· Private foundation
Buuck Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k24 grants · $430k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $325k
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - TWIN CITIES | $250,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE (WELLSTONE) | $75,000 |
| GROVES LEARNING ORGANIZATION | $50,000 |
| APPETITE FOR CHANGE | $50,000 |
| LA FAMILY HOUSING | $50,000 |
| BRIDGING INC | $30,000 |
| MOUNT TAMALPAIS COLLEGE | $30,000 |
| ST PAUL FOUNDATION SHARING FUND | $25,000 |
| REMOTE AREA MEDICAL | $25,000 |
| COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS CA | $25,000 |
| SMALL PRESS TRAFFIC | $25,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - MN | $25,000 |
| NATURE CONSERVANCY OF MN | $20,000 |
| LOAVES AND FISHES | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $430k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
65 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 44 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $335k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NHNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE7× · 2017–2023 · $355k · revenue +97%
- BIBridging Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $215k · revenue +29%
- LFLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION6× · 2018–2024 · $180k · revenue +98%
Funded once
- DSDowntown Streets Incgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +50%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $50k
CITY YEAR INCone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
Move minnesota leads the movement for an equitable and sustainable transportation system that puts people first. we are passionate about connecting communities, ending the climate crisis, expanding access to jobs and resources, and…
Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.
Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.
Engaging the community to end hunger
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.
United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.
The mission of community shares of minnesota is to create a fair, just and equitable minnesota. community shares of minnesota accomplishes its mission by: supporting collective action to eliminate root causes of inequality and injustice;…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Minneapolis Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Viviennes Joy Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Bridging Inc ↗
- Who funds LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAINT PAUL & MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds APPETITE FOR CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds The Cookie Cart ↗
- Who funds PRISON UNIVERSITY PROJECT INC DBA MOUNT TAMALPAIS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Small Press Traffic Literary Arts Center ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
- Who funds HOUSING IN ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds Coalition On Homelessness ↗
- Who funds GREAT RIVER GREENING ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BRIDGING AZ FURNITURE BANK ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE ↗
- Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds Black Men Teach ↗
- Who funds VALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER MINNESOTA HOUSING FUND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Minnesota Community Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Mortenson Family Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Pohlad Family Foundation · Hardenbergh Foundation · Fr Bigelow Foundation · Margaret a Cargill Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Buuck Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Buuck Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Buuck Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.