Skip to content

· Private foundation

Burton G and Anne C Greenblatt Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$515k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$812kReligion$806kPhilanthropy$545kInternational$360kHuman Services$192kYouth Development$90kArts & Culture$78kCommunity Improvement$75kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $350k
$6,800
Median grant
11
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALA INSTITUTE$100,000
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION$80,000
ALEPH SOCIETY$60,000
JEWISH FEDERATION$60,000
CHABAD LUBAVITCH$50,000
MEMORIAL SLOANE KETTERING$25,000
JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY$25,000
MADISON SQUARE BOYS GIRLS CLUB FOUN$20,000
USC SHOAH FOUNDATION$15,000
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF CENTRAL NJ$13,000
MIDWEST CENTER FOR HOLOCAUST$12,000
BRAIN RESEARCH FUND$6,800
APPALACHIAN STATE UNIV FDN$6,000
COLORADO HOLOCAUST EDUCATORS$6,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $171k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PRINCETON SENIOR RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 11%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $40k → 7%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $25k → 7%COVENANT HOUSE INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 17%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $25k → 7%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $25k → 7%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $25k → 7%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $25k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
KS
NC
DC
OK
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 29 repeat orgs$173k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
18

Total granted

$3.1M
$167k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+9%

Still filing today

31%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SALA INSTITUTE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $600k
  • AS
    ALEPH SOCIETY INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $395k · revenue +9%
  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $390k

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OGEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +670%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF UBS OPTIMUS
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • JR
    JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +67%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
2
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
3
Mjhs Medical Associates Pc

The purpose for which the corporation is formed is to practice the profession of medicine for affiliates of metropolitan jewish health system, inc., which provide medical and health services.

Health
4
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
5
The Mount Sinai Hospital

Mount sinai is committed to the advancement of the art and science of medicine through clinical excellence. the central mission consists of high-quality patient care and teaching conducted in an atmosphere of social concern and scholarly…

Health
6
Metropolitan Jewish Home Care Inc

Mjhs home care is a not-for-profit, certified home health agency (chha), committed to providing skilled nursing and rehabilitation services for individuals recuperating at home from an acute episode, often elderly and at-risk members of…

Health
7
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
8
Isabella Geriatric Center Inc

Operating as isabella center for rehabilitation and nursing care, isabella is a 705-bed not-for-profit organization that is a member of the mjhs health system family. isabella is committed to providing exceptional short-term, sub-acute…

Human Services
9
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
10
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Foundation

Operating under the name mjhs foundation, the mission of this philanthropic organization is to raise the funds necessary to support the charitable health care efforts of the organizations within the mjhs health system family. with roots…

Health
11
Mjhs Hospice and Palliative Care Inc

To provide hospice services on both an inpatient and outpatient basis

Human Services
12
Network of Jewish Human Service Agencies Inc

The network is an international membership association of more than 170 non profit human service agencies in the united states, canada and israel. its members provide a full range of human services for the jewish community and beyond,…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust; the most unlike its peers is Jewish Relief Agency Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
13/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALA INSTITUTE: $600,000 · OtherSALA INSTITUTEJEWISH FEDERATION: $390,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONCHABAD LUBAVITCH: $300,000 · OtherCHABAD LUBAVITCHPer schedule attached: $242,422 · OtherPer schedule attachedUSC SHOAH FOUNDATION: $85,000 · Other+30 more: $483,400 · Other+30 moreALEPH SOCIETY INC: $395,000 · InternationalALEPH SOCIETY INCThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $285,000 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint…African Mission Healthcare Foundation: $75,150 · InternationalAfrican Mission Healthcar…+1 more: $5,000 · InternationalJEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $165,000 · Human Services+2 more: $6,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $155,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $75,000 · HealthHOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · HealthHOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER INC: $10,000 · Health+1 more: $180 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF OGEN INC: $50,000 · Community ImprovementFAMILY PROMISE OF ESSEX COUNTY INC: $20,200 · Housing & Shelter
Other$2,100,822International$760,150Human Services$171,000Philanthropy$155,500Health$125,180Community Improvement$50,000Housing & Shelter$20,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALEPH SOCIETY INC: $395,000 over 5y, 8.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $285,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $165,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $155,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAfrican Mission Healthcare Foundation: $75,150 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF OGEN INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHINA LAKE ASSOCIATION: $25,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF ESSEX COUNTY INC: $20,200 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetJEWISH RELIEF AGENCY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetOUTREACH AMERICA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetALL STARS PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRINCETON SENIOR RESOURCE CENTER DBA CENTER FOR MODERN AGING PRINCETON: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMetropolitan Opera Association Inc: $3,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOak Hill Academy: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMichael Rolfe Pancreatic Cancer Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA WOUNDED WARRIORS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALEPH SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds African Mission Healthcare Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OGEN INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHINA LAKE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF ESSEX COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds OUTREACH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL STARS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds PRINCETON SENIOR RESOURCE CENTER DBA CENTER FOR MODERN AGING PRINCETON ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ12.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Burton G and Anne C Greenblatt Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Burton G and Anne C Greenblatt Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 33%
  • Family Promise of Essex County Inc: 33% of income from government
  • Holy Name Medical Center Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Burton G and Anne C Greenblatt Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Burton G and Anne C Greenblatt Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Burton G and Anne C Greenblatt’s filings →

More from the funding graph