Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bryant Charitable Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2022
8
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Health$82kEducation$42kEnvironment$27kInternational$24kCivil Rights$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kHuman Services$6kPhilanthropy$2kOther$0
02FY2022 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k7 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation$10,000
Planned Parenthood$5,000
Antelope Valley College Foundation$5,000
Sansum Diabetes Research Institute$5,000
California State University Long Beach$5,000
Sonoma Land Trust$5,000
Environmental Defense Fund$5,000
Arthritis Foundation$1,914
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Freedom of the Press Foundation: $100 → 10%Charity Navigator: $100 → 7%Charity Navigator: $100 → 7%Charity Navigator: $100 → 7%Charity Navigator: $100 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
MT
NY
NV
SD
OH
NJ
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$185k · 21 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2022, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
14

Total granted

$185k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+9%

Still filing today

52%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
EnvironmentHealthHuman ServicesInternationalCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $20k · revenue +102%
  • DR
    DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $20k · revenue +32%
  • SL
    SONOMA LAND TRUST
    5× · 2018–2022 · $15k · revenue +334%

Funded once

  • AD
    Alzheimers Disease Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • CO
    City of Hope
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • AF
    AARP FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
3
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
4
Earth & Space Research

Increase societal understanding of the earth system through scientific research and education.

Science & Tech
5
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
6
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
7
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
8
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
9
American National Standards Institute

To enhance both the global competitiveness of u.s. business and the u.s. quality of life by promoting and facilitating voluntary consensus standards and conformity assessment systems, and safeguarding their integrity.

Public Benefit
10
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
11
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
12
Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

California State University Long Beach: $30,000 · OtherCalifornia State University Long BeachPlanned Parenthood: $15,500 · OtherPlanned ParenthoodArthritis Foundation: $11,000 · OtherArthritis FoundationAlzheimers Association: $10,500 · OtherAlzheimers AssociationAntelope Valley College: $7,000 · OtherAntelope Valley CollegeAntelope Valley College Foundation: $5,000 · OtherAlzheimers Disease Foundation: $5,000 · OtherUnited Way Northern CA Fire Disaster Relief: $3,500 · Other+15 more: $16,725 · Other+15 moreDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $19,500 · HealthDIABETES RESEARCH I…BONE HEALTH AND OSTEOPOROSIS FOUNDATION: $10,500 · HealthBONE HEALTH AND OST…Sansum Diabetes Research Institute: $5,000 · HealthSansum Diabetes Res…ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,914 · HealthSONOMA LAND TRUST: $14,500 · EnvironmentSONOMA LAND …ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $6,100 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTA…SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $2,500 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB …+2 more: $1,050 · EnvironmentUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $12,500 · InternationalUNITED STATE…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $11,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SAN…AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN C…MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $1,350 · PhilanthropyAARP FOUNDATION: $500 · Human ServicesCharity Navigator: $400 · Human ServicesFREEDOM OF THE PRESS FOUNDATION: $100 · Human Services
Other$104,225Health$36,914Environment$24,150International$23,500Civil Rights$20,000Philanthropy$1,350Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $19,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSONOMA LAND TRUST: $14,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBONE HEALTH AND OSTEOPOROSIS FOUNDATION: $10,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $6,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSansum Diabetes Research Institute: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAntelope Valley College Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,914 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $1,350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM OF THE PRESS FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SONOMA LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds BONE HEALTH AND OSTEOPOROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Sansum Diabetes Research Institute ↗
  • Who funds Antelope Valley College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds AARP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Charity Navigator ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM OF THE PRESS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bryant Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bryant Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bryant Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bryant Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bryant’s filings →

    More from the funding graph