· Private foundation
Locations Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k28 grants · $95k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $96k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OTHER DONATIONS (LESS THAN 1000) | $15,847 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS | $14,929 |
| FAMILY PROGRAMS HAWAII | $12,108 |
| KIDS HURT TOO HAWAII | $11,994 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HAWAII | $11,083 |
| HAWAIIAN HOPE ORG | $10,000 |
| ALOHA UNITED WAY | $10,000 |
| HAWAII 3R'S | $10,000 |
| SWISH HONOLULU | $6,832 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS HAWAII | $6,127 |
| INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN SERVICES | $6,019 |
| HUGS | $6,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $5,335 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $5,019 |
| THE SHELTER | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $232k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against -15% for the ones you funded once.
73 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 42 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HHHAWAIIAN HOPE ORG8× · 2017–2024 · $84k · revenue +468% · 32% of their budget
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HAWAII7× · 2017–2024 · $74k · revenue +30%
- MFMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF HAWAII7× · 2017–2024 · $66k · revenue +9%
Funded once
- D(DONATIONS (LESS THSN (1000)one grant, 2018 · $33k
- KEKIPAPA ELEMENTARY SCHOOLone grant, 2018 · $25k
- RARED APPLE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To improve the health and well-being of our community.
The kuki'o ho'omana fund seeks to uplift and enrich our hawai'i island community through intentional investments in curated local organizations focusing on youth empowerment, affordable housing, environmental preservation, cultural…
To improve the lives of those we touch by offering support, guidance and compassionate care of body, mind and spirit.
Palliative care is a win-win-win-win. expanding access to palliative care benefits all parts of the healthcare system. people living with serious illness are better able to manage physical and emotional symptoms and have peace of mind that…
To provide high quality medical and social services that are affordable and accessible for everyone regardless of ability to pay.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partners in Development Foundation and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 125 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HAWAIIAN HOPE ORG ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HAWAII ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF HAWAII ↗
- Who funds HAWAII 3RS ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROGRAMS HAWAII ↗
- Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS HAWAII INC ↗
- Who funds IHS THE INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds Women in Need ↗
- Who funds AFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS HAWAII ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds WEED & SEED HAWAII INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OAHU ↗
- Who funds HAWAII FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds ALOHA UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HomeAid Hawaii ↗
- Who funds KIDS HURT TOO HAWAII ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN'S JUSTICE CENTER OF OAHU ↗
- Who funds NA KAMA KAI ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS HAWAII ↗
- Who funds HAWAIIAN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Surfers Healing Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION OF HAWAII ↗
- Who funds THE AUTISM SOCIETY OF HAWAII ↗
- Who funds ACHIEVE ZERO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Aloha United Way Inc · J Watumull Fund · Tradewind Group Foundation · Bank of Hawaii Charitable Fdn · First Insurance Company of Hawaii Charitable Foundation · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Atherton Family Foundation · Central Pacific Bank Foundation · First Hawaiian Bank Foundation · The Queen's Medical Center · Finance Factors Foundation · Aloha Harvest
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Locations Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Locations Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Locations Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.