Skip to content

· Private foundation

Carl M Hansen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$149k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$585kArts & Culture$188kFood & Nutrition$184kHealth$112kScience & Tech$90kReligion$63kHousing & Shelter$58kHuman Services$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $75k
$6,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 100% of reported assets are held in Washington Trust Bank.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SECOND HARVEST INLAND NW$13,000
WASHINGTON STATE UNIV COLLEGE OF NURSING$11,500
UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$10,000
WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY$10,000
WASHINGTON STATE UNIV ENGINEERINGCOMPUTER SCIENCE$10,000
GONZAGA UNIVERSITY$10,000
SPOKANE SYMPHONY$8,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$7,500
NORTHWEST MUSEUM OF ARTS AND CULTURE$7,000
UNION GOSPEL MISSION$6,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$6,000
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY$5,000
UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $11k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $11k → 9%SECOND HARVEST INLAND NW: $14k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $11k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $11k → 9%SECOND HARVEST INLAND NW: $14k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $11k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $11k → 9%SECOND HARVEST INLAND NW: $13k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $11k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $11k → 9%SECOND HARVEST INLAND NW: $12k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $11k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $11k → 9%SECOND HARVEST INLAND NW: $12k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $10k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $10k → 9%SECOND HARVEST INLAND NW: $12k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $10k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $10k → 9%SECOND HARVEST INLAND NW: $11k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $9k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $10k → 9%SECOND HARVEST INLAND NW: $10k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $9k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $9k → 9%SECOND HARVEST INLAND NW: $10k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $9k → 9%GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $11k → 12%WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $11k → 12%GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $11k → 12%WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $11k → 12%GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $11k → 12%WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $11k → 12%GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $11k → 12%WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $11k → 12%GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $11k → 12%WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $11k → 12%GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $10k → 12%WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $10k → 12%GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $10k → 12%WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $10k → 12%GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $9k → 12%WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $9k → 12%GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $9k → 12%WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $9k → 12%MEALS ON WHEELS: $10k → 12%MEALS ON WHEELS: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
IL
OR
IN
CA
UT
CO
MD
AZ
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 29 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
15

Total granted

$1.3M
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+13%

Still filing today

45%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST
    9× · 2017–2025 · $107k · revenue +46%
  • CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $104k · revenue +42%
  • WU
    WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $102k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • WC
    WSU COLLEGE OF NURSING
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • WS
    WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • EA
    EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seattle University

Seattle University is dedicated to educating the whole person, to professional formation, and to empowering leaders for a just and humane world.

—
2
Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences

Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences educates and trains health care professionals emphasizing service among rural and medically under-served communities throughout the Northwest.

Education
3
Independent Colleges of Washington

Independent colleges of washington is the leading advocate for not-for-profit, private campuses in washington state.

Education
4
Northwest Conference

Through its values, the northwest conference unites its member colleges and universities in the pacific northwest to empower student-athletes in their pursuit of academic and athletic excellence at the division iii level.

Recreation & Sports
5
Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities

Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities accredits institutions of higher education by applying evidence-informed standards and processes to support continuous improvements and promote equitable student achievement and success.

Education
6
Seattle Symphony Orchestra Inc

To present symphonic music of the highest quality in a distinctive way for the cultural enrichment, education, engagement and enjoyment of the people of our community.

Arts & Culture
7
Spokane International Academy

Spokane International Academy empowers its students with the academic skills, habits of mind and global competence necessary to complete advanced courses in high school and a four-year college degree in order to become leaders who can…

Education
8
Innovation Spokane Schools

To prepare a diverse range of students for a life of learning in post-secondary education, citizenship, and leadership.

Education
9
Seattle Pacific University

Seattle pacific university is a christian university fully committed to engaging the culture and changing the world by graduating people of competence and character, becoming people of wisdom, and modeling grace-filled community.

Education
10
The Seattle Academy of Arts & Sciences

Seattle academy is a dynamic community that challenges students to question, imagine, and create in order to contribute to a changing world.

Education
11
The University of British Columbia

Pursuing excellence in research learning and engagement to foster global citizenship and advance a sustainable and just society across British Columbia Canada and the world.

Education
12
Northwest University

We, the people of northwest university, carry the call of god by continually building a learning community dedicated to spiritual vitality, academic excellence, and empowered engagement with human need.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Corporation of Gonzaga University; the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
16/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $145,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONUNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $101,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IDAHOWASHINGTON STATE UNIV COLLEGE OF NURSING: $92,500 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE UNIV COLLEGE OF NURSINGWASHINGTON STATE UNIV ENGINEERINGCOMPUTER SCIENCE: $83,750 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE UNIV ENGINEERINGCOMPUTER SCIENCEMEALS ON WHEELS: $76,500 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELSUNION GOSPEL MISSION: $63,000 · OtherUNION GOSPEL MISSIONNORTHWEST MUSEUM OF ARTS AND CULTURE: $58,500 · OtherNORTHWEST MUSEUM OF ARTS AND CULTUREHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $57,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY+24 more: $229,750 · Other+24 moreCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $103,500 · EducationCORPORATION OF GONZ…WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $101,500 · EducationWHITWORTH UNIVERSIT…SPOKANE COLLEGES FOUNDATION: $13,900 · EducationSPOKANE COLLEGES FO…+4 more: $19,000 · Education+4 moreSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST: $107,000 · Food & NutritionSpokane Symphony Society: $63,000 · Arts & CultureSpokane Art School: $16,500 · Arts & CultureSPOKANE CHAMBER MUSIC ASSOCIATION: $6,750 · Arts & CultureMUSICFEST NORTHWEST: $5,250 · Arts & CultureBoys & Girls Club of Spokane County: $6,850 · Youth DevelopmentNorthwest Kidney Kids Inc: $4,250 · Human ServicesFeast Collective: $1,000 · EmploymentJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WASHINGTON: $1,000 · International
Other$908,500Education$237,900Food & Nutrition$107,000Arts & Culture$91,500Youth Development$6,850Human Services$4,250Employment$1,000International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST: $107,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $103,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $101,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSpokane Symphony Society: $63,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetConnoisseur Concerts Association: $30,250 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetSpokane Art School: $16,500 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetSPOKANE COLLEGES FOUNDATION: $13,900 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP FIRE INLAND NORTHWEST: $8,750 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Spokane County: $6,850 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSPOKANE CHAMBER MUSIC ASSOCIATION: $6,750 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetMUSICFEST NORTHWEST: $5,250 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIllinois Institute of Technology: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwest Kidney Kids Inc: $4,250 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetWALLA WALLA UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPOKANE YOUTH SYMPHONY INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WASHINGTON: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Spokane Symphony Society ↗
  • Who funds Connoisseur Concerts Association ↗
  • Who funds Spokane Art School ↗
  • Who funds SPOKANE COLLEGES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAMP FIRE INLAND NORTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Spokane County ↗
  • Who funds SPOKANE CHAMBER MUSIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MUSICFEST NORTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Illinois Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds Northwest Kidney Kids Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Innovia FoundationWA20.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Innovia Foundation · The Avista Foundation · Johnston-Fix Foundation · Johnston-Hanson Foundation · Artsfund · Believe in Me · Pierce Charitable Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carl M Hansen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carl M Hansen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Carl M Hansen Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Carl M Hansen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Carl M Hansen’s filings →

More from the funding graph