· Public charity
California Consortium for Urban Indian Health Inc
The mission of ccuih is to facilitate shared development resources for our members and to raise public awareness in order to support a health and wellness network that meets the needs of american indians living in urban communities in california.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $118,600 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $145,623 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $27,023 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $113k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Friendship House Association | $30,000 |
| United American Indian Involv | $30,000 |
| Fresno American Indian Health | $20,000 |
| Native American Health Center | $20,000 |
| California Pan-Ethnic Health | $12,600 |
| Indian Health Ctr Santa Clara | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $113k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FHFriendship House Association of American Indians Inc4× · 2019–2022 · $143k · revenue +113%
- NDNATIVE DIRECTIONS INC3× · 2019–2021 · $133k · revenue +270%
- FAFRESNO AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH PROJECT4× · 2019–2022 · $133k · revenue +204%
Funded once
- SNSACRAMENTO NATIVE AMERICAN HEALTH CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $28k · revenue +72%
- PAPeggy and Jack Baskin Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue ×14
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To elevate the health status of the American Indian people in our service area and all people in our communities to the highest level possible through a comprehensive system of preventive and therapeutic services.
To provide health services to eligible american indians in the service areas of Glenn and Yolo counties and portions of Colusa, Butte and Tehama counties. Medical and dental services are provided to the general community as well.
To promote and provide quality services to improve the health and well-being of American Indians/Alaska Natives and other community members.
The mission of ccuih is to facilitate shared development resources for our members and to raise public awareness in order to support a health and wellness network that meets the needs of american indians living in urban communities in…
Southern Indian Health Council is a Native American organization committed to protecting and improving the physical, mental, and spiritual health of our American Indian Community. We provide a comprehensive range of wellness, health care,…
To provide complete medical and dental care to Native Americans in the area of Lake County, California.
Integrate community-based traditional knowledge into all facets of Native health care and education and to promote wellness and balance for Indigenous peoples.
Mact health board provides medical outpatient, dental, and behavioral health services to native americans and other communities of alpine, mariposa, amador, calaveras, and tuolumne counties.
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.
Provides comprehensive health care and ancillary services to the native-american population of sierra, placer, and nevada counties of california.
The organization provides health care and other related services to medically underserved populations in Los Angeles County.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indian Health Center of Santa Clara Valley and the most unlike its peers is Peggy and Jack Baskin Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Friendship House Association of American Indians Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIVE DIRECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds FRESNO AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH PROJECT ↗
- Who funds UNITED AMERICAN INDIAN INVOLVEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds Native American Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Bakersfield American Indian Health Project Inc ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds SACRAMENTO NATIVE AMERICAN HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds California Pan-Ethnic Health Network ↗
- Who funds INDIAN HEALTH CENTER OF SANTA CLARA VALLEY ↗
- Who funds Peggy and Jack Baskin Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Council of Urban Indian Health · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Direct Relief · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · California Healthcare Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization California Consortium for Urban Indian Health Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.