Skip to content

· Private foundation

Candy Cane Lane Charities

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$29k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,782
Median grant
4
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Legal Services Support$3,585
Almost Home$3,460
Tenth Life Cat Rescue$3,324
STL Youth Jobs$2,317
St Gabriels Capital Campaign$2,194
Gwendolyn Gifts$2,178
St Vincent de Paul$2,143
100 Neediest Cases$2,083
GNB1 Advocacy Group$1,782
Carneys Kids Foundaiton$1,086
Pedal The Cause$1,000
Individual grant recipient$992
ALS Foundation$851
American Lung Assn$851
St Joan of Arc$330
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Pedal The Cause: $1k → 11%Covenant House: $330 → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$33k · 7 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue -3% since the first grant, against -9% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
13

Total granted

$33k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
-9%

Still filing today

71%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’25
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyAnimalsHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $7k · revenue -15%
  • TL
    TENTH LIFE CAT RESCUE
    2× · 2023–2025 · $7k · revenue +11%
  • AH
    Almost Home
    2× · 2023–2025 · $7k · revenue -2%

Funded once

  • SL
    St Louis Youth Jobs
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • LS
    Legal Services of Missouri
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • NP
    NEEDY PAWS RESCUE
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of St Louis

To bring the healing, help, and hope of jesus christ to those in need with a compassionate, caring presence. our values are dignity, hospitality, service, excellence, compassion, and joy.

Human Services
2
Stray Rescue of St Louis

To rescue stray animals in need of medical attention, restore them to health, and place them in homes.

Animals
3
Sts Joachim and Ann Care Service

To provide integrated services such as financial assistance, case management, and referrals to families and individuals of all ages to reduce the propensity for homelessness, abuse and neglect, and to provide the tools to achieve…

—
4
Peter & Paul Community Services Inc

We walk with people facing homelessness on their journey to lifelong stability.

Housing & Shelter
5
Stray Paws Rescue

Our organization believes it is our moral responsibility to protect and improve the lives of rescued animals and place them in loving permanent homes in st. louis metro.

Animals
6
Humane Society of Southwest Missouri

The humane society of southwest missouri is one of the largest open admission, no kill shelters in southwest missouri. it is dedicated to helping sick, injured and abandoned dogs and cats find their forever homes. for over 60 years the…

Animals
7
Good Shepherd Children & Family Services

Connecting children with families and keeping families connected by providing pregnancy and parenting support, foster care programs and adoption services.

—
8
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
9
House Everyone Stl

Our Mission is to solve homelessness as we know it by establishing a pathway for our unhoused neighbors to a home with dignity.

Housing & Shelter
10
Greyhound Companions of Missouri

Rescue retired greyhounds and place in homes

—
11
Urban Harvest Stl

Urban Harvest STL builds community around inclusive and resilient local food systems.

Food & Nutrition
12
Loaves and Fishes for St Louis Inc

Loaves and fishes for st. louis, inc.'s mission is to provide uplifting and supportive services that empower our clients to become financially secure and have a stable home.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Patrick Center; the most unlike its peers is Pedal the Cause. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
3/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Almost Home: $6,767 · OtherAlmost HomeSt Louis Youth Jobs: $5,748 · OtherSt Louis Youth JobsLegal Services of Missouri: $4,652 · OtherLegal Services of MissouriLegal Services Support: $3,585 · OtherLegal Services SupportSt Joan of Arc: $2,897 · OtherSt Joan of ArcAmerican Lung Assn: $2,608 · OtherAmerican Lung AssnAmerican-Czech Educaitonal Ctr: $2,544 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,291 · OtherST LOUIS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $2,253 · OtherSt Gabriels Capital Campaign: $2,194 · OtherSt Vincent de Paul: $2,143 · OtherGNB1 Advocacy Group: $1,782 · OtherALS Assn: $1,757 · Other+7 more: $6,820 · Other+7 moreTENTH LIFE CAT RESCUE: $6,769 · Youth DevelopmentTENTH LIFE CAT RESCUECarneys Kids Foundation: $6,393 · Youth DevelopmentCarneys Kids Foundati…STL YOUTH JOBS: $2,317 · Youth DevelopmentSTL YOUTH JOBSUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $7,128 · PhilanthropyUNITED WA…NEEDY PAWS RESCUE: $3,078 · AnimalsBACK BAY MISSION: $2,396 · Housing & ShelterGWENDOLYN'S GIFTS: $2,178 · HealthOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC: $1,927 · Food & NutritionPEDAL THE CAUSE: $1,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE MISSOURI: $330 · Human Services
Other$48,041Youth Development$15,479Philanthropy$7,128Animals$3,078Housing & Shelter$2,396Health$2,178Food & Nutrition$1,927Human Services$1,330

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $7,128 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTENTH LIFE CAT RESCUE: $6,769 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetAlmost Home: $6,767 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCarneys Kids Foundation: $6,393 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetNEEDY PAWS RESCUE: $3,078 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBACK BAY MISSION: $2,396 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTL YOUTH JOBS: $2,317 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC: $1,927 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEDAL THE CAUSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST PATRICK CENTER: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE MISSOURI: $330 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds TENTH LIFE CAT RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds Almost Home ↗
  • Who funds Carneys Kids Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NEEDY PAWS RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds BACK BAY MISSION ↗
  • Who funds STL YOUTH JOBS ↗
  • Who funds GWENDOLYN'S GIFTS ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds PEDAL THE CAUSE ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds ST PATRICK CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE MISSOURI ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edward Jones FoundationMO12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edward Jones Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Candy Cane Lane Charities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Candy Cane Lane Charities. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Candy Cane Lane Charities?

    Find your warmest path to Candy Cane Lane Charities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Candy Cane Lane Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph