Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Caliber Collision Centers Foundation

To provide assistance to 1) military & veterans, 2) victims of disasters and emergency hardship situations, 3) food banks and 4) other public charities.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
42
Grants FY2024still arriving
19
States reached
$69k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Food & Nutrition$2.7MHealth$361kPublic Safety & Disaster$70kHuman Services$65kPhilanthropy$55kRecreation & Sports$37kPublic Benefit$30kCrime & Legal$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 42 grants below total $718,539 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,712,176 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $993,637 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $116k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $418k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $185k
$12,500
Median grant
19
States reached
$114k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK$69,139
NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK$65,664
AMERICAN RED CROSS NORTH TEXAS REGION$50,000
CARE AND SHARE$35,210
PLACER FOOD BANK$34,870
UTAH FOOD BANK$34,457
CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK$31,487
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY$25,000
ONE TRIBE FOUNDATION$25,000
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$24,328
FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES$21,346
ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$18,963
RETURNING VETERANS PROJECT$16,010
MERGING VETS AND PLAYERS$15,000
FEEDING AMERICA RIVERSIDE & SAN BERNARDINO$13,974
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $157k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%1-800 CHARITY CARS: $56k → 11%INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $13k → 8%INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $12k → 8%INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $7k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS NORTH TEXAS REGION: $50k → 14%INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $6k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $13k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.0M · 47 repeat orgs$436k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

47 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
19

Total granted

$3.0M
$243k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+6%

Still filing today

98%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $194k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyPublic BenefitAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    Tarrant Area Food Bank
    7× · 2017–2024 · $439k · revenue +144%
  • NT
    NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
    7× · 2017–2024 · $432k · revenue +105%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    3× · 2017–2021 · $361k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHARITY CARS INC AKA 1-800-CHARITY CARS FREE CHARITY CARS
    2× · 2018–2021 · $56k · revenue -66%
  • HC
    HOPE CENTER INDY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $33k
  • CT
    CARRY THE LOAD
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue -4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
2
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
3
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
4
Food Bank of the Albemarle

To fight hunger and poverty in northeastern north carolina.

Food & Nutrition
5
Feeding America

Our mission is to advance change in America by ensuring equitable access to nutritious food for all in partnership with partner food banks, policymakers, supporters, and the communities we serve.

Food & Nutrition
6
Food Bank of Eastern Michigan

The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…

Food & Nutrition
7
The Food Depot

The food depot fosters healthy communities by engaging a network of partners and developing solutions to create a hunger-free new mexico.

Human Services
8
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
9
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
10
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
11
Arkansas Foodbank

None

Food & Nutrition
12
Community Food Bank of New Jersey Inc

We serve as a champion for addressing the root causes of hunger, delivering neighbor-centric solutions, and fostering collaborative partnerships across all sectors of society for New Jersey.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fredericksburg Regional Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is One Tribe Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyMilitary Veterans SupportCommunity FoundationsYouth Sports ProgramsVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Food Banks and Pantries
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%12%20–35yr13%62%35–55yr16%6%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%6%20–35yr13%68%35–55yr16%15%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/77
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,488

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
72/73
Grantees still filing
55/73
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Tarrant Area Food Bank — $438,990 · OtherTarrant Area Food BankNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $431,981 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $123,520 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANKThe Houston Food Bank — $96,397 · OtherThe Houston Food BankUTAH FOOD BANK — $71,713 · Other+17 more — $255,552 · Other+17 moreFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $177,279 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIESFEEDING AMERICA RIVERSIDE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES — $106,764 · Food & NutritionFEEDING AMERICA RIVERSIDE SAN BERNARDINO COU…Care and Share Inc — $103,854 · Food & NutritionCare and Share IncFEEDING THE FOOTHILLS — $83,162 · Food & NutritionFEEDING THE FOOTHILLSCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $79,854 · Food & NutritionCentral Texas Food Bank IncSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $74,846 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEYCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $68,829 · Food & NutritionEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER — $67,418 · Food & NutritionATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $63,056 · Food & Nutrition+36 more — $516,871 · Food & Nutrition+36 moreAmerican Heart Association Inc — $361,282 · HealthAmerican Hea…Walter's Children's Charities Classic — $22,390 · HealthWalter's Chi…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $62,500 · Human ServicesCHARITY CARS INC AKA 1-800-CHARITY CARS FREE CHARITY CARS — $56,150 · Human ServicesINTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE — $38,022 · Human ServicesRETURNING VETERANS PROJECT — $29,920 · Public BenefitMERGING VETS AND PLAYERS — $15,000 · Public BenefitCARRY THE LOAD — $30,275 · PhilanthropySECOND HARVEST OF THE GREATER VALLEY — $8,688 · PhilanthropyCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC — $25,000 · Civil Rights
Other$1,418,153Food & Nutrition$1,341,933Health$383,672Human Services$156,672Public Benefit$44,920Philanthropy$38,963Civil Rights$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTarrant Area Food Bank — $438,990 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $431,981 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $361,282 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $177,279 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $123,520 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA RIVERSIDE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES — $106,764 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCare and Share Inc — $103,854 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $96,397 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING THE FOOTHILLS — $83,162 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $79,854 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $74,846 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK — $71,713 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $68,829 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER — $67,418 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $63,056 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $62,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITY CARS INC AKA 1-800-CHARITY CARS FREE CHARITY CARS — $56,150 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetINTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE — $38,022 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $37,958 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSecond Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc — $35,573 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE — $33,452 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCARRY THE LOAD — $30,275 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRETURNING VETERANS PROJECT — $29,920 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC — $23,880 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK — $22,786 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWalter's Children's Charities Classic — $22,390 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC — $21,909 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SAN DIEGO — $20,767 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK — $20,375 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD SHARE INC — $20,289 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC — $18,859 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC — $18,765 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN ECUMENICAL MINISTRY INC — $17,962 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetFOOD GROUP MINNESOTA INC THE — $17,101 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC — $16,615 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK — $16,549 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC — $16,274 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $15,474 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMERGING VETS AND PLAYERS — $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFEED MORE INC — $13,966 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK COALITION OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY — $13,598 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF IOWA — $13,483 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHREE SQUARE — $13,299 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAYETTEVILLE URBAN MINISTRY INC — $12,943 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA — $12,785 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO — $12,709 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $12,667 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Holdings F…Feeding AmericaCarmax FoundationThe Albertsons Compan…Charities Aid Foundat…Calfoods LogisticsFarmlink ProjectCalifornia Foundation…The Gap FoundationKaiser Foundation Hos…The Blackbaud Giving …Sempra Foundation
Enterprise Holdings FoundationMO22.3× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Feeding America · Carmax Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Calfoods Logistics · Farmlink Project · California Foundation for Stronger Communities · The Gap Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Sempra Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Caliber Collision Centers Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Food Bank of Delaware Inc — 26% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Regional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
40report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Caliber Collision Centers Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Caliber Collision Centers Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home