Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bulova Gale Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$140k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$268kHealth$128kAnimals$99kReligion$76kPhilanthropy$75kFood & Nutrition$56kArts & Culture$48kEmployment$47kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k24 grants · $87k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $53k
$3,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRUSTEES OF GRINNELL COLLEGE$20,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE BERKSHIRES$13,000
MANASOTA ASALH$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA FOUNDAT$10,000
SARASOTA SHARKS INC$9,000
FOUNDATION FOR ANIMAL CARE EDUCATIO$8,100
HEVREH OF SOUTHERN BERKSHIRE$7,500
GIRL RISING$7,500
MAMA'S KITCHEN$5,600
MEMORIAL SLOANE KETTERING$5,000
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY$5,000
CHILDREN FIRST INC$5,000
ACLU FOUNDATION INC$4,000
THE TREVOR PROJECT$3,000
PILOTS TO THE RESCUE$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 10% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE ARC OF SAN DIEGO: $2k → 11%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $1k → 5%THE ARC OF SAN DIEGO: $2k → 11%THE ARC OF SAN DIEGO: $2k → 11%THE ARC OF SAN DIEGO: $2k → 11%THE ARC OF SAN DIEGO: $1k → 11%COLUMBIA COUNTY RECOVERY KITCHEN: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
IA
PA
CT
CA
CO
KY
AZ
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of Bulova Gale Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Bulova Gale Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$841k · 40 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +70% since the first grant, against -14% for the ones you funded once.

40 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
17

Total granted

$841k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
-14%

Still filing today

65%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
AnimalsEducationHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    THE TRUSTEES OF GRINNELL COLLEGE
    7× · 2017–2024 · $140k · revenue +62%
  • University of South Florida Foundation Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +132%
  • NEURO CHALLENGE FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $59k · revenue +125%

Funded once

  • HS
    HONOR SANCTUARY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -15%
  • TW
    THE WILMA THEATERgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +47%
  • SC
    SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -55%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

2
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
3
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
4
Farm Sanctuary Inc

We pursue bold solutions to end animal agriculture and foster just and compassionate vegan living through education and policy advocacy.

Animals
5
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
6
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
7
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Naples Zoo Inc

Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…

Animals
9
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

11
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
12
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Thomas Jefferson University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersJewish Community FederationsFood Pantries & AssistanceAnimal Rescue and AdoptionLgbtq+ Community CentersChristian Missionary Organi…Government Accountability R…Pregnancy Support ServicesCommunity Arts OrganizationsDevelopmental Disabilities …Professional Ballet Compani…Public University Foundatio…Wildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Urban Agriculture & Food Ac…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%19%35–55yr16%38%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/41
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,524

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
27/40
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE TRUSTEES OF GRINNELL COLLEGE — $140,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF GRINNELL COLLEG…University of South Florida Foundation Inc — $70,000 · EducationUniversity of South Florida Fou…Children First Inc — $28,500 · EducationChildren First IncTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $26,583 · EducationTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY+1 more — $1,000 · EducationHEVREH OF SOUTHERN BERKSHIRE INC — $74,400 · OtherHEVREH OF SOUTHERN BERKSHIRE INCFOUNDATION FOR ANIMAL CARE EDUCATIO — $39,600 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR ANIMAL CARE EDUCATIOMINIATURE SCHNAUZER FRIENDS RESCUE — $20,000 · OtherMINIATURE SCHNAUZER FRIENDS RESCUECONCORDIA UNIV FNDTN DE L'UNIVERSIT — $14,500 · OtherSARASOTA SHARKS INC — $34,000 · OtherSARASOTA SHARKS INCHELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER — $12,550 · OtherMANASOTA ASALH INC — $20,000 · OtherMANASOTA ASALH INCGirl Rising — $22,500 · OtherGirl Rising+36 more — $127,967 · Other+36 moreNEURO CHALLENGE FOUNDATION INC — $58,500 · HealthNEURO CHALLE…MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $30,000 · HealthMEMORIAL SLO…MARCH OF DIMES INC — $14,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIM…+1 more — $3,500 · HealthJEWISH FEDERATION OF THE BERKSHIRES — $72,000 · PhilanthropyRAINBOW RAILROAD USA INC — $3,050 · PhilanthropyMAMA'S KITCHEN — $34,600 · Food & NutritionALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC — $8,050 · Food & NutritionBERKSHIRES BOUNTY INC — $6,500 · Food & NutritionHAWTHORNE VALLEY ASSOCIATION INC — $46,500 · EmploymentAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $32,250 · Civil RightsTREVOR PROJECT INC — $7,350 · Civil Rights
Education$266,083Other$365,517Health$106,000Philanthropy$75,050Food & Nutrition$49,150Employment$46,500Civil Rights$39,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF GRINNELL COLLEGE — $140,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF THE BERKSHIRES — $72,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc — $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNEURO CHALLENGE FOUNDATION INC — $58,500 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetHAWTHORNE VALLEY ASSOCIATION INC — $46,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMAMA'S KITCHEN — $34,600 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSARASOTA SHARKS INC — $34,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $32,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetChildren First Inc — $28,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $26,583 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGirl Rising — $22,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMANASOTA ASALH INC — $20,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER — $12,550 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC — $8,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE INSTITUTE INC — $8,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ARC OF SAN DIEGO — $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC — $7,350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE CENTER OF VENICE INC — $7,334 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBERKSHIRES BOUNTY INC — $6,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetHONOR SANCTUARY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBERKSHIRE PULSE INC — $4,200 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE-BERKSHIRES INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRAINBOW RAILROAD USA INC — $3,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS LILITH FUND — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMINDLEAPS — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WILMA THEATER — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPILOTS TO THE RESCUE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVINTAGE PAWS SANCTUARY INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEXPERIENCE CAMPS — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMPHILL GHENT INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA PRECIOUS CHILD INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA COUNTY RECOVERY KITCHEN INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MALALA FUND — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetArts Business Collaborative — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE FARMING ASSOCIATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF GRINNELL COLLEGE
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE BERKSHIRES
  • Who funds University of South Florida Foundation Inc
  • Who funds NEURO CHALLENGE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HAWTHORNE VALLEY ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds MAMA'S KITCHEN
  • Who funds SARASOTA SHARKS INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
  • Who funds Children First Inc
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Girl Rising
  • Who funds MANASOTA ASALH INC
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC
  • Who funds HELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER
  • Who funds ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds THE NATURE INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds THE ARC OF SAN DIEGO
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds WILDLIFE CENTER OF VENICE INC
  • Who funds BERKSHIRES BOUNTY INC
  • Who funds HONOR SANCTUARY INC
  • Who funds BERKSHIRE PULSE INC
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE-BERKSHIRES INC
  • Who funds RAINBOW RAILROAD USA INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS LILITH FUND
  • Who funds MINDLEAPS
  • Who funds THE WILMA THEATER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation IncMA19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Velmans Foundation Inc · Henry L Kimelman Family Foundation · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · Galler Family Foundation Inc · Saibel Foundation Inc · The Greater Barrington Foundation Inc Dba the Barrington Foundation · T Backer Fund Inc · Shoval Foundation · Hrbt Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bulova Gale Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 90%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • Children First Inc100% of income from government
  • Volunteers in Medicine-Berkshires Inc10% of income from government
  • Berkshire Pulse Inc1% of income from government
  • All Faiths Food Bank Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bulova Gale Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Bulova Gale Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph