Skip to content
Plinth

· Community foundation

Caldwell County Community Services Foundation

In 2024, CCCSF awarded 10 grants totalling $116,150, three 2-day grant writing workshops were conducted servicing non-profit in Caldwell.

$116k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

Food & Nutrition$115kYouth Development$60kEducation$59kAnimals$40kHuman Services$40kArts & Culture$30kReligion$18kHealth$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $95k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$24k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATALYST COLLECTIVE STRATEGIC NONPROFIT COUNSELING$25,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS S CENTR TX$20,000
RESURRECTION LIFE CHURCH$20,000
METHODIST HEALTHCARE MINISTRIES$10,000
CONNECTIONS IND AND FAMILY S$10,000
WHERE WE THRIVE$10,000
MARTIN MEMORIAL CHURCH OF GOD$8,150
COMBINED COMMUNITY ACTION$8,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COMBINED COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $8k → 12%COMBINED COMMUNITY ACTION: $8k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$118k · 6 repeat orgs$276k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
20

Total granted

$118k
$215k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+4%

Still filing today

33%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
AnimalsEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RL
    RESURRECTION LIFE CHURCH
    2× · 2023–2024 · $30k
  • GA
    Golden Age Home
    2× · 2022–2023 · $25k · revenue -4%
  • WW
    WHERE WE THRIVE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $18k

Funded once

  • CC
    CALDWELL COUNTY CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $22k · revenue -86%
  • MC
    MCMAHAN COMMUNITY WOMENS CLUB
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • CO
    CHURCH OF THE ANNUNCIATION 301 S WALNUT
    one grant, 2022 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
River Run Ranch and Animal Rescue

Animal Rescue

Animals
2
Twiggs County Animal Rescue

Save animals in a county with no animal services

Animals
3
Throw a Dog a Bone Dog Rescue

Throw a Dog a Bone is an all-breed dog rescue located in Austin, TX. We focus on saving dogs primarily in the rural shelters in South Texas. Many of these shelters have no exposure and very few resources. Our mission is to rescue as many…

Animals
4
Sunnyside Street Dogs I

Community dog rescue focused on saving and rehoming street dogs in Houston.

Animals
5
Love and Puppy Paws Dog Rescue

Love And Puppy Paws Dog Rescue (LAPP Dog Rescue) was formed to help alleviate the stress of city and county animal control facilities around South and Central Texas. We accept dogs into our rescue that are in overpopulated animal control…

Animals
6
Animal Allies of Texas Inc

Provide quality of life for pets owners in our area

Animals
7
Allies Haven Animal Rescue

Saving unwanted, abandoned, abused and neglected dogs in Texas. Also to promote proper pet ownership, community educational programs and to support spaying/neutering as a means to control unwanted pets. We provide complete vetting prior to…

Animals
8
Texas Best Choices Animal Rescue

Rescue and care for unwanted dogs

Animals
9
Angies Dog House

We are dedicated to rescuig animals left homeless for whatever reason, animals in public shelters where they are at high risk of euthanasia, animals given up by their owners because of difficult circumstances, and those in danger of abuse…

Animals
10
West Houston Animal Rescue

Rescue dogs and other small domestic animals, care for them until they are healthy and adopt them to loving families.

Animals
11
Heart of Texas Spca

Animal Welfare

Animals
12
Second Chance Dog Rescue

Our mission at Second Chance Dog Rescue is to care for companion animals in need byoffering safe refuge, providing medical care (including sterilization) and facilitating adoptions.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action Inc of Central Texas and the most unlike its peers is Education Foundation for Lockhart Isd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%24%<5yr15%10%5–10yr20%24%10–20yr15%19%20–35yr9%19%35–55yr15%5%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%15%<5yr15%9%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr15%22%20–35yr9%27%35–55yr15%6%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 24% of your grantees by number, and just 15% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 6% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
6%
2/31
the rest of the field
13%
29/219

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
7/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RESURRECTION LIFE CHURCH — $30,000 · OtherRESURRECTION LIFE CHURCHGolden Age Home — $25,000 · OtherGolden Age HomeCatalyst Teen Center Corp — $25,000 · OtherCatalyst Teen Center CorpBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN MARCOS — $20,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN MARCOSWHERE WE THRIVE INC — $17,500 · OtherWHERE WE THRIVE INCMCMAHAN COMMUNITY WOMENS CLUB — $15,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE ANNUNCIATION 301 S WALNUT — $15,000 · OtherTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN — $15,000 · OtherMETHODIST HEALTHCARE MINISTRIES — $15,000 · OtherCONNECTIONS IND AND FAMILY S — $15,000 · OtherREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL OF LOCKHART — $14,228 · OtherLULING ISD HS STUDENT COUNCIL — $12,500 · OtherTHE EYES OF THE SAN MARCOS RIVER — $12,000 · OtherLULING AREA OIL MUSEUM INC — $12,000 · Other+7 more — $49,669 · Other+7 moreTAKE ME HOME ADVOCATES FOR TRANSPORT — $15,000 · AnimalsTAKE ME HOM…Ghetto Rescue FFoundation — $15,000 · AnimalsGhetto Resc…CALDWELL COUNTY ANIMAL COALITION — $10,000 · AnimalsCALDWELL CO…CALDWELL COUNTY CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION — $22,000 · Food & NutritionEducation Foundation for Lockhart ISD — $10,000 · EducationMARTINDALE COMMUNITY LIBRARY — $7,216 · EducationCOMBINED COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $8,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION INC OF CENTRAL TEXAS — $8,000 · Human ServicesGASLIGHT-BAKER THEATRE — $5,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$292,897Animals$40,000Food & Nutrition$22,000Education$17,216Human Services$16,000Arts & Culture$5,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGolden Age Home — $25,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCatalyst Teen Center Corp — $25,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetCALDWELL COUNTY CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION — $22,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN MARCOS — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTAKE ME HOME ADVOCATES FOR TRANSPORT — $15,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGhetto Rescue FFoundation — $15,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetLULING AREA OIL MUSEUM INC — $12,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetEducation Foundation for Lockhart ISD — $10,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetCOMBINED COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION INC OF CENTRAL TEXAS — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARTINDALE COMMUNITY LIBRARY — $7,216 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetGASLIGHT-BAKER THEATRE — $5,500 over 1y, 3.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St David's FoundationTX19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St David's Foundation · United Way for Greater Austin · Austin Community Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Caldwell County Community Services Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Caldwell County Community Services Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Caldwell County Community Services Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph