Skip to content

Ohio · Public charity

Campus Partners for Community Urban Redevelopment

Revitalization of the area immediately adjacent to the ohio state university's main campus in columbus, ohio.

$125k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
2
Itemized grants FY2025
4
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$122k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$100,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$100,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 5
FY2017 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$286M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations Campus Partners for Community Urban Redevelopment funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’23’24
Community ImprovementArts & CultureEducationEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving2$122k0%
FY20244$165k0%
FY20235$578k40%
FY20215$537k80%
FY20201$177k0%
FY20191$236k0%
FY20183$515k67%
FY20174$696kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$2.3MCommunity Improvement$316kEducation$190kRecreation & Sports$168kPhilanthropy$150kHousing & Shelter$75k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Gateway Film Foundation$1,851,318718%
Zora's House Inc$400,00027%
University Development Strategies$246,667118%
Metro Early College High School$150,00011%
Mid Ohio Regional Planning Commission$75,0001n/a
Neighborhood Design Center$69,20033%
Paul Werth & Associates$54,7981n/a
Central Ohio Community Improvement$50,00011%
The Ohio State University$40,0001n/a
Weinland Park Community Civic$39,3774n/a
Show all 12 grantees
All grantees of Campus Partners for Community Urban Redevelopment by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Gateway Film Foundation$1,851,318718%
Zora's House Inc$400,00027%
University Development Strategies$246,667118%
Metro Early College High School$150,00011%
Mid Ohio Regional Planning Commission$75,0001n/a
Neighborhood Design Center$69,20033%
Paul Werth & Associates$54,7981n/a
Central Ohio Community Improvement$50,00011%
The Ohio State University$40,0001n/a
Weinland Park Community Civic$39,3774n/a
University District Organization Inc$27,13723%
Godman Guild Association$23,50011%

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Campus Partners for Community Urban Redevelopment supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGateway Film Foundation: $1,851,318 over 7y, 18% of budgetZora's House Inc: $400,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetUniversity Development Strategies: $246,667 over 1y, 18% of budgetMetro Early College High School: $150,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNeighborhood Design Center: $69,200 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetCentral Ohio Community Improvement: $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetUniversity District Organization Inc: $27,137 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetGodman Guild Association: $23,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationOH18.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · United Way of Central Ohio Inc · American Electric Power Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Campus Partners for Community Urban Redevelopment with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Campus Partners for Community Urban Redevelopment?

Find your warmest path to Campus Partners for Community Urban Redevelopment through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Campus Partners for Community Urban Redevelopment

How much does Campus Partners for Community Urban Redevelopment give?
Campus Partners for Community Urban Redevelopment reported 2 itemized grants totaling $121,757, out of $125,025 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 5 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2024.
What does Campus Partners for Community Urban Redevelopment fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (72%), Community Improvement (10%), Education (6%).
Who are Campus Partners for Community Urban Redevelopment's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Gateway Film Foundation ($1.9M), Zora's House Inc ($400k), University Development Strategies ($247k).
Does Campus Partners for Community Urban Redevelopment fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Campus Partners for Community Urban Redevelopment?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Columbus Foundation, United Way of Central Ohio Inc, American Electric Power Foundation.
Where is Campus Partners for Community Urban Redevelopment based?
Campus Partners for Community Urban Redevelopment is based in OH.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Campus Partners for Community Urban Redevelopment’s filings →

More from the funding graph