Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Budnik Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$288k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$441kInternational$340kPhilanthropy$241kEducation$229kEnvironment$144kHealth$81kHuman Services$77kArts & Culture$66kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $225k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$15,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAUDATO SI PROJECT INC$50,000
WYA FOUNDATION INC$36,000
WETHERSFIELD FOUNDATION$31,402
THE LYCEUM$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
CATHOLIC NEAR EAST WELFARE ASSOCIAT$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM$15,000
MARY'S MEALS USA$15,000
LYME ACADEMY OF FINE ARTS$12,185
CATHOLIC CHARITIES DUTCHESS COUNTY$10,000
CHRIST THE BRIDEGROOM MONASTERY$10,000
SISTERS OF LIFE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
THE SALESIANUM TRUST$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LIFE'S CONNECTION - MUKWONAGO CTR: $5k → 5%LIFE'S CONNECTION - MUKWONAGO CTR: $5k → 5%LIFE'S CONNECTION - MUKWONAGO CTR: $2k → 5%LIFE'S CONNECTION - MUKWONAGO CTR: $2k → 5%MONTESSORI DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIPS: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
OR
WY
IN
OH
NJ
CT
TN
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 17% of Budnik Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 13% of the giving stays in OH; read by stated purpose it is 10% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Budnik Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 24% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 21 repeat orgs$236k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +148% since the first grant, against +45% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
16

Total granted

$1.4M
$159k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+148%
+45%

Still filing today

62%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    WYA Foundation Inc dba World Youth Alliance
    9× · 2017–2025 · $325k · revenue +14%
  • WF
    WETHERSFIELD FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $233k · revenue +41%
  • LS
    LAUDATO SI PROJECT INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $144k · revenue +944%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE BRIDEGROOM LTD
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue -56%
  • VH
    Veranova Healthgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $26k · revenue +31%
  • SC
    ST CECILIA CONGREGATION
    one grant, 2022 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Collegium Institute

Collegium Institute is a Catholic intellectual apostolate that fosters the Catholic intellectual tradition within the University of Pennsylvania community and within the greater region and secular academia. (Continued on Sch. O)

2
Wethersfield Institute for Catholic Thought Inc
3
The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

Education
4
Chesterton Academy of St Philip Neri

Inspired by Saint Pope John Paul II, we take as our motto Cultura Vitae, the culture of life, as our students triumph over the materialism and despair that pervades our culture in order to have life and have it abundantly. We do this with…

Education
5
International Catholic Jurists Forum Inc

The International Catholic Jurists Forum (ICJF) was established to produce, compile, and share resources on fundamental human rights under attack in the regional and international human rights protection systems. It operates as a forum for…

Religion
6
Siena University

Siena university is a learning community advancing the ideals of a liberal arts education, rooted in its identity as a franciscan and catholic institution. as a learning community, siena is committed to a student-centered education…

Education
7
Regina Angelorum Institute

Inspired by don boscos vision of the two pillarsatop which stood our lady on one pillar and the most holy eucharist on the otherthe goal of regina angelorum institute is to help souls come to know and love jesus, especially in the blessed…

Religion
8
International Academy of Fine Art

The florence acadamy of art was founed in 1991 by daniel graves (see schedule o for details).

International
9
Chesterton Academy of Fort Worth

To inspire and influence the culture in Fort Worth by joyfully engaging our students with the classics, which are the foundation of Western civilization and point to the most important historical even of humanity, the Incarnation of our…

Education
10
Regina Luminis Academy

Regina luminis academy is a private, independent school grades pre-k through 12, founded, with the help of gods grace, to assist parents in the education and formation of their children by providing a classical liberal arts education in…

Education
11
Newman University Inc

We are a catholic university named for saint john henry newman and founded by the adorers of the blood of christ for the purpose of empowering graduates to transform society. our core values (see schedule o for continuation)

Education
12
St Therese Academy

Guided by Christian faith, St. Therese Academy guides students with Montessori, Catechesis of the Good Shepherd and classical principles to live out the gospel message, achieve academic excellence, and joyfulluy lead by faith, virtue and…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Josaphat Basilica Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wethersfield Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLand Conservation Organizat…Community Arts OrganizationsChristian Missionary Organi…Pregnancy Support ServicesIndependent K-8 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Professional Ballet Compani…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%8%<5yr14%19%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr19%19%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%3%<5yr14%22%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr19%36%20–35yr13%5%35–55yr16%17%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,732

