Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cakora Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$92kHuman Services$74kYouth Development$37kPhilanthropy$33kRecreation & Sports$22kEducation$21kCrime & Legal$11kHealth$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$388k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$7,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
MILLER SENIOR CENTER$4,000
SALVATION ARMY$3,000
PEKIN UNION MISSION$2,500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PEKIN$2,500
ADULT AND TEEN CHALLENGE$2,000
PEKIN PARK FOUNDATION$2,000
TAZEWELL COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER$2,000
CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF ABUSE$1,500
TAZEWELL COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY$1,000
GRACE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$1,000
PEKIN OUTREACH CENTER$1,000
PEKIN MAIN STREET$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TAZEWELL COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER: $4k → 9%PEORIA RESCUE MINISTRIES: $500 → 14%TAZEWELL COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER: $4k → 9%PEORIA RESCUE MINISTRIES: $500 → 14%TAZEWELL COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER: $4k → 9%PEORIA RESCUE MINISTRIES: $250 → 14%TAZEWELL COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 9%TAZEWELL COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 9%TAZEWELL COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 9%TAZEWELL COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$403k · 33 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
4

Total granted

$403k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%
+21%

Still filing today

24%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsAnimalsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TAZEWELL COUNTY RESOURCE CENTERS INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +98%
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF ABUSE
    7× · 2017–2025 · $17k · revenue +39%
  • PM
    PATHWAY MINISTRIES
    3× · 2017–2019 · $1k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • TC
    TAZEWELL CTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CT
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • NH
    NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +21%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Pekin

The mission of both the national united way and the united way of pekin is to increase the organized capacity of people to care for one another.

Philanthropy
2
Tazwood Community Services Inc

Community action agency dedicated to providing resources, guidance, and assistance to individuals and families navigating their way through economic hardships

Human Services
3
Illinois Presbyterian Home

Operate homes for the aged and to conduct charitable and benevolent enterprises

Human Services
4
Piven Theatre Workshop

The mission of piven theatre workshop as it has evolved over 46 years is to pursue the three branches of the organization: the training center for children, training centers for adults, and mentorship that annually serves 1,000 students…

Arts & Culture
5
Felines Inc

Providing a safe and loving shelter to cats and dogs until their permanent adoptive home is found.

Animals
6
Prairie Pines

Own and operate assisted living facility

Housing & Shelter
7
Peytons Place Inc

To feed and provide vet care for animals in need.

—
8
Peoria Historical Society

Preserve the history of central illinos and to promote this history through education

—
9
Tecumseh Area Partnership Inc

Employment and training services

Employment
10
The Peoria Area Chamber of Commerce

The peoria area chamber of commerce is a membership organization of businesses, delivering value to its members by 1) cultivating a thriving business community, 2) presenting the united voice of local business to government, 3) offering…

—
11
Peacham Library Inc

Provides Public Library and information services to the Peacham community.

—
12
Pender Adult Services Inc

Operates a care center and provides services to the elderly including home delivered meals, congregate meals, companion services, personal care, patient medical aid, and group activities.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tazewell County Resource Centers Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pekin Main Street Co Ron Harlan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $62,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $36,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNITED WAY: $30,000 · OtherUNITED WAYIndividual grant recipient: $21,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPEKIN UNION MISSION: $20,500 · OtherPEKIN UNION MISSIONGRACE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $18,500 · OtherGRACE UNITED METHODIST CHURCHTHE CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF ABUSE: $16,500 · OtherMILLER SENIOR CENTER: $16,000 · OtherL VESELY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $15,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $15,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PEKIN: $14,500 · OtherADULT AND TEEN CHALLENGE: $13,000 · Other+18 more: $67,550 · Other+18 morePEKIN PARK FOUNDATION: $24,000 · Recreation & SportsTAZEWELL COUNTY RESOURCE CENTERS INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesPATHWAY MINISTRIES: $1,250 · Human ServicesPEKIN MAIN STREET CO RON HARLAN: $7,000 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $2,000 · Community ImprovementTAZEWELL ANIMAL PROTECTIVE SOCIETY: $5,000 · AnimalsILLINOIS POLICY INSTITUTE: $4,500 · Public Benefit
Other$345,550Recreation & Sports$24,000Human Services$21,250Community Improvement$9,000Animals$5,000Public Benefit$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEKIN PARK FOUNDATION: $24,000 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetTAZEWELL COUNTY RESOURCE CENTERS INC: $20,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF ABUSE: $16,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PEKIN: $14,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetWD BOYCE COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTAZEWELL ANIMAL PROTECTIVE SOCIETY: $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetILLINOIS POLICY INSTITUTE: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPATHWAY MINISTRIES: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PEKIN PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TAZEWELL COUNTY RESOURCE CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF ABUSE ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PEKIN ↗
  • Who funds PEKIN MAIN STREET CO RON HARLAN ↗
  • Who funds WD BOYCE COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds TAZEWELL ANIMAL PROTECTIVE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS POLICY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PATHWAY MINISTRIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gilmore FoundationIL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gilmore Foundation · United Way of Pekin · Peoria Area Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cakora Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cakora Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cakora Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph