Skip to content

New York · Private foundation

C J Huang Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$95k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
4
Grants FY2024
9
Organizations funded FY2023
56%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$30,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$30,000
Organizations funded a year
6 to 12
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$2.1M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 56% of the organizations C J Huang Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 39% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureEmploymentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCivil RightsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving4$95k50%
FY20239$152k56%
FY20227$171k14%
FY20217$134k14%
FY20207$154k57%
FY20196$99k17%
FY201810$149k10%
FY201712$163kn/a
98% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$283kCivil Rights$215kCommunity Improvement$160kEducation$160kEmployment$145kHuman Services$69kHousing & Shelter$27kPhilanthropy$24kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 13 grantees

Plus 14 recipients with no EIN on record ($493k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget C J Huang Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChinatown Manpower Project Inc: $145,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetAsian American Arts Alliance Inc: $100,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetAsian American Writers Workshop Inc: $95,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetChinese-American Planning Council Inc: $85,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetShandelee Music Festival Inc: $40,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetMinkwon Center for Community Action Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetHamilton-Madison House Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChhaya Community Development Corporation: $26,666 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetThe Ong Family Foundation Co Law Office: $24,414 over 1y, 15% of budgetNational Queer Asian Pacific Islander Alliance Inc dba NQAPIA: $15,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetProject Hope - the People-To-People Health Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWnet: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAsian Cine-Vision Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 13.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Asian American Coalition for Children and Families IncNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Asian American Coalition for Children and Families Inc · Asian American Federation Inc · Tiger Baron Foundation Inc · Gofundmeorg · Ms Foundation for Women Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Ford Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare C J Huang Foundation with peer funders

About C J Huang Foundation

How much does C J Huang Foundation give?
C J Huang Foundation reported 4 grants totaling $95,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 6 and 12 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does C J Huang Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (25%), Civil Rights (19%), Community Improvement (14%).
Who are C J Huang Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Chinatown Manpower Project Inc ($145k), Asian American Arts Alliance Inc ($100k), Asian American Writers Workshop Inc ($95k).
Does C J Huang Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 56% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does C J Huang Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as C J Huang Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Asian American Coalition for Children and Families Inc, Asian American Federation Inc, Tiger Baron Foundation Inc.
Where is C J Huang Foundation based?
C J Huang Foundation is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on C J Huang’s filings →

More from the funding graph