· Private foundation
C Q Yee Hop Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k14 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Iolani School | $10,000 |
| Honolulu Civil Beat | $5,000 |
| United Chinese Society | $5,000 |
| Kona Historical Society | $3,500 |
| Chinatown Improvement District | $3,200 |
| Palolo Chinese Home | $3,000 |
| Chinese Chamber of Commerce Foundtn | $2,500 |
| Hawaii Food Bank | $2,500 |
| Mun Lun School | $2,500 |
| Palehua Conservation Initiative | $2,000 |
| A Better Chinatown Association | $1,500 |
| Chinatown 808 Events | $1,500 |
| Bamboo Ridge Press | $1,000 |
| Hamakua Youth Center | $1,000 |
| Hawaii Chinese History Center | $200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 72% of C Q Yee Hop Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in HI; read by stated purpose it is 28% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against -15% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- 'S'IOLANI SCHOOL4× · 2022–2025 · $46k · revenue +16%
- HCHonolulu Civil Beat Inc4× · 2022–2025 · $19k · revenue +6%
- UCUNITED CHINESE SOCIETY OF HAWAII THE CHUN WA HUI QUON2× · 2024–2025 · $14k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- KHKA HALE A KE OLA HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTERS INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue +196%
- LPLANAKILA PACIFIC FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -15%
- TAThe ARTS at Marks Garageone grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -60%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
In 1972, kumu hula george lanakilakekiahiali`i na`ope and kahu wendell silva created our organization to preserve hawaiian culture through dance. from that idea they formed the kalihi-palama culture & arts society, inc. (kpcas) to provide…
to rehabilitate, curate, and steward the natural and cultural resources of Kawa to honor the past, benefit the present, and preserve for the future generations of Ka'u, the Island of Hawaii and all humankind.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Chinese Society of Hawaii the Chun Wa Hui Quon and the most unlike its peers is The Arts at Marks Garage. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds 'IOLANI SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Honolulu Civil Beat Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED CHINESE SOCIETY OF HAWAII THE CHUN WA HUI QUON ↗
- Who funds PALOLO CHINESE HOME ↗
- Who funds CHINESE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HAWAII FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds CHINATOWN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds A BETTER CHINATOWN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SUI WAH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED CHINESE UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KONA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds KA HALE A KE OLA HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds WEED & SEED HAWAII INC ↗
- Who funds LANAKILA PACIFIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The ARTS at Marks Garage ↗
- Who funds PALEHUA CONSERVATION INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds BAMBOO RIDGE PRESS ↗
- Who funds CHINATOWN 808 EVENTS ↗
- Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Tradewind Group Foundation · Louise & Yt Lum Foundation · Locations Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization C Q Yee Hop Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to C Q Yee Hop Foundation?
Find your warmest path to C Q Yee Hop Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.