Skip to content

· Private foundation

Byrd-Borland Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$89k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$51kYouth Development$47kCrime & Legal$44kHuman Services$42kCivil Rights$38kEducation$30kInternational$25kEnvironment$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLECTIVE POWER FOR REPRDUCTIVE JUSTICE$7,000
SAFE PASSAGE CAMINO SEGURO$6,000
TRENTON CIRCUS SQUAD$5,000
LITTLE SISTERS FUND$5,000
IMMIGRANT LEGAL ADVOCACY PROJECT$5,000
FLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE PROJECT$4,000
YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS$4,000
LOOK FOR THE GOOD PROJECT$4,000
TRUST WOMEN FOUNDATION$4,000
CENTER FOR GREIVING CHILDREN$3,000
350ORG$3,000
NASW DISASTER FUND$3,000
MAINE INSIDE OUT$3,000
PEBBLE STREET$3,000
MAINE FAMILY PLANNING$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $4k → 14%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $2k → 14%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $2k → 14%WOMEN'S CENTER OF BREVARD: $3k → 10%WOMEN'S CENTER OF BREVARD: $2k → 10%WOMEN'S CENTER OF BREVARD: $2k → 10%WOMEN'S CENTER OF BREVARD: $1k → 10%VICTIMWITNESS SERVICES OF SOUTH PHILADELPHIA: $1k → 22%VICTIMWITNESS SERVICES OF SOUTH PHILADELPHIA: $1k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
ID
IL
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
AZ
KS
NC
DC
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 99% of Byrd-Borland Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 16% of the giving stays in PA; by stated purpose, 1%.

Byrd-Borland Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$380k · 38 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

38 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
17

Total granted

$380k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+97%

Still filing today

50%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEnvironmentCrime & LegalHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    LITTLE SISTERS FUND INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $20k · revenue +46%
  • IL
    IMMIGRANT LEGAL ADVOCACY PROJECT
    6× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +75%
  • PH
    PROJECT HOSPITALITY INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $17k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • PC
    Portland Community Health Centergraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue +236%
  • MF
    MAUI FIRE RELIEF FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • N
    NASW
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Portland Immigrant Welcome Center

The Greater Portland Immigrant Welcome Center serves as a hub of collaboration that strengthens the immigrant community through language acquisition, economic integration and civic engagement.

Human Services
2
The Partnership Project Inc

The Partnership Project is organized and operated exclusively to enhance protection of the natural environment by improving the effectiveness of environmental organizations. It currently has 17 groups participating, including the largest…

Environment
3
Pro-Choice Washington

To protect and promote every persons right to access the full range of reproductive healthcare choices in Washington State, including safe and legal abortion, through education, advocacy, lobbying and coalition-building

—
4
Asylee Women Enterprise Inc

Asylee Women Enterprise (AWE), journeys with asylum seekers and other forced migrants as they navigate the immigration legal process, begin to heal from past trauma, and rebuild their lives in Baltimore.

International
5
Options Pregnancy Resource Centers Inc

Empowering life-affirming decisions

Health
6
MaineGeneral Health

To enhance, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities. We do that through a range of health care services for people of all ages, in a variety of care settings.

Health
7
Rogue Climate

Rogue Climate's mission is to empower Southern Oregon communities most impacted by climate change including low-income, rural, youth, seniors & communities of color, to win climate justice by organizing for clean energy, sustainable jobs &…

Education
8
Partnership for Policy Integrity

Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses data-driven advocacy and litigation to fight for forests, communities and the climate.

Environment
9
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
10
Planned Parenthood Maine Action Fund Inc

The Organization's purpose is to encourage and protect informed individual choice regarding reproductive health care, to advocate public policies which guarantee the right to choice and full and non-discriminatory access to reproductive…

Housing & Shelter
11
Asian Pacific Environmental Network

APEN builds immigrant and refugee power for a just transition with local roots and statewide impact so all people can live, work, learn, play and thrive in a clean and healthy environment.

Environment
12
Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington Dc Inc

Ppmw provides high-quality, compassionate healthcare, including reproductive care; promote sexual health; and advocate for reproductive rights and health equity for all.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Social Services of the Southwest; the most unlike its peers is Florida Wildlife Hospital & Sanctuary Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
19/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PHILDELPHIA YEARLY MEETING OF FRIENDS: $28,500 · OtherPHILDELPHIA YEARLY MEETING OF FRIENDSFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE PROJECT: $21,400 · OtherFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE PROJECTCENTER FOR GREIVING CHILDREN: $20,900 · OtherCENTER FOR GREIVING CHILDRENLOOK FOR THE GOOD PROJECT: $18,000 · OtherLOOK FOR THE GOOD PROJECTPROJECT HOSPITALITY INC: $17,000 · OtherPROJECT HOSPITALITY INCCOLECTIVE POWER FOR REPRDUCTIVE JUSTICE: $17,000 · OtherCOLECTIVE POWER FOR REPRDUCTIVE JUSTICECIVIL LIBERTIES AND PUBLIC POLICY PROGRAM: $16,500 · OtherCIVIL LIBERTIES AND PUBLIC POLICY PROGRAMSAFE PASSAGE CAMINO SEGURO: $16,500 · OtherSAFE PASSAGE CAMINO SEGUROTRENTON CIRCUS SQUAD: $15,000 · OtherTRENTON CIRCUS SQUADGREATER PORTLAND HEALTH: $15,000 · OtherGREATER PORTLAND HEALTHNASW DISASTER FUND: $12,500 · OtherUNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST CHURCH OF TUCSON: $10,000 · Other+29 more: $71,200 · Other+29 moreIMMIGRANT LEGAL ADVOCACY PROJECT: $18,000 · Crime & LegalTHE PENNSYLVANIA INNOCENCE PROJECT: $4,000 · Crime & LegalMaine Equal Justice Partners: $3,000 · Crime & LegalFAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE INC: $11,000 · HealthTrust Women Foundation Inc: $7,000 · HealthPortland Community Health Center: $4,000 · HealthPlanned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc: $2,500 · HealthNatural Resources Council of Maine Inc: $12,000 · Environment350ORG: $10,400 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE EARTH: $2,000 · EnvironmentLITTLE SISTERS FUND INC: $19,500 · InternationalTHE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $8,000 · Human ServicesSOUTH BREVARD WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesVICTIMWITNESS SERVICES OF SOUTH PHILADELPHIA: $2,000 · Human ServicesHOPEWORKS 'N CAMDEN INC: $11,000 · EducationAegis America Inc: $1,000 · Education
Other$279,500Crime & Legal$25,000Health$24,500Environment$24,400International$19,500Human Services$17,500Education$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLITTLE SISTERS FUND INC: $19,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetIMMIGRANT LEGAL ADVOCACY PROJECT: $18,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT HOSPITALITY INC: $17,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNatural Resources Council of Maine Inc: $12,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE INC: $11,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOPEWORKS 'N CAMDEN INC: $11,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budget350ORG: $10,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH BREVARD WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $7,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTrust Women Foundation Inc: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAINE INSIDE OUT: $6,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA WILDLIFE HOSPITAL & SANCTUARY INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPortland Community Health Center: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PENNSYLVANIA INNOCENCE PROJECT: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMaine Equal Justice Partners: $3,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPlanned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCampaign For Southern Equality: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE EARTH: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVICTIMWITNESS SERVICES OF SOUTH PHILADELPHIA: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTHWEST: $1,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for Portland Public Schools: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAegis America Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTASK Inc Trenton Area Soup Kitchen Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds IMMIGRANT LEGAL ADVOCACY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOSPITALITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Natural Resources Council of Maine Inc ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWORKS 'N CAMDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds 350ORG ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH BREVARD WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Trust Women Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MAINE INSIDE OUT ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA WILDLIFE HOSPITAL & SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds Portland Community Health Center ↗
  • Who funds THE PENNSYLVANIA INNOCENCE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Maine Equal Justice Partners ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc ↗
  • Who funds Campaign For Southern Equality ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE EARTH ↗
  • Who funds VICTIMWITNESS SERVICES OF SOUTH PHILADELPHIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John T Gorman FoundationME17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John T Gorman Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Sam L Cohen Foundation · Maine Health Access Foundation Inc · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · Impactassetsinc · The William Penn Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Byrd-Borland Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Byrd-Borland Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 45%
  • South Brevard Women's Center Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Byrd-Borland Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Byrd-Borland Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Byrd-Borland’s filings →

More from the funding graph