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WETHERSFIELD INSTITUTE FOR CATHOLIC — $100,000 · OtherWETHERSFIELD INSTITUTE FOR CATHOLICSISTERS OF LIFE — $80,000 · OtherSISTERS OF LIFEINTERNATIONAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY — $70,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient — $46,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHRIST THE BRIDEGROOM MONASTERY — $41,991 · OtherCHRIST THE BRIDEGROOM MONASTERYHERSHEY MONTESSORI SCHOOL — $40,000 · OtherHERSHEY MONTESSORI SCHOOLHOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM — $37,440 · OtherHOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEMCATHOLIC NEAR EAST WELFARE ASSOCIAT — $37,440 · OtherCATHOLIC NEAR EAST WELFARE ASSOCIATIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherVeranova Health — $26,000 · Other+20 more — $190,140 · Other+20 moreWYA Foundation Inc dba World Youth Alliance — $324,950 · Youth DevelopmentWYA Foundation Inc dba…WETHERSFIELD FOUNDATION INC — $233,402 · EnvironmentWETHERSFIELD FO…LAUDATO SI PROJECT INC — $144,000 · ReligionLAUDATO SI PROJ…ST JOSAPHAT BASILICA FOUNDATION INC — $53,000 · ReligionST JOSAPHAT BAS…FRIENDS OF THE BRIDEGROOM LTD — $30,000 · ReligionFRIENDS OF THE …THE LYCEUM — $80,000 · EducationPadre Pio Academy — $6,500 · EducationWyoming Catholic College — $5,000 · EducationNATIONAL CIVIC ART SOCIETY — $34,000 · Arts & CultureTHE RAFFAELLA BALLET INC STROIK — $15,000 · Arts & CultureLYME ACADEMY OF FINE ARTS — $12,185 · Arts & CulturePRO LABORE DEI INC — $35,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$699,011Youth Development$324,950Environment$233,402Religion$227,000Education$91,500Arts & Culture$61,185Housing & Shelter$35,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWYA Foundation Inc dba World Youth Alliance — $324,950 over 9y, 6.3% of budgetWETHERSFIELD FOUNDATION INC — $233,402 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetLAUDATO SI PROJECT INC — $144,000 over 7y, 20% of budgetTHE LYCEUM — $80,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetST JOSAPHAT BASILICA FOUNDATION INC — $53,000 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetHERSHEY MONTESSORI SCHOOL — $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPRO LABORE DEI INC — $35,500 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetNATIONAL CIVIC ART SOCIETY — $34,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE BRIDEGROOM LTD — $30,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetVeranova Health — $26,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetLUMEN CHRISTI INSTITUTE — $22,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE RAFFAELLA BALLET INC STROIK — $15,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetMary's Meals USA Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIFE'S CONNECTION INC — $14,200 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetLYME ACADEMY OF FINE ARTS — $12,185 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE ON RELIGION AND PUBLIC LIFE INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPadre Pio Academy — $6,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetMONTESSORI DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIPS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRIO GRANDE VALLEY PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetWyoming Catholic College — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRATENAHL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WYA Foundation Inc dba World Youth Alliance
  • Who funds WETHERSFIELD FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds LAUDATO SI PROJECT INC
  • Who funds THE LYCEUM
  • Who funds ST JOSAPHAT BASILICA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HERSHEY MONTESSORI SCHOOL
  • Who funds PRO LABORE DEI INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL CIVIC ART SOCIETY
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE BRIDEGROOM LTD
  • Who funds Veranova Health
  • Who funds LUMEN CHRISTI INSTITUTE
  • Who funds THE RAFFAELLA BALLET INC STROIK
  • Who funds Mary's Meals USA Inc
  • Who funds LIFE'S CONNECTION INC
  • Who funds LYME ACADEMY OF FINE ARTS
  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE ON RELIGION AND PUBLIC LIFE INC
  • Who funds Padre Pio Academy
  • Who funds MONTESSORI DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIPS
  • Who funds RIO GRANDE VALLEY PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Wyoming Catholic College

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bessemer Giving FundNJ11.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bessemer Giving Fund · Baird Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Budnik Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Budnik Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Budnik Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph