Skip to content
Caring Across Generations Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Caring Across Generations Inc

Our mission is to change our culture and policy in America to value and support caregiving.

$843k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 22 grants below total $691,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $843,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $151,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k18 grants · $352k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $340k
$20,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$8.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Justice in Aging$150,000
The ICA Group Inc$90,000
Missouri Jobs with Justice$50,000
Equality California Institute$50,000
National Women's Law Center$40,000
Pilipino Workers Center of Southern California$40,000
MomsRising Education Fund (MREF)$40,000
Autistic Self Advocacy Network$30,000
Community Partners$25,000
Bend the Arc A Jewish Partnership for Justice Hand in Hand$20,000
Tides Center$20,000
Access Living$18,500
New Disabled South$15,000
9 To 5 National Association Of Working Women$15,000
Black Californians United for Early Care and Education$15,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 39% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Tides Center: $20k → 10%The Arc of the United States: $13k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
CA
MO
MD
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Legal Advocacy Network Dba Glow

The National Legal Advocacy Network d/b/a Grassroots Law & Organizing for Workers is a legal non-profit organization dedicated to using legal strategies as a tool to build power for marginalized workers and create systemic change through…

Crime & Legal
2
Asian Law Caucus

The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…

Crime & Legal
3
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
4
Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Aajc Inc

The mission of asian americans advancing justice-aajc (aajc) is to advance civil and human rights for asian americans and to build and promote a fair and equitable society for all.

Civil Rights
5
Afl-Cio Union Lawyers Alliance

Afl-cio union lawyers alliance was established to better the conditions of working men and women and their families by enhancing the quality of legal representation that is available to the afl-cio and the national and international unions…

—
6
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
7
Association of Legal Administrators

Ala is the catalyst for growth by providing: diverse educational experiences, engaged peer communities, strategic solutions, dynamic resources, and trusted networks.

—
8
Missouri Jobs With Justice Voter Action

To develop and advocate for legislation, regulations, ballot initiatives, and government programs as a voice of the working class, to promote social justice, and to stimulate the economy; and, to conduct research, educate the public, and…

Civil Rights
9
National Employment Lawyers Assoc Inc

The national employment lawyers association's (nela) mission is to empower workers' rights attorneys through legal training, promoting a fair judiciary, and advocating for laws and policies that level the playing field for workers. we…

—
10
The National Association of State Workforce Agencies

The national association of state workforce agencies (naswa) mission is to enhance the state workforce agencies' ability to accomplish their goals, statutory roles and responsibilities.

—
11
Justice Action Center

Justice Action Center JAC pilots an innovative model that advances the rights of immigrant communities by connecting cutting-edge impact litigation and compelling narrative and communications content. The purpose of JAC is to advance the…

Civil Rights
12
American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California

The american civil liberties union of northern california (aclu nc union) defends and advances the principles of freedom, equality and justice contained in the united states constitution. aclu nc union, a california mutual benefit…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago; the most unlike its peers is California Alliance for Retired Americans. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
7/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JUSTICE IN AGING: $150,000 · OtherJUSTICE IN AGINGTHE ICA GROUP INC: $90,000 · OtherTHE ICA GROUP INCNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $40,000 · OtherNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTERAccess Living of Metropolitan Chicago: $18,500 · Other9TO5 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKING WOMEN INC: $15,000 · OtherBLACK CALIFORNIANS UNITED FOR EARLY CARE AND EDUCATION: $15,000 · Other+4 more: $40,000 · Other+4 moreMOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND: $40,000 · PhilanthropyMOMSRISING …BEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE: $20,000 · PhilanthropyBEND THE AR…MICHIGAN ORGANIZING PROJECT: $10,000 · PhilanthropyMICHIGAN OR…PILIPINO WORKERS CENTER OF SOUTHERN: $40,000 · Community ImprovementPILIPINO W…COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $25,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY …EQUALITY CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE: $50,000 · Public BenefitMISSOURI JOBS WITH JUSTICE: $50,000 · EmploymentAUTISTIC SELF ADVOCACY NETWORK INC: $30,000 · HealthNew Disabled South Inc: $15,000 · HealthTIDES CENTER: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES: $13,000 · Human ServicesCALIFORNIA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$368,500Philanthropy$70,000Community Improvement$65,000Public Benefit$50,000Employment$50,000Health$45,000Human Services$43,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJUSTICE IN AGING: $150,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE ICA GROUP INC: $90,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetEQUALITY CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMISSOURI JOBS WITH JUSTICE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND: $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPILIPINO WORKERS CENTER OF SOUTHERN: $40,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAUTISTIC SELF ADVOCACY NETWORK INC: $30,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAccess Living of Metropolitan Chicago: $18,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget9TO5 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKING WOMEN INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBLACK CALIFORNIANS UNITED FOR EARLY CARE AND EDUCATION: $15,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetNew Disabled South Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES: $13,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMichigan Advocacy Program: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE LOBBYISTS ACTION NETWORK: $10,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetMICHIGAN ORGANIZING PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tides FoundationNational Domestic Wor…Rockefeller Philanthr…Amalgamated Charitabl…WK Kellogg FoundationThe Robert Wood Johns…ImpactassetsincNEO Philanthropy IncNew Venture FundThe Ford FoundationLiberty Hill Foundati…Hopewell Fund
Tides FoundationCA22.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tides Foundation · National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Impactassetsinc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · New Venture Fund · The Ford Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · Hopewell Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Caring Across Generations Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Caring Across Generations Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Caring Across Generations Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Caring Across Generations Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Caring Across Generations’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home