Skip to content
Care Share Health Allianceinc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Care Share Health Allianceinc

Care share health alliance is a north carolina-based nonprofit organization advancing community health and wellbeing through systems change.

$44k
Granted FY2018
3
Grants FY2018
2
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Health$89kHuman Services$39kCrime & Legal$11k
02FY2018 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $36k
$18,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WAKE CO MED SOCTY COMM HEALTH FD$18,196
MOUNTAIN PROJECTS INC$18,000
COMMUNITIES JOINED IN ACTION$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COUNCIL ON AGING OF BUNCOMBE COUNTY: $11k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wnc Health Network Inc

WNC Health Network, Inc supports people and organizations to improve community health and wellbeing across Western North Carolina.

Health
2
Health Care Partners of South Carolina Inc

The organization provides health care to individuals regardless of their ability to pay. this is a direct fulfillment of their tax exempt purpose.

Health
3
Appalachian Mountain Community Health Centers

The organization provides health care to individuals regardless of their ability to pay. this is a direct fulfillment of their tax exempt purpose.

Health
4
Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST

—
5
Georgia Mountains Health Services Inc

The mission of Georgia Mountains Health Services, Inc. is to be responsive to the primary and preventative medical, dental, and behavioral health needs of our communities in a manner that delivers quality care which is accessible and…

Health
6
Carolina Health Centers Inc

Carolina health centers offers primary care and patient support services to improve health, well-being and quality of life throughout the communities we serve.

Health
7
Western North Carolina Community Health Services Inc

To offer primary health, oral health, behavioral health, pharmacy, and support services to residents of buncombe and mcdowell counties, north carolina, in order to provide high-quality and life-enriching whole-person health care.

—
8
Tri-County Community Health Council Inc

Provider of comprehensive, compassionate, high quality primary medical, dental, pharmacy and behavioral health services in southeastern north carolina.

—
9
Mountainlands Community Health Center

To provide medical, mental health, dental care, and affordable medicine to the medically underserved population.

Health
10
Community Care of West Virginia Inc

The mission of ccwv is to help our communities live the healthiest lives possible by meeting their immediate and long-term healthcare needs. this mission is accomplished by providing high quality, accessible, comprehensive, culturally…

—
11
Mountaineer Community Health Center

To provide primary medical care service in a rural community.

Health
12
Palmetto Health Council Inc

Palmetto Health Council, Inc will be the model of excellence for improving the total health status of the communities it serves. All of our employees will provide comprehensive preventative, curative, and life-enhancing services in a…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mountain Community Health Partnership Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pisgah Legal Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WAKE COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC (DBA RIGHTCARE): $18,196 · HealthWAKE COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION…HIGH COUNTRY COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $10,500 · HealthHIGH COUNTRY COMMUNITY HEALTH INCMOUNTAIN COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INC: $10,500 · HealthMOUNTAIN COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INCWestern Carolina Medical Society Foundation Inc: $10,500 · HealthWestern Carolina Medical Society Foundation IncCAREREACH INC: $10,500 · HealthCAREREACH INCTHE COMMUNITY HEALTH LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC: $8,000 · HealthTHE COMMUNITY HEALTH LEADERSHIP NETWORK INCMOUNTAIN PROJECTS INC: $28,500 · OtherMOUNTAIN PROJECTS INCAPPALACHIAN DISTRICT HEALTH DEPT: $10,500 · OtherAPPALACHIAN DISTRICT HEALTH DEPTBLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $10,500 · OtherBLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INCPISGAH LEGAL SERVICES: $10,500 · Crime & LegalCOUNCIL ON AGING OF BUNCOMBE COUNTY INC: $10,500 · Human Services
Health$68,196Other$49,500Crime & Legal$10,500Human Services$10,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMOUNTAIN PROJECTS INC: $28,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWAKE COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC (DBA RIGHTCARE): $18,196 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPISGAH LEGAL SERVICES: $10,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOUNCIL ON AGING OF BUNCOMBE COUNTY INC: $10,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHIGH COUNTRY COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $10,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMOUNTAIN COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INC: $10,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWestern Carolina Medical Society Foundation Inc: $10,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCAREREACH INC: $10,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $10,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY HEALTH LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC: $8,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dogwood Health TrustThe Community Foundat…North Carolina Commun…The Duke EndowmentDirect ReliefFoundation for the Ca…Amazonsmile Foundation
Dogwood Health TrustNC19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dogwood Health Trust · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · North Carolina Community Health Center Assoc Inc · The Duke Endowment · Direct Relief · Foundation for the Carolinas · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Care Share Health Allianceinc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Care Share Health Allianceinc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Care Share Health Allianceinc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home