· Private foundation
C & N Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k25 grants · $84k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $150k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $66k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FIDELITY CHARITABLE | $66,000 |
| HILLSDALE COLLEGE | $25,000 |
| GRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL | $25,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE TETON RIVER | $20,000 |
| DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $15,000 |
| OUR LADY QUEEN OF MARTYRS SCHOOL | $15,000 |
| KIRK IN THE HILLS | $10,000 |
| GRAND TETON PARK FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| TUNNEL TO TOWERS | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| CLIMB WYOMING | $10,000 |
| DETROIT PUBLIC TELEVISION | $5,000 |
| THE CHRISTIAN BROTHERS FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| ST JOHN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $5,000 |
| TETON RAPTOR CENTER | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.
49 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SJSt John's Health Foundation5× · 2017–2021 · $200k · revenue +482%
- CDCLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING9× · 2017–2025 · $53k · revenue +49%
GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION6× · 2017–2022 · $50k · revenue +113%
Funded once
- JHJH HISTORICAL SOCIETY & MUSEUMone grant, 2021 · $100k
- CFCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSONone grant, 2021 · $50k
- BPBALDWIN PUBLIC LIBRARYone grant, 2019 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
It is our mission at huron pines to conserve and enhance northern michigan's natural resources to ensure healthy water, protected places and vibrant communities. for alomst 50 years, our work across the forests, lakes and streams of…
Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
Maintain the swan valley's unique natural resources and ensure that a vibrant human community can sustain itself through stewardship, education, economic viability, and conservation on public and private lands.
The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…
Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.
The mission of the northern jaguar project is to preserve and recover the world's northermost population of the jaguar, its unique natural habitat, and native wildlife under its protection as a flagship, keystone, and umbrella species.
The wood river land trust's mission is to protect and sustain the treasured landscapes and life-giving waters of the wood river valley and to inspire love for this special place for generations to come.
Wwt's mission is to protect and restore water in rivers and streams across washington state. washington water trust restores and protects water in rivers and streams and promotes sustainable freshwater management in washington, and, more…
Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…
We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…
Panthera's mission is the conservation of the world's 40 wild cat species, many of which are endangered or threatened. panthera develops, implements and oversees wild cat conservation strategies on a global scale.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jackson Hole Land Trust and the most unlike its peers is Johann Fust Library Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds St John's Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE ↗
- Who funds DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds CLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING ↗
- Who funds GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE TETON RIVER INC ↗
- Who funds TETON RAPTOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds GRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds SENIOR CENTER OF JACKSON HOLE INC ↗
- Who funds Burr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State ↗
- Who funds Wyoming Wetland Society ↗
- Who funds DETROIT OPERA ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE VILLAGE CLUB ENRICHMENT FUND ↗
- Who funds JACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds JACKSON HOLE WILDLIFE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PAWS - PROVIDING ANIMAL WELFARE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SAFETY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds DETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
- Who funds RACQUET UP DETROIT ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · The Brooks Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Anna Emery Hanson Charitable Foundation #2 · Robert S & Grayce B Kerr Foundation · Karl M Johnson Foundation · The Andrew Allen Charitable Foundation · Perkins Charitable Foundation · Cross Charitable Foundation Attn John R Clark · Dte Energy Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization C & N Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.