Skip to content
Camden-Clark Memorial Hospital Corporation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Camden-Clark Memorial Hospital Corporation

The mission of Camden-Clark Memorial Hospital is to meet the health care needs of our community for a lifetime.

$230k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$246kCommunity Improvement$127kEducation$120kArts & Culture$100kYouth Development$84kEmployment$38kPhilanthropy$29kRecreation & Sports$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $141,268, the rows itemized in this filing. The $229,543 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $88,275 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $113k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$279M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
West Virginia University Foundation Inc$16,000
Wood County Junior Livestock Committee Inc - 4H & FFA Summer Showcase$15,100
Wood County Society Inc$15,000
Parkersburg Art Center Inc$15,000
Ritchie Co Youth Livestock Association$11,800
Appalachian Partnership Inc$10,000
Washington State Community College Foundation$10,000
West Virginia University Parkersburg$10,000
Childrens Museum of the MOV Inc$10,000
Downtown PKB Inc$8,750
Galley Enterprises Inc$7,500
Wirt County Fair Association$6,618
American Cancer Society$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%American Red Cross: $5k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$521k · 18 repeat orgs$254k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
11

Total granted

$521k
$224k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+8%

Still filing today

72%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2019–2024 · $75k · revenue +8%
  • WC
    Wood County Society Inc
    3× · 2021–2024 · $35k · revenue +1%
  • CO
    Chamber of Commerce of the MOV
    3× · 2018–2021 · $34k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • SR
    SUMMERSVILLE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $147k · revenue -66%
  • SO
    Southeastern Ohio Port Authority
    one grant, 2023 · $18k
  • PW
    PARKERSBURG WOOD COUNTY AREA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +145%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Belmont Professional Associates Inc

To improve the communitys health through the efficient provision, coordination, and integration of quality health services, health education, and research. To provide compassionate, quality health services according to the spiritual,…

—
2
West Virginia State University Research & Development Corporation

To foster, support, and assist in any research and economic development activities consistent with the educational objectives and mission of west virginia state university.

—
3
West Virginia Chamber of Commerce

The west virginia chamber of commerce provides opportunities for broad based prosperity throughout west virginia.

—
4
Ohio Chamber of Commerce

As the state's leading business advocate and resource, the ohio chamber of commerce aggressively champions free enterprise, economic competitiveness and growth for the benefit of all ohioans.

—
5
Huntington Regional Chamber of Commerce Inc

The huntington regional chamber of commerce will be the business advocate and actively facilitate the development and promotion of an attractive business climate and workforce in cabell and wayne counties.

—
6
The County Chamber of Commerce

The business council of westchester's mission is to work hard to grow the economy, create jobs and build a strong business community in westchester county.

—
7
Mountaineer Community Health Center

To provide primary medical care service in a rural community.

Health
8
Community Care of West Virginia Inc

The mission of ccwv is to help our communities live the healthiest lives possible by meeting their immediate and long-term healthcare needs. this mission is accomplished by providing high quality, accessible, comprehensive, culturally…

—
9
Conference of Western Wayne

All of the expenses of the cww are for the purpose of improving local government and administration through cooperative efforts. all services are provided to various communities in western wayne county, michigan.

Community Improvement
10
Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce

The chamber is a member association designed to be the leading advocate for the business community of the greater dayton region. its mission is to work shoulder to shoulder with businesses to help them succeed.

—
11
Jobsohio

To promote economic development, job creation, job retention, job training, workforce development, and the retention of current and recruitment of new business to ohio.

Employment
12
West Virginia University Innovation Corporation

To offer a wide range of strategic partnerships, academia, employment and community opportunities to the state, while promoting innovation and critical thinking within our workforce. Our vision is to catalyze economic growth and improve…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Parkersburg Area Community Foundation Inc (Previously Pacf Inc); the most unlike its peers is Belpre Area Multi-Use Trail Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/25
Grantees still filing
13/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SUMMERSVILLE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $146,500 · OtherSUMMERSVILLE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERGalley Enterprises Inc: $37,500 · OtherGalley Enterprises IncChamber of Commerce of the MOV: $34,000 · OtherChamber of Commerce of the MOVRitchie Co Youth Livestock Association: $20,150 · OtherRitchie Co Youth Livestock AssociationSoutheastern Ohio Port Authority: $18,000 · OtherWood County Development Authority: $17,000 · OtherOhio University: $14,506 · Other+9 more: $77,238 · Other+9 moreCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE MOV INC: $69,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S MUS…Parkersburg Art Center Inc: $31,267 · Arts & CultureParkersburg Ar…Wood County Society Inc: $35,000 · HealthWood County S…American Heart Association Inc: $30,000 · HealthAmerican Hear…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $16,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANC…Community Health Association: $10,000 · HealthCommunity Hea…WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $75,264 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA…WASHINGTON STATE COLLEGE OF OHIO FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationWASHINGTON ST…Marietta College: $5,000 · EducationMarietta Coll…WOOD COUNTY JUNIOR LIVESTOCK COMMITTEE INC: $49,299 · Youth DevelopmentWOOD COUN…BUCKSKIN COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentBUCKSKIN …BOYS CLUB OF PARKERSBURG INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS CLUB…DOWNTOWN PKB INC: $25,700 · Community ImprovementAPPALACHIAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementBELPRE AREA MULTI-USE TRAIL PROJECT: $5,000 · Community ImprovementUNITED WAY ALLIANCE OF THE MID-OHIO VALLEY INC: $22,500 · PhilanthropyPARKERSBURG AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC (PREVIOUSLY PACF INC): $6,000 · Philanthropy
Other$364,894Arts & Culture$100,267Health$91,500Education$90,264Youth Development$64,299Community Improvement$40,700Philanthropy$28,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSUMMERSVILLE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $146,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $75,264 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE MOV INC: $69,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetWOOD COUNTY JUNIOR LIVESTOCK COMMITTEE INC: $49,299 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetWood County Society Inc: $35,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetChamber of Commerce of the MOV: $34,000 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetParkersburg Art Center Inc: $31,267 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN PKB INC: $25,700 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetUNITED WAY ALLIANCE OF THE MID-OHIO VALLEY INC: $22,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $16,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMarietta Area Chamber of Commerce: $11,072 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetPARKERSBURG WOOD COUNTY AREA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $11,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBUCKSKIN COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWASHINGTON STATE COLLEGE OF OHIO FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCommunity Health Association: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HOPE RECOVERY MANOR INC: $7,500 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetPARKERSBURG AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC (PREVIOUSLY PACF INC): $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOHIO COUNTY INDEPENDENT BARLOW IN: $5,647 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetBELPRE AREA MULTI-USE TRAIL PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetBOYS CLUB OF PARKERSBURG INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE FAMILY CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER OF REGION V INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMarietta College: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Parkersburg Area Comm…Peoples Bank Foundati…Sisters of St Joseph …Marietta Community Fo…Bernard McDonough Fou…The Virginia L Neptun…Spartan FoundationDeitzler Foundation I…Amazonsmile Foundation
Parkersburg Area Community Foundation Inc (Previously Pacf Inc)WV24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Parkersburg Area Community Foundation Inc (Previously Pacf Inc) · Peoples Bank Foundation · Sisters of St Joseph Charitable Fund Inc · Marietta Community Foundation Inc · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · The Virginia L Neptune Charitable Foundation · Spartan Foundation · Deitzler Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Camden-Clark Memorial Hospital Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Camden-Clark Memorial Hospital Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Camden-Clark Memorial Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home