Skip to content
Carl S & Wanda M Weyandt Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Carl S & Wanda M Weyandt Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Public Safety & Disaster$56kHealth$54kHuman Services$52kReligion$36kHousing & Shelter$27kEducation$25kInternational$24kFood & Nutrition$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$766k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCH OF THE ASSUMPTION$5,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL$3,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$3,000
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$3,000
TARAHUMARA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FUND$2,500
HOMER CITY FIRE DEPTARTMENT$2,000
ST JUDES RESEARCH HOSPITAL$2,000
SMILE TRAIN$2,000
AULTMAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
OPERATION SMILE$1,500
GENERAL SECRETARIAT OF THE FRANCISCAN MISSIONS INC$1,000
LIFE CHOICES$1,000
LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION$1,000
GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%TARAHUMARA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FUND: $8k → 8%TARAHUMARA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FUND: $4k → 8%TARAHUMARA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FUND: $4k → 8%TARAHUMARA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FUND: $3k → 8%TARAHUMARA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FUND: $3k → 8%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 11%TARAHUMARA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FUND: $3k → 8%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 11%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 11%ALICE PAUL HOUSE: $4k → 14%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 11%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $2k → 11%ALICE PAUL HOUSE: $2k → 14%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 11%ALICE PAUL HOUSE: $2k → 14%ALICE PAUL HOUSE: $1k → 14%INDIANA COUNTY COMMUNTIY ACTION: $500 → 14%ALICE PAUL HOUSE: $500 → 14%INDIANA COUNTY COMMUNTIY ACTION: $500 → 14%INDIANA COUNTY COMMUNTIY ACTION: $500 → 14%ALICE PAUL HOUSE: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
WI
NY
OR
PA
WV
VA
MD
KS
AR
TN
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$309k · 33 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
2

Total granted

$309k
$2k

Still filing today

61%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesInternationalHealthArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $20k · revenue +67%
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $14k · revenue +26%
  • LO
    LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $14k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2024 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
2
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
3
Humane Fort Wayne Inc

Humane fort wayne is a trusted partner providing comprehensive, lifesaving resources to pets and their people.

Animals
4
Lake Humane Society

Mission: to protect animals and build connections between pets and people through advocacy and education. vision: leading and guiding a humane lake county core values: compassion for pets and people. engagement through innovative programs,…

Animals
5
Alley Cat Rescue Inc

ACRs programs promote better care for community cats through trap-neuter-return. Local programs include placing unwanted cats in new homes, running a low-cost spay/neuter clinic, and providing support for local feral cat caretakers.…

Animals
6
Indy Neighborhood Cats Inc

To improve the quality of life for unowned neighborhood cats and the community they live in by reducing overpopulation through trap, neuter, return (tnr).

Animals
7
International Committee of the Red Cross

The international committee of the red cross (switzerland)(icrc) is an impartial, neutral, and independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives and dignity of victims of armed conflict and of violence…

International
8
Children's Bureau Inc

Empowering individuals to build stronger families and communities.

Human Services
9
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
10
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Wake County Inc

Located in raleigh, nc, the spca of wake county works in over half the state of north carolina through collaborative partnerships that save pets and help people. significant activities include: decreasing the number of animals entering…

Animals
11
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
12
Childfund International Usa

Childfund's mission is to help deprived, excluded and vulnerable children have the capacity to become young adults, parents and leaders who bring lasting and positive change to their communities, and to promote societies whose individuals…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alice Paul House; the most unlike its peers is Chiredzi River African Wildlife Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
12/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHURCH OF THE ASSUMPTION: $35,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE ASSUMPTIONCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $18,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESSMILE TRAIN INC: $14,000 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INCLIFE CHOICES INC: $13,500 · OtherLIFE CHOICES INCIndividual grant recipient: $11,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOMER CITY FIRE DEPT: $11,000 · OtherHOMER CITY FIRE DEPTAULTMAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $9,500 · OtherAULTMAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTCORAL GRACETON FIRE DEPARTMENT: $7,500 · OtherRED CROSS OF INDIANA CO: $6,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $6,500 · OtherINDIANA COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS: $6,300 · OtherGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $9,000 · OtherGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK+10 more: $20,000 · Other+10 moreTARAHUMARA CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FUND: $23,500 · Human ServicesTARAHUMARA CHILDR…LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $13,500 · Human ServicesLIGHT OF LIFE MIN…ALICE PAUL HOUSE: $10,000 · Human ServicesALICE PAUL HOUSE+1 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesInternational Rescue Committee INC: $19,500 · InternationalInternatio…OPERATION SMILE INC: $7,500 · InternationalOPERATION …UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $3,000 · InternationalUNITED STA…THE FOUNDATION FOR INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA (IUP): $25,000 · EducationTHE FOUND…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $10,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,000 · HealthCHIREDZI RIVER AFRICAN WILDLIFE TRUST: $8,000 · AnimalsINDIANA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,550 · AnimalsSMALL TOWN CAT RESCUE: $1,500 · AnimalsCALI CATS RESCUE: $1,200 · AnimalsFOUR FOOTED FRIENDS: $1,000 · AnimalsSISTERS PLACE INC: $13,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$168,300Human Services$48,500International$30,000Education$25,000Health$14,500Animals$13,250Housing & Shelter$13,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA (IUP): $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTARAHUMARA CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FUND: $23,500 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $19,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE CHOICES INC: $13,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $13,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSISTERS PLACE INC: $13,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALICE PAUL HOUSE: $10,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHIREDZI RIVER AFRICAN WILDLIFE TRUST: $8,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $7,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA COUNTY YMCA (5647): $3,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,550 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSMALL TOWN CAT RESCUE: $1,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetINDIANA COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCALI CATS RESCUE: $1,200 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCANTERBURY SHAKER VILLAGE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOUR FOOTED FRIENDS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA (IUP) ↗
  • Who funds TARAHUMARA CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE CHOICES INC ↗
  • Who funds LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SISTERS PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds ALICE PAUL HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CHIREDZI RIVER AFRICAN WILDLIFE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA COUNTY YMCA (5647) ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SMALL TOWN CAT RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds CALI CATS RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds CANTERBURY SHAKER VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUR FOOTED FRIENDS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Bancorp Charitable…The Pittsburgh Founda…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
St Bancorp Charitable FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Bancorp Charitable Foundation · The Pittsburgh Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carl S & Wanda M Weyandt Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carl S & Wanda M Weyandt Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Carl S & Wanda M Weyandt’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home