· Private foundation
Anna Emery Hanson Charitable Foundation #2
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k27 grants · $81k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $42k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NICKLAUS CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION | $32,166 |
| MAX WARBURG COURAGE CURRICULUM | $10,000 |
| Tunnel to Towers | $9,200 |
| EMERALD NECKLACE CONSERVANCY | $7,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,000 |
| ST MARKS EPISCOPAL CHRUCH - GENERAL | $7,000 |
| SISTERS OF ST ANNE | $5,000 |
| GREEN BERET FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| THE NEW BEDFORD WHALING MUSEUM | $4,167 |
| GODFREY FOUNDATION FOR CINEMA THERAPY | $3,817 |
| ST JOHN'S HEALTH | $3,500 |
| MARION INSTITUTE Boogie at the Bog | $3,500 |
| MAHONEY-LOFTUS CADDIE SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $3,200 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE | $3,000 |
| YMCA SOUTHCOAST INC | $2,650 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
36 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NCNicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation2× · 2019–2020 · $61k · revenue +48%
- BABRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOL2× · 2019–2020 · $20k · revenue +44%
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION3× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +392%
Funded once
- BABRIMMER AND MAY SCHHOL CAPITAL CAMPAIGHone grant, 2024 · $15k
- BABRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOL ANNUAL FUNDone grant, 2022 · $15k
- SMST. MARKS EPISCOPAL CHURCHone grant, 2022 · $9k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Teton Valley Health Care Foundation strives to build mutually beneficial relationships with community members, businesses, and guests that, through their generosity, support a healthy and thriving valley. (Continued on Schedule O). Through…
The special forces foundation provides immediate and ongoing support to the special forces community and their families.
To sustain and enhance lowell observatory's mission of research and education by generating perpetual financial support.
To conserve the unique character of tennessee's natural and historic landscapes and sites for future generations.
The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…
The mission of the jackson hole conservation alliance is to protect the wildlife, wild places and community character of jackson hole.
The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.
Tmf empowers veterans and families of fallen heroes to develop character in future generations.
The mission of the foundation is to raise funds to support island health and its commitment to community health in and around anacortes, washington.
St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…
To fund the program and services of hospice of the nothwest to ensure dignified and compassionate care is available to anyone coping with a life-limiting diagnosis.one size doesn't always fit all, especially when it comes to quality of…
Ensure camp fire minnesota's strong future. with nature as the catalyst, camp fire minnesota energizes youth to discover their spark so their futures glow brighter.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Green Beret Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Godfrey Foundation for Cinema Therapy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 107 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Nicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation ↗
- Who funds BRIMMER AND MAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE MAX WARBURG COURAGE CURRICULUM INC ↗
- Who funds GREEN BERET FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EMERALD NECKLACE CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds St John's Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE ONE BY ONE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds TIP OF THE SPEAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE ↗
- Who funds Old Dartmouth Historical Society ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION SOUTHCOAST INC ↗
- Who funds WOODSON CENTER ↗
- Who funds THIN BLUE LINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GODFREY FOUNDATION FOR CINEMA THERAPY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · Boston Foundation Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · C & N Foundation · Bascom Charitable Foundation · Karl M Johnson Foundation · The Ludes Family Foundation · The Brooks Foundation · Giving Brands · Southcoast Community Foundation Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Anna Emery Hanson Charitable Foundation #2 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Old Dartmouth Historical Society — 2% of income from government
- Marion Art Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Emerald Necklace Conservancy Inc — 0% of income from government
- K9S for Warriors Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.