How much did BULOVA GALE FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 44% of BULOVA GALE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

rehabilitationanimal rescue

2019

mothersanimal rescueaccessartschildren

2020

trainingaccess

2022

dogsrescueownerschildrenarts

2023

artsaccesscare

2024

careartsaccessprevent

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k24 grants · $87k
$10k–50k4 grants · $53k

$3,000

Median grant

States reached

$3.1M

Total assets

Largest grants

TRUSTEES OF GRINNELL COLLEGE$20,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE BERKSHIRES$13,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA FOUNDAT$10,000
MANASOTA ASALH$10,000
SARASOTA SHARKS INC$9,000
FOUNDATION FOR ANIMAL CARE EDUCATIO$8,100
HEVREH OF SOUTHERN BERKSHIRE$7,500
GIRL RISING$7,500
MAMA'S KITCHEN$5,600
MEMORIAL SLOANE KETTERING$5,000
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY$5,000
CHILDREN FIRST INC$5,000
ACLU FOUNDATION INC$4,000
THE TREVOR PROJECT$3,000
PILOTS TO THE RESCUE$2,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 11%. 10% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$913k · 41 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +84% since the first grant, against +74% for the ones you funded once.

41 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$913k

$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%

+74%

Still filing today

44%

59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

AnimalsEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TO
TRUSTEES OF GRINNELL COLLEGE
7× · 2017–2024 · $140k · revenue +48%
JF
JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE BERKSHIRES
7× · 2017–2024 · $72k · revenue +88%
NEURO CHALLENGE FOUNDATION
7× · 2017–2024 · $59k · revenue +125%

Funded once

HS
HONOR SANCTUARY
one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +4%
TW
THE WILMA THEATRE
one grant, 2019 · $3k
SC
SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION
one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -55%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Animal Care Sanctuary

The humane compassionate treatment of all animals.

Animals

The Wildcat Sanctuary

Provide sanctuary to wild cats in need and inspire change to end the captive wildlife crisis.

Animals

Naples Zoo Inc

To inspire people of all ages to respect, value and help conserve wildlife and our natural world.

Animals

Humane Society for the Prevention

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals

The Humane Society for Seattleking

Animal welfare organization

Animals

Marin Humane Society

Improving the lives of animals and people through advocacy, education, and support.

Animals

Farm Sanctuary Inc

We pursue bold solutions to end animal agriculture and foster (continued on sch. o)just and compassionate vegan living through education and policy advocacy.

Animals

Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and our planet by creating protected reserves.

International

Boston Architectural College

Founded 131 years ago, the boston architectural college is a recognized institution providing excellence in practice-integrated design education to members of diverse communities with students representing 35 countries. the bac offers…

—

United Animal Nations Dba Redrover

To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals.

—

Fauna & Flora International Usa Inc

Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.

Philanthropy

Wildlife Conservation Network Inc

To protect endangered species & preserve their natural habitats.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundations of the Hudson and the most unlike its peers is Helen Woodward Animal Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/32

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,533

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

31 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

31/31

Grantees still filing

29/31

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$498,167Education$196,083Philanthropy$72,000Health$58,500Employment$46,500Food & Nutrition$42,650Recreation & Sports$34,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Berkshire Taconic CommunityMA17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Berkshire Taconic Community · The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co · Henry L Kimelman Family Foundation · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Hrbt Foundation · Manatee Community Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation BULOVA GALE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MANASOTA ASALH.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~18 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 4.6× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 453969420 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MANASOTA ASALH, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 18 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 4% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Bulova Gale Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Bulova Gale Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

BULOVA GALE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

31 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Bulova Gale Foundation?

More from the funding graph

BULOVA GALE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

31 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Bulova Gale Foundation?

More from the funding graph