Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Burke Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$261k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0177% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Religion$655kHuman Services$282kEducation$108kYouth Development$31kHealth$20kAnimals$16kInternational$10kPhilanthropy$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $88k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $160k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CHURCH OF ELEVEN22$100,000
Individual grant recipient$60,000
OKOA REFUGE$47,500
THE BELL CENTER$20,000
K9S FOR WARRIORS$10,000
TREIGN UP FOUNDATION$10,000
ARIZE TOGETHER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
KIM'S OPEN DOOR$2,500
MANOS DE FE$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SPONSORED BY GRACE: $2k → 14%ROOTS FOR LIFE: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 9 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +87% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

$1.3M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+87%
+40%

Still filing today

56%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OR
    OKOA REFUGE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $280k · revenue +262%
  • KA
    KAPPA ALPHA ORDER EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2024 · $35k · revenue +26%
  • BA
    Boys and Girls Club of Northeast Florida Inc
    3× · 2021–2023 · $26k · revenue +143%

Funded once

  • LO
    LOVE ONE INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +4%
  • JM
    JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +75%
  • RF
    ROOTS FOR LIFE CORPORATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
One With God

To teach the bible to pastors and church leaders in africa and asia, while funding food for orphaned and abandonded children

Health
2
Arise Children Outreach International

To assist children in poverty with schooling (through financial grants and/or child support). to assist foreign churches with supplies for ministry to local families.

International
3
Love in Action Missions Global Inc

As a faith-based community development organization, liam global operates in service of underprivileged communities. through both frontline crisis response and holistic community projects, we journey alongside destitute, abused,…

Religion
4
Into the Jordan Ministries Inc

Into the jordan ministries exists to bring the hope of jesus christ to trafficked and exloited women in southwest florida.

Religion
5
Reaching Out to the Nations Inc

Reaching Out To The Nations' mission is to both preach and demonstrate the love of Go through its projects and programs which include preaching, food distribution, widow and orphan assistance and leadership training.

Religion
6
Vision International Missions

To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…

Religion
7
Grace Open Doors International

Identify gifted leaders worldwide engaged in holistic ministry and support them in unity. the heart of holistic ministry is meeting physical needs of food, clothing, and shelter.

Religion
8
Kids International Ministries Inc

Kids international ministries was organized for the purpose of implenting and operating orphanages in impoverished and/or underserved foreign countries to provide long-term and short--term services, food and basic life needs to orphaned…

Human Services
9
Light of the Gospel Ministries

In association with Light of the Gospel Church, we propagate the gospel of Jesus Christ by all available means, both at home and in foreign lands. We provide evangelism and rehabilitation to orphaned and/or drug addicted children and…

Religion
10
Jones Alternative Inc

Jones Alternative provides Therapeutic Residential Group Home services to female victims ofsexual trauma, including molestation, rape, incest, and human trafficking, who are underthe care of the Florida Department of Children and Families…

Health
11
Look Unto Jesus Ministries International Inc

Lujm is a christian, gospel-oriented humanitarian organization that is dedicated to working with children, families and their communities to enable them reach their maximum potential by tackling issues such as poverty and social injustice.

Religion
12
Joy International

JOY International is dedicated to the prevention of child trafficking and to the freedom, healing, and empowerment of trafficked children, teens, and young adults worldwide.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Okoa Refuge Inc and the most unlike its peers is One Protest Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE CHURCH OF ELEVEN22 — $650,000 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF ELEVEN22Individual grant recipient — $197,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE — $55,000 · OtherVIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE+4 more — $34,500 · OtherOKOA REFUGE INC — $280,000 · InternationalOKOA REFUGE INCKAPPA ALPHA ORDER EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $35,000 · EducationLOVE ONE INTERNATIONAL — $10,000 · EducationRANDOLPH-MACON COLLEGE — $10,000 · EducationJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · EducationHUGS ACROSS THE COUNTY INC — $3,000 · EducationBoys and Girls Club of Northeast Florida Inc — $25,600 · Youth DevelopmentMANOS DE FE INC — $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentKIM'S OPEN DOOR INC — $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BELL CENTER FOR EARLY INTERVENTION PROGRAMS — $20,000 · HealthK9S FOR WARRIORS INC — $15,000 · AnimalsONE PROTEST INC — $1,425 · AnimalsROOTS FOR LIFE CORPORATION — $5,000 · Human ServicesLIFEWORK LEADERSHIP FIRST COAST — $3,000 · Human ServicesSPONSORED BY GRACE INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesARIZE TOGETHER INC — $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$936,500International$280,000Education$63,000Youth Development$30,600Health$20,000Animals$16,425Human Services$10,000Housing & Shelter$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOKOA REFUGE INC — $280,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetKAPPA ALPHA ORDER EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Northeast Florida Inc — $25,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BELL CENTER FOR EARLY INTERVENTION PROGRAMS — $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE ONE INTERNATIONAL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRANDOLPH-MACON COLLEGE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZE TOGETHER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetROOTS FOR LIFE CORPORATION — $5,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetHUGS ACROSS THE COUNTY INC — $3,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetLIFEWORK LEADERSHIP FIRST COAST — $3,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMANOS DE FE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKIM'S OPEN DOOR INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSPONSORED BY GRACE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetONE PROTEST INC — $1,425 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida IncFL13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Burke Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • K9S for Warriors Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Burke Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Burke Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph