramento Region Community FoundationCA34.4× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sacramento Region Community Foundation · Teichert Foundation · California Foundation for Stronger Communities · Kelly Foundation · Dignity Health · Ed and Betty Manoyan Foundation · United Way California Capital Region · Sierra Health Foundation · Setzer Foundation · Sutter Valley Hospitals · Deacon Charitable Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carlsen Muir Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carlsen Muir Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 46%
  • Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc: 46% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 142 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Carlsen Muir Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph