Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Burke Family Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.9M
Granted FY2020
8
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Health$1.4MHousing & Shelter$300kEducation$195kYouth Development$110kInternational$50kFood & Nutrition$25kRecreation & Sports$15kMembership Benefit$5kOther$0
02FY2020 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAINE MEDICAL CENTER$750,000
DANA FARBER FUND (AML RESEARCH FUND$600,000
PREBLE STREET$300,000
SPIRIT SERIES$50,000
PIVOT$50,000
WALTHAM BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$50,000
FRIENDS OF PORTLAND ADULT EDUCATION$25,000
GOOD SHEPHERD FOOD BANK$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $300k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PREBLE STREET: $300k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

13%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$265k · 7 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2020, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$265k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+75%

Still filing today

43%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
HealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesInternationalEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SPIRIT SERIES INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $105k · revenue +55%
  • TT
    The Telling Room
    3× · 2017–2019 · $45k · revenue +55%
  • PC
    Portland Community Squash
    3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue +75%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF HOPE CEMETERY & WOODS
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -91%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Penobscot Community Health Center

Penobscot Community Health Center (PCHC) is a non-profit organization incorporated in 1997 that is governed by a Board of community volunteers and is the largest Federally Qualified Health Center in Maine. PCHC is driven by its mission…

Health
2
Portland Seamens Friend Society
3
Portsmouth General Hospital Foundation
4
Eastern Maine Medical Center Northern Light Eastern Maine Medical Cen

Eastern Maine Medical Center d/b/a Northern Light Eastern Maine Medical Center strives to provide exceptional primary and specialty healthcare with a passionate pursuit of excellence in patient safety, clinical quality, and service. Our…

Health
5
Lakewood Northern Light Continuing Care Lakewood

Lakewood d/b/a Northern Light Continuing Care Lakewood is a 105 bed long-term care facility that provides skilled, dementia and long-term nursing care.

Health
6
Maine Quality Counts

Maine Quality Counts is transforming health and healthcare in Maine by leading, collaborating, and aligning improvement efforts.

7
Maine Health Access Foundation Inc
Health
8
Massachusetts E-Health Collaborative
9
Maine Council on Aging

A broad multi-disciplinary network that works to ensure we can all live healthy, engaged, and secure lives as we age in our homes and communities. With the voices of people with lived experience, we work on policy issues related to…

Unclassified
10
Portsmouth Reads
Education
11
Penobscot Bay Medical Center

Penobscot Bay Medical Center (PBMC) is an acute care hospital that offers inpatient and outpatient care, diagnostic, therapeutic and rehabilitative services, patient and community education, and a full range of specialty services through…

12
PassivhausMAINE

PassivhausMAINE is a non-profit organization committed to decreasing carbon emissions, dependency on fossil fuels and the costs for winter heating in Maine.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spirit Series Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MaineHealth — $750,000 · HealthMaineHealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $30,000 · HealthDANA FARBER FUND (AML RESEARCH FUND — $600,000 · OtherDANA FARBER FUND (AML RESEARCH FUNDWALTHAM BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC — $50,000 · OtherWALTHAM BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INCUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT — $35,000 · OtherSAINT ANGELA MERICI SCHOOL — $30,000 · Other+5 more — $80,000 · Other+5 morePREBLE STREET — $300,000 · Human ServicesPREBLE STREETSPIRIT SERIES INC — $105,000 · Arts & CulturePIVOT WORKS INC — $50,000 · InternationalThe Telling Room — $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF PORTLAND ADULT EDUCATION — $25,000 · Education
Health$780,000Other$795,000Human Services$300,000Arts & Culture$105,000International$50,000Youth Development$45,000Education$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMaineHealth — $750,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREBLE STREET — $300,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSPIRIT SERIES INC — $105,000 over 4y, 6.8% of budgetWALTHAM BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetThe Telling Room — $45,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF PORTLAND ADULT EDUCATION — $25,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetGood Shepherd Food Bank — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPortland Community Squash — $15,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF HOPE CEMETERY & WOODS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maine Community Foundation IncME15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Burke Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 29%
  • Waltham Boys & Girls Club Inc29% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph