Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Caris Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$2.7M
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

International$18MEducation$17MYouth Development$603kPhilanthropy$389kPublic Benefit$200kHuman Services$163kReligion$155kHealth$26kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $134k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $307k
  • $250k+2 grants · $5.3M
$35,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARIS FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL$2,747,576
ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$2,550,000
GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION$100,000
FORTRESS YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER$91,001
BANDS MINISTRIES$65,786
CL - CHANGING LIVES$50,000
TOUCH A LIFE FOUNDATION INC$35,000
NEW YORK CANCER FOUNDATION$25,100
VAN ZANDT-GUINN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$21,467
MCKINNEY NELL BURKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$20,942
LAKE CITIES CHURCH OF CHRIST$11,168
HEALTH TALENTS INTERNATIONAL$10,125
YMCA OF METROPOLITAN FT WORTH$10,000
PROSPER HIGH SCHOOL BASS FISHING CLUB$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SUPPORT OUR TROOPS: $5k → 8%CL - CHANGING LIVES: $50k → 8%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN FT WORTH: $10k → 11%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN FORT WORTH: $10k → 11%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN FORT WORTH: $10k → 11%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN FORT WORTH: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
AZ
AR
NC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$19M · 15 repeat orgs$229k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
13

Total granted

$19M
$154k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+143%

Still filing today

60%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FY
    FORTRESS YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $558k · revenue +33%
  • TG
    THE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +15%
  • HT
    HEALTH TALENTS INTERNATIONAL INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $125k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • ZP
    ZOIES PLACE
    one grant, 2017 · $35k · revenue -42%
  • SP
    SHILOH PLACE MCKINNEYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +199%
  • TG
    THE GATHERING PLACE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +17%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christ's Hospital
2
Christian Ministries International
3
Christian Foundation
4
Gilchrist Foundation
Philanthropy
5
The Life of Christ Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
6
Capital Christian Ministries

Capital christian ministries is a non-profit organization committed to transforming lives on the continent of africa. we are doing this through leadership programs, education assistance, partnering with capital christian worship centers…

Religion
7
Triumph in Christ Ministrie

Ticmi was founded by helen melahouris with a passion to bring hope and healing to the world. the focus of the ministry is three-fold: 1. igniting passion through intercession and the teaching of the word to set god's children around the…

8
New Life Foundation
9
Partners in Christ

Collaborating with latin american grantees to identify and address their specific challenges through active listening and question driven understanding, nurturing their goals and objectives.

10
God's Gift Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Global Commission Partners Inc

Global commission partners is an evangelical missionary not for profit organization dedicated to evaluate and support native ministries who are planting the gospel of jesus christ among unreach people groups in poor countries.

Philanthropy
12
Christ for Humanity Inc

Christ for humanity (cfh) is a christian humanitarian relief organization whose purpose is to glorify god by enabling the church to advance the gospel of jesus christ to the needy. cfh's goal is to provide christian field workers with the…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Touch-a-Life and the most unlike its peers is Caris Foundation International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%0%<5yr17%10%5–10yr19%35%10–20yr15%20%20–35yr8%15%35–55yr13%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%0%<5yr17%0%5–10yr19%50%10–20yr15%3%20–35yr8%0%35–55yr13%47%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
16%
5,829/35,445

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $16,484,500 · OtherABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY+17 more — $504,972 · OtherCARIS FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL — $16,653,024 · InternationalCARIS FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL+2 more — $85,000 · InternationalGLOBAL HEALTH CORPS INC — $850,000 · HealthHEALTH TALENTS INTERNATIONAL INC — $125,125 · Health+1 more — $25,100 · HealthFORTRESS YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $557,676 · Youth DevelopmentTOUCH A LIFE FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentBANDS MINISTRIES — $379,187 · Philanthropy+1 more — $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION — $200,000 · EducationCL - CHANGING LIVES — $50,000 · Human ServicesYMCA of Metropolitan Fort Worth — $35,000 · Human ServicesSUPPORT OUR TROOPS INC — $5,000 · Human Services
Other$16,989,472International$16,738,024Health$1,000,225Youth Development$602,676Philanthropy$389,187Education$200,000Human Services$90,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCARIS FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL — $16,653,024 over 8y, 56% of budgetABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $16,484,500 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetGLOBAL HEALTH CORPS INC — $850,000 over 6y, 6.0% of budgetFORTRESS YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $557,676 over 8y, 12% of budgetBANDS MINISTRIES — $379,187 over 8y, 32% of budgetTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHEALTH TALENTS INTERNATIONAL INC — $125,125 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetTOUCH-A-LIFE — $75,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetCL - CHANGING LIVES — $50,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetTOUCH A LIFE FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetYMCA of Metropolitan Fort Worth — $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetZOIES PLACE — $35,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetSHILOH PLACE MCKINNEY — $25,400 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetNew York Cancer Foundation — $25,100 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE GATHERING PLACE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGRANT FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HENDERSON COUNTY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe LV Project Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetSUPPORT OUR TROOPS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CARIS FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds GLOBAL HEALTH CORPS INC
  • Who funds FORTRESS YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC
  • Who funds BANDS MINISTRIES
  • Who funds THE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HEALTH TALENTS INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds TOUCH-A-LIFE
  • Who funds CL - CHANGING LIVES
  • Who funds TOUCH A LIFE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds YMCA of Metropolitan Fort Worth
  • Who funds ZOIES PLACE
  • Who funds SHILOH PLACE MCKINNEY
  • Who funds New York Cancer Foundation
  • Who funds THE GATHERING PLACE INC
  • Who funds BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS INC
  • Who funds GRANT FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HENDERSON COUNTY INC
  • Who funds The LV Project Inc
  • Who funds SUPPORT OUR TROOPS INC
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX18.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Halbert Harmon Foundation · Rainwater Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Caris Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph