· Private foundation
Carl E Panebiango Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $27k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $128k
- $250k+1 grant · $965k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $965,000 |
| HE SAVED ALL INC | $42,000 |
| BELLE CHASSE ROTARY FOUNDATION INC | $25,000 |
| FAITH CHRISTIAN CHURCH | $21,000 |
| THE FAIRY GODFATHERS INC | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITY CENTER FOR LIFE INC | $10,000 |
| NEXT GENERATION MINISTRIES | $10,000 |
| FREEDOM AND FASHION INC | $10,000 |
| NEW ORLEANS BALLET ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| RESURRECTION LIFE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH | $5,000 |
| LES DUDES | $5,000 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS LOUISIANA INC | $5,000 |
| FIRST BAPTIAST CHURCH | $2,500 |
| HOGS FOR THE CAUSE | $1,250 |
| HORNET SIDE LINE CLUB | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $103k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BCBelle Chasse Rotary Foundation Inc3× · 2023–2025 · $75k · revenue +42%
- TFTHE FERAL ORG5× · 2020–2025 · $29k · revenue +16%
- H4HEARTS 4 HIM INC2× · 2018–2019 · $12k · revenue +68%
Funded once
- AHAmerican Heart Association Incgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +26%
- RPRIVER PORK PILOTS INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue +105%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Ashley Code Project is a non-profit organization created with the purpose of helping fulfill Ashley's dream of finding a cure for cancer by raising funds for pediatric brain cancer research and treatment in the New Orleans area.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hogs for the Cause Inc and the most unlike its peers is Our Big Sky Ranch. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 19% of your grantees by number, and just 19% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Belle Chasse Rotary Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds NEXT GENERATION MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE FERAL ORG ↗
- Who funds CAFE HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds HEARTS 4 HIM INC ↗
- Who funds RIVER PORK PILOTS INC ↗
- Who funds The Fairy Godfathers Inc ↗
- Who funds Bravo Programs of America Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CENTER FOR LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds New Orleans Ballet Association ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS LOUISIANA INC ↗
- Who funds LES DUDES ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL AMATEUR BASEBALL FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE BRAVO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds POPLARVILLE ASSOCIATION OF ATHLETICS INC ↗
- Who funds BELLE CHASSE ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds HOGS FOR THE CAUSE INC ↗
- Who funds GRACE ASHLEY SCASNY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baptist Community Ministries · The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Gayle and Tom Benson Charitable Foundation · Goldring Family Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Carl E Panebiango Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Carl E Panebiango Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Carl E Panebiango Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.